What is Aero actually worth ?
Discussion
Chaps, I know there are some experienced racers on here. So I have a question.
Over a 1 hour TT, what is the effect of various Aero. Is there a definitive scientific research study on
(say)
Solid real wheel
Aero Helmet
Deep rims.
Tri Bars
Etc
Have spanked a 35 km/h for an hour and seen myself beaten by 9 minutes by the top riders, I am wondering,
1. Train harder
2. Throw money at the problem
I was on a old school racer, some of these boys where on full tri TT bikes, Woodies (pecker head helmets) and with solid rears.
One study published in the German Tour magazine Jan 2007
They put Uwe Peschel on a normal bike:
Needed Watts for Speed = 45 km/h :
Stevens San Remo bike with normal handlebar 465 Watts needed to go 45 km/h
Same bike Hands down the drops: 406 watts needed
Same bikeEaston Aeroforce bar: 369 Watts
Same bike Triathlon position (5.5 cm lower bar, saddle forwards): 360 Watts
Same bike Triathlon position (5.5 cm lower bar, saddle forwards) and
carbon Tri spoke wheels front and rear: 345 Watt
Cervelo + Tri spoke front 328 Watts
Cervelo + Tri spoke front + disk rear wheel : 320
Cervelo + Tri spoke front + disk rear wheel +Giro helmet: 317
Cervelo + Tri spoke front + disk rear wheel +Giro helmet + speed suit: 307
Cervelo + Tri spoke front + disk rear wheel +Giro helmet + speed suit +
saddle 3 cm further back: 293 Watts
From 465 to 293 watts... That's a lotta savings.
Loads
PS. If your only doing 21 mph on your RB in racing, work on fitness first i reckon then spend some £££, you need to be around 24-25 mph on a RB first to see the big gains. Was that 21 mph on hoods/drops ??
They put Uwe Peschel on a normal bike:
Needed Watts for Speed = 45 km/h :
Stevens San Remo bike with normal handlebar 465 Watts needed to go 45 km/h
Same bike Hands down the drops: 406 watts needed
Same bikeEaston Aeroforce bar: 369 Watts
Same bike Triathlon position (5.5 cm lower bar, saddle forwards): 360 Watts
Same bike Triathlon position (5.5 cm lower bar, saddle forwards) and
carbon Tri spoke wheels front and rear: 345 Watt
Cervelo + Tri spoke front 328 Watts
Cervelo + Tri spoke front + disk rear wheel : 320
Cervelo + Tri spoke front + disk rear wheel +Giro helmet: 317
Cervelo + Tri spoke front + disk rear wheel +Giro helmet + speed suit: 307
Cervelo + Tri spoke front + disk rear wheel +Giro helmet + speed suit +
saddle 3 cm further back: 293 Watts
From 465 to 293 watts... That's a lotta savings.
Loads
PS. If your only doing 21 mph on your RB in racing, work on fitness first i reckon then spend some £££, you need to be around 24-25 mph on a RB first to see the big gains. Was that 21 mph on hoods/drops ??
Edited by superkartracer on Wednesday 26th June 12:29
Interesting link fromage, but - and I did just skim it so may have missed it - it doesn't seem to factor in mass. I would be interested to know what effect that has, as a TT bike is typically a chunk heavier than a similarly priced road bike. So does the aero benefit on the flat bits outweigh the increased climbing performance on the hills that a road bike offers.
I'm doing a team half iron-man at the weekend in the lakes on a VERY hilly route and am curious whether I'd be theoretically better off on aero bike than on a road bike.
I'm doing a team half iron-man at the weekend in the lakes on a VERY hilly route and am curious whether I'd be theoretically better off on aero bike than on a road bike.
rhinochopig said:
Interesting link fromage, but - and I did just skim it so may have missed it - it doesn't seem to factor in mass. I would be interested to know what effect that has, as a TT bike is typically a chunk heavier than a similarly priced road bike. So does the aero benefit on the flat bits outweigh the increased climbing performance on the hills that a road bike offers.
I'm doing a team half iron-man at the weekend in the lakes on a VERY hilly route and am curious whether I'd be theoretically better off on aero bike than on a road bike.
1-2 kg? makes little difference and if that bothered lose some weight.I'm doing a team half iron-man at the weekend in the lakes on a VERY hilly route and am curious whether I'd be theoretically better off on aero bike than on a road bike.
rhinochopig said:
Interesting link fromage, but - and I did just skim it so may have missed it - it doesn't seem to factor in mass. I would be interested to know what effect that has, as a TT bike is typically a chunk heavier than a similarly priced road bike. So does the aero benefit on the flat bits outweigh the increased climbing performance on the hills that a road bike offers.
I'm doing a team half iron-man at the weekend in the lakes on a VERY hilly route and am curious whether I'd be theoretically better off on aero bike than on a road bike.
Remember that most TT's are not that hilly, so it doesn't matter. 2kg on the flat makes almost no difference hence heavy discs etc.I'm doing a team half iron-man at the weekend in the lakes on a VERY hilly route and am curious whether I'd be theoretically better off on aero bike than on a road bike.
Up steep hills weight more important, but only you can decide whether the little bit of extra weight it worth it. If the course has a lot of flat in it, or the inclines are steady I'd be on a TT bike every time.
Cheers Okgo / SKR. I'm a mountain biker really so for me it's academic, but I just wondered given the race I'm doing is part of a half IM - I agreed in the pub to ride the cycle leg so some friends could do the swim and the run legs - whether many would be doing it on TT bikes, given they're usually the bike of choice for Tri's. IIRC you go over one of the nasty passes and over the top of Shap Fell so it is pretty lumpy.
ETA: Interesting benefit of riding on the drops though - would never have thought it made such a difference. Will have to adopt that at the weekend if my back will cope.
ETA: Interesting benefit of riding on the drops though - would never have thought it made such a difference. Will have to adopt that at the weekend if my back will cope.
superkartracer said:
And ( if you have the balls/mental ) that in the tuck the TT bike could hit 50mph down the other side, much faster than your RB, but than you might die also ha ha 
Being a mountain biker and a big lump to boot, that is where I hope to gain some ground back; when gravity has stopped hating me on uphill bits.
rhinochopig said:
Cheers Okgo / SKR. I'm a mountain biker really so for me it's academic, but I just wondered given the race I'm doing is part of a half IM - I agreed in the pub to ride the cycle leg so some friends could do the swim and the run legs - whether many would be doing it on TT bikes, given they're usually the bike of choice for Tri's. IIRC you go over one of the nasty passes and over the top of Shap Fell so it is pretty lumpy.
ETA: Interesting benefit of riding on the drops though - would never have thought it made such a difference. Will have to adopt that at the weekend if my back will cope.
You'll never believe how much the body slows you down. I compare myself against a dude in my club who produces much less power than me, our positions on the bike (tt bike) look similar, yet he needs 30-40w less than me to go the same speed.ETA: Interesting benefit of riding on the drops though - would never have thought it made such a difference. Will have to adopt that at the weekend if my back will cope.
okgo said:
You'll never believe how much the body slows you down.
Having just switched from a light mountain bike to a road bike, albeit a hand me down Carrera, I simply can't believe the difference in ease and speed. Even riding in wind was a killer and I hated it. Now, I jut get on and go. Same again, since using the drops alot more, just have more energy leftnottusleinad said:
superkartracer said:
And ( if you have the balls/mental ) that in the tuck the TT bike could hit 50mph down the other side, much faster than your RB, but than you might die also ha ha 
You can hit 50mph in the drops on a RB too, with a 50x11 

Gassing Station | Pedal Powered | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



