Eventually......yipeee
Author
Discussion

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
Eventually a sign to warn the numpties about hogging the middle lane:

New signs aimed at road hoggers


The aim is to make better use of motorway capacity
A new attempt is being made to educate England's motorway drivers to keep in the proper lane.
Messages are being shown on signs on several motorways saying "Keep left unless overtaking" and "Don't hog the middle lane".

Highways Agency officials will be monitoring drivers' reactions as part of a campaign to reduce accidents.

The messages will be shown on parts of the M1, M6, M18 and M62 in the north of England and the East Midlands.


Roads Minister David Jamieson said: "Poor lane discipline causes frustration to drivers and can disrupt the flow of traffic.

"We have all seen people on the motorway sitting in the wrong lane and experienced the inconvenience and congestion it causes."

Messages are being carried at various points on motorways in South Yorkshire, Cheshire, Lancashire, Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, Northamptonshire and Leicestershire.

The results of the week-long trial will be studied by the Highways Agency before deciding whether they should be a permanent feature of the motorway network.

In August the RAC Foundation said that drivers hogging the middle and outside lanes were "stealing" up to 700 miles of motorway space from other drivers in peak periods.

That is roughly equivalent to the distance from Aberdeen to Penzance.


Street


destroyer

256 posts

263 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
magic

jimbro1000

1,619 posts

307 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all

mad jock

1,272 posts

285 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
Well done, Highways Agency. They've finally caught up with Scotland, where we've had similar signs on our overhead gantries for some time.

gh0st

4,693 posts

281 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
As much as I this initiative very much, it could turn the wrong way.

Like we get people throwing a minor spasticated fit if they see someone merely glancing at a mobile phone while driving, or there are others that jump around like some sort of freak on amphetimines if they see someone exceeding the speed limit by 0.0001mph, we will also see "vigilanties" having heart attacks when someone is legitimately holding the lane (like overtaking 2 lorries and there is no point in pulling in until they are past both)

Hopefully it will make people think "oooooo keep left, thats a good idea, doris lets try it ()" more than yet another tool to drive around saying "Told you so"

Gh0st

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
I know where you're coming from Gh0st, but I TOLD YOU SO to these people is exactly how I'd feel......

Flat in Fifth

47,973 posts

274 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
gh0st said:
As much as I this initiative very much, it could turn the wrong way.

Like we get people throwing a minor spasticated fit if they see someone merely glancing at a mobile phone while driving, or there are others that jump around like some sort of freak on amphetimines if they see someone exceeding the speed limit by 0.0001mph, we will also see "vigilanties" having heart attacks when someone is legitimately holding the lane (like overtaking 2 lorries and there is no point in pulling in until they are past both)

Hopefully it will make people think "oooooo keep left, thats a good idea, doris lets try it ()" more than yet another tool to drive around saying "Told you so"

Gh0st


Good point in my opinion, Gh0st.

Let's face it most drivers don't lift their vision enough. Bet we've all seen drivers making the extravagant swoop into lane 1 to "teach the middle lane owner a lesson" then see them have to brake because they've suddenly noticed the heavy the alleged "MLOC member" was already planning to overtake.

Leave roads policing to the police, just need more of them, and not the chocolate fireguard HA version either.

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
Flat in Fifth said:

Leave roads policing to the police, just need more of them, and not the chocolate fireguard HA version either.



What is the problem with the Highways Agency Traffic Officers?

Street

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
Yep..tonker...I would agree 50mph is too slow.....

Obviously, we don't know why they were travelling so slow.....they might have been looking for something...but if not...it's too slow and causes probs...

Us BiB should travel at the speed of the vehicles in lane one....ie 56-60 mph..

However, the HATOs have many uses and are a welcome addition....

Street

Flat in Fifth

47,973 posts

274 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
I've answered this before.

In the area where they are deployed they have replaced proper traffic units who have been at best redeployed, at worst removed entirely out of the system.

The theory that it is better for a HA traffic officer to attend a breakdown rather than tieing up a traffic unit is a good one, and to be honest works. Though not all the time, you still get traffic units babysitting for vrious operational reasons.

Unfortunately what I see is that in quiet times they the HA bods sit at strategic deployment locations (1), whereas a traffic unit would have been out on patrol engaged in pro-active roads policing.

