RE: SOTW: Isuzu Bighorn Lotus Edition
RE: SOTW: Isuzu Bighorn Lotus Edition
Friday 12th April 2013

SOTW: Isuzu Bighorn Lotus Edition

An off-roader with a silly name lurking in the bargain bin this week



Back in the 90s, Japanese auto makers thought that releasing special editions with exciting or strangely evocative words in their titles was a great way to build extra value into what might otherwise be quite dull vehicles.

Sometimes they would do a deal with a cooler (though not necessarily connected) brand for ‘rub-off’ rights. The ultimate of course was to have both these marketing tricks in the one name.

Feeling... ahem... horny?
Feeling... ahem... horny?
This Isuzu Bighorn Lotus Edition is a fine example of the genre, conjuring up as it does the thrilling combination of F1 dynamics and sexual might. Obviously, your own jokes will be far superior to ours, so do feel free to send in as many of them as possible directly to Dan Trent c/o PistonHeads, ideally written in longhand on whatever scraps of paper you may find lying about in the house or bathroom and sent via a delivery method which requests a signature. Thanks.

‘Bighorn’ (fnarr) was the Japanese-market name given to the car that was sold in the UK as the Isuzu Trooper, making this a JDM grey import. Owners love Troopers – though not in that way, of course. They love the space, the strength, and in special editions like this, the spec. They use words like ‘indestructible’ a lot and praise their (relatively) low running costs, dependable starting and ability to notch up outlandish mileages. Unencumbered by the troublesome injector seals that blighted the third-gen model’s 3.0-litre 159hp common-rail lump, this second-gen (i.e. 1992-1998) specimen has the admirably rugged Fred Flintstone-spec 3.1. Timing is by belt, changeable every 60K miles. Blocked exhaust gas recirculation valves can scupper your MOT test, but other than that, older is definitely better if you’re into dogged reliability.

With 114hp, it's hardly virile, mind
With 114hp, it's hardly virile, mind
The trade off is performance, or the lack of it. With two tonnes to haul and only 114hp to haul it, you’ll be lucky to see 60mph come up in under 16 seconds. But by gum, once you’re up there you’ll take some stopping. In fact, for more urgent stops you’re better off putting your faith in the bull bar and ladder chassis rather than the brakes. The rear calipers can seize up in the wet on leggier cars too.

There’s a kind of overdrive function on the automatic transmission which muffles motorway clatter to an acceptable level and which can take fuel consumption to the kind of 30mpg+ figures that are just a distant fantasy for Landie V8 owners. The jury’s out on the long-term reliability of the auto ‘box, though that’s more of a reflection on the heroically durable engine.

LWB Troopers like this one give a comfier ride than the shorties, albeit with some small disbenefit to extreme offroad nadgeration. Having said that, the welcome absence of macho wheelarch extensions boosts this model’s practicality on narrower or rutted tracks.

Sturdy, but not too stiff - that's the Bighorn way
Sturdy, but not too stiff - that's the Bighorn way
The other pleasing omission from the Trooper spec is any suggestion of ‘country gentleman’ branding. As befits the name (the UK-market one, that is), these are no-nonsense cars that will see you through most small- to medium-sized wars. They are working vehicles and towing titans, with all that that entails in the suspension and transmission departments. Special edition imports like this one, however, are often purchased for different reasons and could very easily have dodged the yoke of heartless Farmer Giles.

Watch the hoses from the intercooler: any split there will quickly lead to cylinder head failure, which (at Shed price points) equals a write-off. In 2005 Isuzu tried to boost the uptake of its genuine parts by slashing prices by over 50 per cent, so regular maintenance shouldn’t be too ruinous. You should replace the oil fairly regularly, but 245/70 R16 tyres are fairly cheap. It goes without saying that any separately-chassised vehicle of this vintage needs a good old investigate with a bright torch and a big hammer.

The Lotus position. No, not that type of position...
The Lotus position. No, not that type of position...
Those who have moved to Troopers from 2.8 Shoguns seem pleased by the change, often remarking later on the relative fragility of their Mitsus. Vauxhall’s attempt to skim off some of that sweet Trooper cream with its identical-bar-the-badges ’94 Monterey fizzled out five years later with few takers. Just shows you the power and associations of a badge. With the benefit of hindsight Vauxhall should have followed Isuzu’s lead on creative titling, cobbling something up along the lines of the Japanese company’s real-life Giga 20 Light Dump or the Mysterious Utility Wizard. Shed retrospectively suggests the Vauxhall Luton Nippy Strength, or perhaps the Vauxhall Bright Young Glow Of Fragrant M1 Junction 10. Again, Dan welcomes all your written submissions by recorded delivery.

Despite the badge on that Momo steering wheel and the (cough) ‘Lotus handling pack’, you don’t need Shed to tell you that supple, feelsome handling and laser-sharp turn-in will most definitely not be the order of the day.

Here’s the ad, concluded most thoughtfully in this case with the number to call should you find yourself about to get friendly with a tree.

