Registration / IVA Question - 'Barn Find'
Registration / IVA Question - 'Barn Find'
Author
Discussion

skwdenyer

Original Poster:

18,511 posts

261 months

Sunday 16th June 2013
quotequote all
OK, so late at night, I was browsing eBay, and found this beauty:



link

Ignoring the degree to which beauty is in the eye of the beholder, the real question. DVLA has this registered as a 1972 Reliant Scimitar.

My understanding is that the Scimitar has a separate chassis and unstressed body. I'm not 'up' on the rules nowadays; are we still talking "points" for major parts of the vehicle?

During a brief search, I've read conflicting advice as to what constitutes 'rebodying' vs 'radically altering'. I haven't had sight of the V5 but, if it is indeed declared as 'standard', could this just be a DVLA inspection and note on V5 of rebody?

minitici

200 posts

226 months

Sunday 16th June 2013
quotequote all
A think of beauty!

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

219 months

Sunday 16th June 2013
quotequote all
endless amounts of box section and an actual plank of wood.. Brilliant biggrin

KMF

525 posts

169 months

Sunday 16th June 2013
quotequote all
Mmmm you found a blue barn

tr7v8

7,523 posts

249 months

Sunday 16th June 2013
quotequote all
I have seen it on the bay as well. It is a rebody on a Scimitar chassis, so no IVA just MOT & away you go. May need changes to V5 such as colour, seats etc.

skwdenyer

Original Poster:

18,511 posts

261 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
tr7v8 said:
I have seen it on the bay as well. It is a rebody on a Scimitar chassis, so no IVA just MOT & away you go. May need changes to V5 such as colour, seats etc.
Thank you. However, it is, and it isn't... looking at a picture of a bare chassis:



shows that the chassis for the 'blue barn' must have been "bobbed" in the manner of so many Land Rovers et al. As a result, it perhaps isn't a 'rebody' so much as a 'radically altered' vehicle?

From what I can gather, it may depend upon when the work was done (and when it can be proved to have been done, more to the point), but even so, it seems a grey area. Any more thoughts? Thanks!

Redcar49

7 posts

151 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
Looks to me like it wouldn't be out of place in the opening scenes of "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang"!!!

tr7v8

7,523 posts

249 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
tr7v8 said:
I have seen it on the bay as well. It is a rebody on a Scimitar chassis, so no IVA just MOT & away you go. May need changes to V5 such as colour, seats etc.
Thank you. However, it is, and it isn't... looking at a picture of a bare chassis:

shows that the chassis for the 'blue barn' must have been "bobbed" in the manner of so many Land Rovers et al. As a result, it perhaps isn't a 'rebody' so much as a 'radically altered' vehicle?

From what I can gather, it may depend upon when the work was done (and when it can be proved to have been done, more to the point), but even so, it seems a grey area. Any more thoughts? Thanks!
It has only lost the last bit of its chassis, could be deemed non-structural. I think given its age you'd get away with it.

Frankthered

1,666 posts

201 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
minitici said:
A think of beauty!
You mean close your eyes and think of beauty??

GinG15

501 posts

192 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
sammio or ribble or how they are called today are offering a 50ies style body kit, to be fitted on a scimi se5...as the chassis remains untouched (untouched also means for most builders: we keep the dirt and rust) those cars are considered as rebody and therefore keep there tax-exempt status.

correctly registered they will get the V5c issued with the kit-name or a combination of scimitar/reliant and kitname.