XJ-c 4.2
Author
Discussion

HaylingJag

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

174 months

Saturday 27th July 2013
quotequote all
people of vast Jaguar knowledge,

i have just acquired a very tidy XJ coupe of '77 vintage and will need to put a "bit" of petrol in it, could anyone tell me if it can run on unleaded? it has been laid up for 10 years and has only just been woken from its coma. The vendor has done the tank and filters but i am unsure what to feed it.
It runs fine on whats in it now, presumably unleaded but i dont want to risk any long term damage by using the wrong fuel.

thanks in advance
Darren

varsas

4,073 posts

228 months

Saturday 27th July 2013
quotequote all
My car has the same engine.

I don't actually know BUT it's got alloy heads so the valves seats must be inserts so should cope. Right? I also think the lazy nature of the engine means valve seat recession is unlikely...as I say I await to be corrected.

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

236 months

Saturday 27th July 2013
quotequote all
The XK engine was designed for 4 or 5 star fuel. What we buy now is two star.

I would take advice from an XK engine expert - the valve seats are inserts in the head so don't require the additional lead for lubrication but you may need to retard the ignition timing from the factory setting to avoid detonation.

HaylingJag

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

174 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies men, it will be in for an MoT this week so I will get it checked out then,

Darren

varsas

4,073 posts

228 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
My understanding is that you should run any classic on super unleaded (shell or esso) as it has less ethanol in it. The fact that it's higher octane too just makes it even better.

a8hex

5,832 posts

249 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
My breathed on 4.2 engine has always seemed very happy of Tesco's 99 Octane stuff, other than that super unleaded is fine. As Jaguar Steve says, the head is alloy so it always had hardened inserts for the valve seats. Is most cars where the valve seat is just cut into cast iron than have a problem with unleaded.

Jagmanv12

1,573 posts

190 months

Monday 29th July 2013
quotequote all
It's not the octane rating or valve seat problem that you need to consider these days but ethanol content.

I've read somewhere that all Shell petrol contains ethanol. A nuisance as most of the petrol stations in my area are Shell. However I understand that BP Super Unleaded does not contain ethanol so that's what I use in my 70's Jag.

HaylingJag

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

174 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
Thanks Guys,

off to the MoT station today, gave it a bit of a scrub up at the weekend and it aint too shabby. Wait and see whats required.

HaylingJag

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

174 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

236 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
That looks really rather lick to me...

HaylingJag

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

174 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
Cheers Steve,
MoT report back today, fundamentally solid though some welding required to the seatbelt anchorage points, floor needs plating up a bit though it hasn't spread out to the sills so a relatively easy repair. Windscreen washer doesn't deliver enough water, hey ho! All in all not too bad

Anyone know a good welder local to Hayling?

Darren

varsas

4,073 posts

228 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
a8hex said:
My breathed on 4.2 engine has always seemed very happy of Tesco's 99 Octane stuff, other than that super unleaded is fine. As Jaguar Steve says, the head is alloy so it always had hardened inserts for the valve seats. Is most cars where the valve seat is just cut into cast iron than have a problem with unleaded.
I'd be worried about the ethanol content in that stuff.

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

236 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
Yes Ethanol content in fuel needs investigating too as you may end up with component failure in the fuel systems of some older cars due to incompatibility with the higher ethanol content of modern fuels. All you need is a failed seal leading to a fuel leak in the wrong place and your P&J will be no more.

I'd be just as concerned about octane rating. 99 Octane fuel is roughly equivalent to 4 star which most later versions of the XK engine will run on, but it lacks the lead content that used to be added to reduce detonation so you'll still have the possibility of pre ignition which is ruinious.

You'll need to get the engine timing spot on and possibily set the fuel mixture slightly richer under lighter loads than the factory settings and make sure the vacuum advance on the distributor is not over advancing under high vacuum conditions. Ideally I'd bin the AED and fit a manual choke conversion, make sure everything on the fuel/ignition systems are working correctly then go for a full diagnostic or even rolling road session with somebody who really knows what they are doing with the XK lump just to optimise everything.