GREEN 4x4.3100 cc Diesel, Automatic. 1993 K Reg Isuzu Trooper 3.1 TURBO BIG HORN LOTUS 5dr, 5 Doors, Automatic, Estate, Diesel, 155,000 miles, Metallic Green. 7 SEATS SIDE STEPS BULL BAR TOW PACK REMOTE LOCKING RECENT TYRES ELECTRIC WINDOWS POWER STEERING C/D PLAYER. MOT JUNE 2013 TAX END OF APRIL VISA DEBIT CARDS 999

Author
Discussion

Frimley111R

Original Poster:

19,286 posts

264 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Was there really nothing better than this for SOTW? This is just an old tank.

Nicholls22

57 posts

192 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
It literally is the size of a shed, so why can't it be shed of the week?

r11co

6,244 posts

260 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Aka Vauxhall Monterey?! Nuff said.



Edited by r11co on Friday 12th April 09:12

Krikkit

27,938 posts

211 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Not a bad SOTW - I can't help but thinking that everyone I see in one of these/a big Trooper is a total skinflint. I've known two folk who owned these and they were fanatical tightwads.

MX7

7,902 posts

204 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Not very inspiring.

delmatt

506 posts

221 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Mat777 will be along to remind us how well this will go round corners very soon.

It is a huge piece of metal for less than a grand though.

aww999

2,078 posts

291 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
I have no interest in the car, but that was the funniest shed of the week piece I can remember for a while!

"small disbenefit to extreme offroad nadgeration" indeed biggrin

gforceg

3,525 posts

209 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Soon to be seen, parked badly, at a stupor-market near you.

trando

771 posts

201 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Imagine being hit by a fully laden one of them when it's brakes inevitably fail. Doesn't bear thinking about...

Bitzer

4,552 posts

198 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
I had one of these as a company vehicle when working as a field engineer for a telecoms company.

It was the Trooper Citation 3.0TD, and for a big vehicle it shifted. Averaged around 21 mpg no matter how it was driven, and it was driven reasonably hard driving

The worst thing was the 6k oil changes, so every 6 weeks I had to meet a mobile mech somewhere on my travels.

It let me down once, travelling up the M40 on the way to Liverpool the fan/aux belts disintegrated yikes

cjgreaves41

106 posts

185 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
I think a £1000 garden shed would actually make a better vehicle

skyrover

12,700 posts

234 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Nicholls22 said:
It literally is the size of a shed, so why can't it be shed of the week?
Not that big though is it?

Trooper

Width: 68.7 in
Length: 183.5 in

Defender 110

Width: 70.5 in
Length: 183.0 in

BMW 3 Series

Width: 71.3 in
Length: 182.0 in

Transit Van SWB

Width: 82.0 in
Length: 205.9

wiliferus

4,219 posts

228 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Father in law had one of these, the 3.1 too. Agricultural is not the word. I've driven more refined tractors. It didn't shift at all, I'm not sure that the steering wheel was actually connected to the wheels, if it was the steering column must have been made of marshmallow.
Fuel economy was biblically poor.

Thankfully the engine let go... The turbo and HG went pop, not sure which one caused which!

If you're in the market for a budget 4x4 you'd be much better off going for a Shogun/Pajero.

SrMoreno

546 posts

176 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
trando said:
Imagine being hit by a fully laden one of them when it's brakes inevitably fail. Doesn't bear thinking about...
Imagine being hit by a lorry "when its brakes inevitably fail". That's why we should ban all wheeled vehicles larger than a pram. For the kids, you know.

David87

7,032 posts

242 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
It amuses me that a car called the Bighorn has trouble with its head. Interestingly, examples under Jewish or Muslim ownership don't have any issues, as when the engines were new they removed excess head material for cleaner running. Fact.

P2BS

3,918 posts

173 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
I revert to my childhood when I see a SOTW like this... I look at the pictures, realise I have zero interest in the words, and move on. Very uninspiring.
I've always looked at the SOTW as a 'I can't believe you can get one of those for a grand'. I'm looking at this Isuzu & thinking 'would someone really pay a grand for that?'.

tomic

720 posts

175 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
I was on holiday in Costa Rica last year and got picked up from my hotel by a V6 Petrol Taxi one of these.

It actually did sound really nice. I think that would have been a more appropriate SOTW

MadDog1962

900 posts

192 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
I recall a few folks I knew in Australia and NZ ran these back in the day. They enjoyed them very much. Seemed better made than the equivalent Mitsubishi or Nissan.

MarJay

2,180 posts

205 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
That car is about as un PH as you can get IMO.

Terrible shed. Bad shed. Awful shed. Ludicrous shed. Boring shed. Slow shed. Not good offroad shed. Not particularly comfortable shed. Not much fun shed.

Pick an insult and it fits to this vehicle really. Apart from the fact it is laughably tagged with the word 'lotus'.

Geez, shed. You're the highlight of my working week, where I can spend five minutes reading about an interesting car for a bag of sand. Instead I have to read about a car that beyond middle aged roofers or plasterers with no interest in cars use to take their vast brood to school.

This has to be a shoe in for the worst shed ever without a shadow of a doubt.

Ellieb10

63 posts

183 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
A mate had one of these in "Irmscher" spec. Pretty comfy as a ski wagon until the turbo blew. I'd double my money and get a 4.2 td Nissan Patrol though. Basically indestructible. I, very unfortunately, hit a chap who didnt check before he crossed the road doing 45kph in one a few years ago. Patrol shrugged it off, didn't end well for him though.

I dont like to start this again but.......Anal Lotus Bighorn?