BiB using a laser gun on Motorway Bridge
BiB using a laser gun on Motorway Bridge
Author
Discussion

bluepolarbear

Original Poster:

1,666 posts

269 months

Wednesday 6th October 2004
quotequote all
If the BiB is outside his car with his laser toy and snapping motorists what happens if he spots a speeder. Is he going to jump in the car and chase them down or are they photographed like the scamera vans? If photograph how is this taken - presumbly same extra kit needs to be bolted onto the laser camera? If so guessing weight and size will necessate a tripod rather than hand held? If using camera / video I believe max range is around 400m - anyone want to confirm? Any one point to a picture on the web with the distance count >400m? If using camera guess trigger speeds will be APCO ie 80+ but if chasing down presumbly trigger speed is higher otherwise you might as was well just pick a car at random and save getting out the car - if so what sort of trigger speed?

kevinday

13,675 posts

303 months

Thursday 7th October 2004
quotequote all
I have heard of a case with a laser operated at around 600 metres, I believe they are supposed to be accurate to about 3000 metres (supposed being the operative word!).

pmanson

13,388 posts

276 months

Thursday 7th October 2004
quotequote all
kevinday said:
I have heard of a case with a laser operated at around 600 metres, I believe they are supposed to be accurate to about 3000 metres (supposed being the operative word!).


hey got my dad from 1/2 mile away on the M4

cptsideways

13,831 posts

275 months

Thursday 7th October 2004
quotequote all
My Prolaser if tripod mounted can clock silver cars from 3000ft with alarming ease. Hand held it's less than 1500ft especially after a dodgy night out on the tiles.

Expect 1000-500ft range when on motorway bridges.

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Thursday 7th October 2004
quotequote all
Stopped a driver today....94 mph on a motorway....wanted a 'warning/telling off', but 94mph in lunchhour traffic on a busy motorway is too fast..IMO...

Street

r32

401 posts

275 months

Thursday 7th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
Stopped a driver today....94 mph on a motorway....wanted a 'warning/telling off', but 94mph in lunchhour traffic on a busy motorway is too fast..IMO...

Street


You guys seem to police the motorways a lot (going on the recent posts) for speeding.

Out of interest, how many speeders do you stop in the lower limits, compared to the 'easy' stops from bridges over the motorway?

Was the motorway in question an accident blackspot, or just a random traffic stop?

People are always telling me that motorways are the safest of our roads you see, so why are there more posts about stopping speeders on motorways than there are about stopping speeders in 30 zones??

Just wondering....

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Thursday 7th October 2004
quotequote all
hiya r32...

The motorway isn't a particularly dangerous one, but does see it's fair share of bumps...

Out of todays speeders...We followed one, who between two point was averaging 93mph....We followed him for 2.1miles before activating lights/sirens....only then did he look in his mirror...

In addition, his braking distances were also questionable on occasions...

If he'd been doing under 90 and had 'toned it down' upon seeing us, we would have passed him and carried on..

Street

yugguy

10,728 posts

258 months

Friday 8th October 2004
quotequote all
To be fair to the police, a lot of them are like street there. If you see them and slow down they will live and let live.

r32

401 posts

275 months

Friday 8th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
hiya r32...

The motorway isn't a particularly dangerous one, but does see it's fair share of bumps...

Out of todays speeders...We followed one, who between two point was averaging 93mph....We followed him for 2.1miles before activating lights/sirens....only then did he look in his mirror...

In addition, his braking distances were also questionable on occasions...

If he'd been doing under 90 and had 'toned it down' upon seeing us, we would have passed him and carried on..

Street


Now thats the sort of fair policing that i like

Always thought that if i got stopped by a marked car that had been behind me for a while and i'd not seen them, then i deserved all i got.

autismuk

1,529 posts

263 months

Friday 8th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
hiya r32...

The motorway isn't a particularly dangerous one, but does see it's fair share of bumps...

Out of todays speeders...We followed one, who between two point was averaging 93mph....We followed him for 2.1miles before activating lights/sirens....only then did he look in his mirror...

In addition, his braking distances were also questionable on occasions...

If he'd been doing under 90 and had 'toned it down' upon seeing us, we would have passed him and carried on..

Street


You must despair. I suppose we must count ourselves fortunate that he was looking out the front, let alone out the back.