(1)Definition of strategic deployment locations: = tea spots

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
Flat in Fifth said:
I've answered this before.


Well you've answered it again...and I thank you..

[quote=flatinfifth]The theory that it is better for a HA traffic officer to attend a breakdown rather than tieing up a traffic unit is a good one, and to be honest works. Though not all the time, you still get traffic units babysitting for vrious operational reasons.[/quote]

Breakdowns and such like are a fantastic way to use HATO's. I've seen an increase in their use lately and have been suitable impressed by their professionalism and the assistance they have offered, allowing my and my colleague to continue police work. Same with some haulage firms having their own escort vehicle....Far better than a BiB sitting at 30mph for miles and miles....

[quote=flatinfifth]Unfortunately what I see is that in quiet times they the HA bods sit at strategic deployment locations (1), whereas a traffic unit would have been out on patrol engaged in pro-active roads policing.

(1)Definition of strategic deployment locations: = tea spots[/quote]

I'm sure some BiB sit in tea spots at times...sometimes it's geographically easier to respond to things from certain tea spots than from the nick.

Street

Flat in Fifth

47,973 posts

274 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:

flatinfifth said:
Unfortunately what I see is that in quiet times they the HA bods sit at strategic deployment locations (1), whereas a traffic unit would have been out on patrol engaged in pro-active roads policing.

(1)Definition of strategic deployment locations: = tea spots


I'm sure some BiB sit in tea spots at times...sometimes it's geographically easier to respond to things from certain tea spots than from the nick.


Don't disagree with any of that, it's just the degree involved.

Possibly more of a management issue. Would you say that 3 manned units sitting together in a motorway service car park for 3.5 hours is a good use of resources? Personally I think it isn't. Maybe that was an extreme case, but I honestly see a lot of trouser seat shining.



Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all


Shiny trousers has always been the name of traffic cops from our beat colleagues...

I don't know much about Highways Agency management, so I don't know what their orders are regarding deployment.

Street

gh0st

4,693 posts

281 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
I know where you're coming from Gh0st, but I TOLD YOU SO to these people is exactly how I'd feel......


Yup

And I hope as a police officer this gives you more reason to get these cts to realise how annoying they are.

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
gh0st said:

Streetcop said:
I know where you're coming from Gh0st, but I TOLD YOU SO to these people is exactly how I'd feel......



Yup

And I hope as a police officer this gives you more reason to get these cts to realise how annoying they are.




It is really annoying isn't it?

iaint

10,040 posts

261 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
One thing to note about this:

Sometimes I find the left lane to be unusable due to the ruts left by the lorries (not a dig at HGVs but at the road). Point in case - coming from M25 clockwise onto the M1 - the 2 left lanes are hazardous to anything with remotely sensitive steering. There are many stretches of Motorway that exhibit this defect.

I'm happy to drive in th eleft lane when it's suitable but would a BiB take that as a reasonable excuse for not pulling to the left? I would hope so. Of course camera enforcement wouldn't be so competent...

Iain

john_p

7,073 posts

273 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
mad jock said:
Well done, Highways Agency. They've finally caught up with Scotland, where we've had similar signs on our overhead gantries for some time.


Do they work?

Size Nine Elm

5,167 posts

307 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
john_p said:

mad jock said:
Well done, Highways Agency. They've finally caught up with Scotland, where we've had similar signs on our overhead gantries for some time.



Do they work?

Hard to tell - I've only seen them on 2-lane motorways (M8) where middle-lane hogging is a skilled art restricted to motorcyclists

bluepolarbear

1,666 posts

269 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
Eventually a sign to warn the numpties about hogging the middle lane:

New signs aimed at road hoggers
.




Why don't you do them for Driving without consideration for other road users?

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 11th October 2004
quotequote all
bluepolarbear said:


Streetcop said:
Eventually a sign to warn the numpties about hogging the middle lane:

New signs aimed at road hoggers
.






Why don't you do them for Driving without consideration for other road users?



Because that's not the offence.......It's 'Driving without reasonable consideration for other road users'.

too much time wasted.....unless they really are numpties..

Street

>> Edited by Streetcop on Monday 11th October 19:35