Not many people know that
Author
Discussion

Upatdawn

Original Poster:

2,202 posts

177 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
So then, what interesting fact about ye olde worlde of ye motoring do ye know?..

I know why LOTUS are called, well LOTUS....
Why Triumph Stags couldnt have Rover V8 engines

Thats bout it really

Steffan

10,362 posts

257 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
Upatdawn said:
So then, what interesting fact about ye olde worlde of ye motoring do ye know?..

I know why LOTUS are called, well LOTUS....
Why Triumph Stags couldnt have Rover V8 engines

Thats bout it really
Having heard various versions of why Lotus was called Lotus and why the lunatic decision was made to use an untested and hopeless V8 when the Rover V8 was in the same stable with the Stag and being personally unconvinced that any of these is entirely correct I would be interested to hear yours. Please.

john2443

6,540 posts

240 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
No idea about Lotus, I've read that not invented here was the reason that Triumph insisted on pursuing their own V8 after they'd merged.

Upatdawn

Original Poster:

2,202 posts

177 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
ok, taking my life in my hands

the 1st car CC built DIDNT sell at auction and came back labelled LOT U/S (lot unsold)

and GM/Buick refused to allow the Stag to be sold stateside with the RV8 engine so another engine had to be sourced

well, they sound plausible



Edited by Upatdawn on Saturday 6th July 22:39

lotus72

777 posts

295 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
'the 1st car KC built DIDNT sell at auction and came back labelled LOT U/S (lot unsold)'
Who is 'KC'??

Monty Zoomer

1,459 posts

186 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
Upatdawn said:
So then, what interesting fact about ye olde worlde of ye motoring do ye know?..

I know why LOTUS are called, well LOTUS....
Why Triumph Stags couldnt have Rover V8 engines

Thats bout it really
Well if you know those facts, why don't you tell the rest of us???

Isn't that what you're hoping the thread will be about??

Facts.

marshalla

15,902 posts

230 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
Upatdawn said:
ok, taking my life in my hands

the 1st car KC built DIDNT sell at auction and came back labelled LOT U/S (lot unsold)
Who is KC and why are you perpetuating a widely known and discredited myth ?



Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

211 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
marshalla said:
Who is KC?

Kolin Chapman, duh. smile

marshalla

15,902 posts

230 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
Papa Hotel said:
marshalla said:
Who is KC?

Kolin Chapman, duh. smile
D'oh! But, damnit that means there's a typo on my car's badges ! They should say AKBC for Arthur Kolin Brian Chapman wink

Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

211 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
marshalla said:
D'oh! But, damnit that means there's a typo on my car's badges ! They should say AKBC for Arthur Kolin Brian Chapman wink
yes We should tell them. Stupid Lotus.

LordBretSinclair

4,306 posts

206 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
Lots of Trouble - Usually Serious rofl

Steffan

10,362 posts

257 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
As I suspected there are no really tenable definitive explanations. The Lots Of Trouble... Lotus acronym is amusing but I do not believe Lotus used it for that reason. I have never yet heard a satisfactory reason for that name, Chapman was a very odd ball and mercurial in temperament.

The more probable explanation of the Stag engine IMO is that the Triumph engineers just wanted to do their own thing. Pity was that they made such a horlicks of it. A potentially very advanced stylish car ruined by the engine faults inherent in every one made. In a way not unlike the way the K series nonsense 30 years later at their descendants at Rover resulted in massive losses. Just cock ups and inane incompetence. No great explanation required.

Sid's Dad

576 posts

170 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
Rivalry between the different factories, marques and development teams that BMC/BL was intense, and weak leadership meant it was often destructive to the wider organization. The Triumph team were determined to show off their abilities by developing their own V8 and fought off any suggestion that they use the Rover unit. A lack of funds meant that it's development time was cut short,meaning that a fundamentally excellent engine was riddled with glitches that ultimately did for the reputation of the Stag.

Similarly, Jaguar went to great lengths to ensure the engine bay of the XJ was too narrow for a vee-engine to ensure no-one would foist the Rover unit on them. This meant the V12 version took three years more development time to remodel the bulkhead and engine bay than it should have done...

Donald Stokes has a lot to answer for.


Steffan

10,362 posts

257 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
Sid's Dad said:
Rivalry between the different factories, marques and development teams that BMC/BL was intense, and weak leadership meant it was often destructive to the wider organization. The Triumph team were determined to show off their abilities by developing their own V8 and fought off any suggestion that they use the Rover unit. A lack of funds meant that it's development time was cut short,meaning that a fundamentally excellent engine was riddled with glitches that ultimately did for the reputation of the Stag.

Similarly, Jaguar went to great lengths to ensure the engine bay of the XJ was too narrow for a vee-engine to ensure no-one would foist the Rover unit on them. This meant the V12 version took three years more development time to remodel the bulkhead and engine bay than it should have done...

Donald Stokes has a lot to answer for.
I agree with your view that internecine rivalry at BLMH and successors caused the Triumph Stag debacle, Equally I do not doubt that Jag did design the XJ with the intention of not having the Buick foisted on them. Internecine rivalry at BLMH and descendants again. Much of the BLMH debacle was created by selfisn stupidity and petty rivalry. Tragic waste of a great heritage.

Upatdawn

Original Poster:

2,202 posts

177 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
I thought the Stag V8 was built cos the stores had bought the worlds longest timing chain in error....


Compo_Simmonite

391 posts

216 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
I read somewhere the SD1 2.6 straight six had to be detuned as it was more powerful than the 3.5 V8.


davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
AIUI the Rover V8 factory was running flat out to cover sales of everything else, so there were no engines available for the Stag. Originally it was going to have the PI 2.5 straight six, but that wasn't powerful enough. They rooted around in the shed and found the Triumph V8.

Rushjob

2,302 posts

287 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
Lotus, named for the fabled lotus eaters, once you've tried one, you'll never want anything else.....

mikial

1,913 posts

291 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
Pirelli Cinturatos were the first radial tyres generally available back in the late 1950s , or was it Michelon X ,
After GM tookover Rootes group Sunbeam Tigers were discontinued because they used a Ford 260 ci V8 .
Ford Prefect ( 100E ) window wipers stopped working going uphill when it rained.
Heaters were an " extra" in many new cars in the middle of the last century.
Paraffin lights were required ( red rear facing , clear lens forward facing ) for street parking after dusk.
My Dad had an Austin Sheerline .

dartissimus

954 posts

203 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
The Stag was planned for the Triumph 2.5 pi engine; didn't fit...............doh.