These people are just *!*!*!* ; tonk up the outside lane at 95ish, honk everyone else out of the way etc etc, see it all the time

gh0st

4,693 posts

281 months

Friday 8th October 2004
quotequote all
How many people using bad lane discipline did you pull over...?

medicineman

1,817 posts

260 months

Friday 8th October 2004
quotequote all
Mixed views on this, on one hand if things go wrong on the motorway it gets very messy very quickly. On the other hand I would have thought the best policy would be for big, marked cars to be mixing up with the traffic therefore increasing driver contact time with a marked vehicle rather than sitting up a slip road. The slip road sitter may hit one driver every x minutes but the mark car will be seen and hopefully modify dangerous to safer behaviour. But it won't generate as many tickets.

But there again I will admit I'm not a traffic copper. Has there been any research done? Whats force policy or individual experience of this?

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Friday 8th October 2004
quotequote all
Trouble is mediceman...some drivers will only learn from being hit in the pocket and licence...

Hamster

136 posts

260 months

Friday 8th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
hiya r32...

The motorway isn't a particularly dangerous one, but does see it's fair share of bumps...

Out of todays speeders...We followed one, who between two point was averaging 93mph....We followed him for 2.1miles before activating lights/sirens....only then did he look in his mirror...

In addition, his braking distances were also questionable on occasions...

If he'd been doing under 90 and had 'toned it down' upon seeing us, we would have passed him and carried on..

Street


Hi Streetcop

Like I said in a previous post, 2.1m at an average of 93mph without paying attention to what's behind him. It's not speeding he should be done for, it's DWDCaA.
That's only the opinion of a small furry rodent of course!!

KS

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Saturday 9th October 2004
quotequote all
Hamster said:

Hi Streetcop

Like I said in a previous post, 2.1m at an average of 93mph without paying attention to what's behind him. It's not speeding he should be done for, it's DWDCaA.
That's only the opinion of a small furry rodent of course!!

KS


Hiya Hamster...

Unfortunately, it's not DWDCaA....as it doesn't fit the offence unfortunately....(having said that, his braking distances at times was a bit questionable, but the fact that he's not seen a police vehicle behind him, doesn't fit the criterea.)

Besides, 3 points and £60 is adequate in the circumstances. IMO

Street

cptsideways

13,831 posts

275 months

Saturday 9th October 2004
quotequote all
If your doing those sort of speeds & you have'nt seen a jam sandwich behind you (or even an unmarked) then fair cop.

Would you be more lenient if eagle eyes here spotted you in an unmrarked car?

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Sunday 10th October 2004
quotequote all
cptsideways said:
If your doing those sort of speeds & you have'nt seen a jam sandwich behind you (or even an unmarked) then fair cop.

Would you be more lenient if eagle eyes here spotted you in an unmrarked car?


Anything that makes me think the driver is 'switched on' and not just a 'foot down and hope for the best' merchant...goes in his/her favour..

Sat on a twisting dual carraigeway 40mph limit.(KSI site) yesterday.....I'm side on to the road in a Volvo V70 with battenburg marking...car comes hurtling up towards us....breaks at the last minute and the pro-laser still had him at 53mph.....No sympathy really...especially when his licence was only 12 months old...

Street

TripleS

4,294 posts

265 months

Sunday 10th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:

cptsideways said:
If your doing those sort of speeds & you have'nt seen a jam sandwich behind you (or even an unmarked) then fair cop.

Would you be more lenient if eagle eyes here spotted you in an unmrarked car?



Anything that makes me think the driver is 'switched on' and not just a 'foot down and hope for the best' merchant...goes in his/her favour..


There you are you see. I knew Gary & Co. would be far superior to those damned cameras!

streetcop said:
Sat on a twisting dual carraigeway 40mph limit.(KSI site) yesterday.....I'm side on to the road in a Volvo V70 with battenburg marking...car comes hurtling up towards us....breaks at the last minute and the pro-laser still had him at 53mph.....No sympathy really...especially when his licence was only 12 months old...

Street


Well hopefully he'll calm down a bit before some real harm results, but I guess that was a bit of youthful exuberance.

Anyhow today is the 45th anniversary of our first date, so we're off for what I hope will be a pleasant tootle out for the day.

Have a nice day Gary, and everyone,.
Dave.

bluepolarbear

Original Poster:

1,666 posts

269 months

Sunday 10th October 2004
quotequote all
pmanson said:

kevinday said:
I have heard of a case with a laser operated at around 600 metres, I believe they are supposed to be accurate to about 3000 metres (supposed being the operative word!).



hey got my dad from 1/2 mile away on the M4


I know the laser is good for 1000 metres + but is that photo evidence with NIP in the post.

I've yet see camera evidence taken at a range greater than 400m

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Sunday 10th October 2004
quotequote all
Top speeder today...62mph in a 40mph zone....