Rolling Road results from the Growl
Discussion
Add your name and the figures... It's always interesting to see the results of Mod's etc 
To add to the list I think you quote it... copy and past the previouse line adding your name and details.. and remove the quote bits top and bottom... or at least thats how I've done it before
.. just preview before submitting to see its worked 

To add to the list I think you quote it... copy and past the previouse line adding your name and details.. and remove the quote bits top and bottom... or at least thats how I've done it before
.. just preview before submitting to see its worked 
| Name | BHP | LBF |
|---|---|---|
| FFG | 275.4 | 340 |
| TVR Beaver | 0 | 0 |
Edited by TVR Beaver on Tuesday 9th July 23:57
K4000JB said:
Can someone add me please 321.3bhp on a poorly overfueling Griff. No idea of torque and the run was abandonded at 5000rpm. 
If it's that poorly how did you get 321 BHP?... and from a 4 LTR 
nice air intakes BTW and twin plenum 
Edited by TVR Beaver on Wednesday 10th July 07:34
K4000JB said:
It was 321 bhp but as v8 griff has stated it was overfueling massively. Hope to have it sorted and back to the bbwf on sat to get a proper run for comparison.

rigga said:
Those numbers on face value can't be right ....
I agree, I can't see that being right. When mine was overfuelling the torque was high but the bhp was well down, that said I'd doubt that figure from a 4.0 even if it was running well.
LordGrover said:
Cripes! That's prodigious power even for a 450. Nice one. 
Thank you sir 
As its been proved years ago getting the air in is where the power is, I cant for the life of me see why people are still trying to make power with the airflow meter and a single pipe to the plenum, when it was proved back then that even supplying a bored out single plenum needed 2 pipes to feed it to achieve this sort of power.
Just my view ofcourse.
Edited by K4000JB on Wednesday 10th July 15:44
LordGrover said:
Cripes! That's prodigious power even for a 450. Nice one. 
Thank you sir 
As its been proved years ago getting the air in is where the power is, I cant for the life of me see why people are still trying to make power with the airflow meter and a single pipe to the plenum, when it was proved back then that even supplying a bored out single plenum needed 2 pipes to feed it to achieve this sort of power.
Just my view ofcourse.
Edited by K4000JB on Wednesday 10th July 15:44
Gassing Station | Griffith | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