You won't always hear the classic pinking under lightish load if something is not quite right, detonation can be silent and lead to burnt valves and melted piston crowns. Don't ask me how I know this I just do frown

HaylingJag

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

174 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
confused

Maybe I should just throw in the charged 6 pot from the wife's XJr , could save me a lot of grieftongue out

a8hex

5,832 posts

249 months

Wednesday 31st July 2013
quotequote all
Jaguar steve said:
I'd be just as concerned about octane rating. 99 Octane fuel is roughly equivalent to 4 star which most later versions of the XK engine will run on, but it lacks the lead content that used to be added to reduce detonation so you'll still have the possibility of pre ignition which is ruinious.
I'm very sorry JS, but I really don't think that is how octane ratings work.
The old star rating system of BS4040 rated 5star as 100 Octane and 4 star at 98 Octane. These ratings have nothing to do with their chemical composition and instead based on the knock resistance of fuel used in a standardised engine running at a defined temperature, pressure and engine speed. The standard engine is a funny looking single cylinder jobby I seem to recall.
In the UK we normally measure the octane rating using a RON figure, a "Research Octane Number".
So a 98 octane leaded fuel has exactly the same knock resistance as 98 octane unleaded fuel. Under the standardised test conditions.

The ethanol issue is entirely separate. It alters the chemical composition of the fuel which means it interacts differently with other parts of the fuel system in a different way. Potential dissolving things that are aren't soluble in traditional petrol. But petrol is a damn good solvent. Discussing this with US based owners of XKs who've been forced into using ethanol infected gasoline for much longer than we have in the UK, they don't seem to report any issues. The biggest fear seems to be with fuel "ageing" over winter. Traditional petrol naturally repels water, whilst adding ethanol to the petrol means that it will absorb some water.

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

236 months

Thursday 1st August 2013
quotequote all
a8hex said:
Jaguar steve said:
I'd be just as concerned about octane rating. 99 Octane fuel is roughly equivalent to 4 star which most later versions of the XK engine will run on, but it lacks the lead content that used to be added to reduce detonation so you'll still have the possibility of pre ignition which is ruinious.
I'm very sorry JS, but I really don't think that is how octane ratings work.
The old star rating system of BS4040 rated 5star as 100 Octane and 4 star at 98 Octane. These ratings have nothing to do with their chemical composition and instead based on the knock resistance of fuel used in a standardised engine running at a defined temperature, pressure and engine speed. The standard engine is a funny looking single cylinder jobby I seem to recall.
In the UK we normally measure the octane rating using a RON figure, a "Research Octane Number".
So a 98 octane leaded fuel has exactly the same knock resistance as 98 octane unleaded fuel. Under the standardised test conditions.

No need to apologise. thumbup

Yes, I know about the variable compression single cylinder engine used to determine the point at which detonation or knock occurs to determine the RON number for any batch of fuel. I made the point - possibily not very well - about octane ratings to highlight the fact that normal unleaded fuel is both a lower octane rating than most variants of the XK engine were designed for and does not have the lead added to increase the point at which detonation occurs. Detonation can be silent - it's not always just a little audible pinking and needs to be taken seriously as it can result in significant engine damage.

The ethanol issue is entirely separate. It alters the chemical composition of the fuel which means it interacts differently with other parts of the fuel system in a different way. Potential dissolving things that are aren't soluble in traditional petrol. But petrol is a damn good solvent. Discussing this with US based owners of XKs who've been forced into using ethanol infected gasoline for much longer than we have in the UK, they don't seem to report any issues. The biggest fear seems to be with fuel "ageing" over winter. Traditional petrol naturally repels water, whilst adding ethanol to the petrol means that it will absorb some water.
Yes I agree - Ethanol is a seperate matter. I had read concerns in the classic car press about increasing Ethanol content of fuel but had no idea how much a XK engine of the OP's age would be affected - your XK of course being of a different decade may be affected in a very different way regarding fuel leaks and that will depend on material compatibility whilst the affinity of higher Ethanol content fuel to adsorb moisture will remain the same regardless of which car/lawnmower/boat fuel tank it's put in.

BTW it's my understanding most piston engined light aircraft run on 100 octane leaded fuel - perhaps that'd be the best diet of all for an XK engine smile

SkepticSteve

3,598 posts

220 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
It may have changed, but when posted on PH some time back, SHELL was the only supplier who would not answer the question about Ethanol.

I suspect that SHELL has added it to all their grades of fuel??

But ESSO super does NOT have any Ethanol in it here in the South Eastern part of the country.
Same for Texaco and Total and BP.

ALL 95 fuel across the whole country has ethanol added!

So use Esso, Texaco, Total or BP super as it all comes from the same place apparently.

I would also suggest that at that age, any soft fuel lines are suspect and that you replace them with ethanol tolerant alternatives anyway.

However, when asked Jaguar said all thier cars can run ethanol based fuels (no age was given though) and I believe this is because they have been exporting to the USA for a long time and the USA has had ethanol fuel also for a very long time.

Good luck with the car, it certainly looks nice!

HaylingJag

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

174 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
thanks Steve, i have an ESSO local to me so im sure i can feed it copious amounts of Super from there. She's coming along nicely, in for some welding on wednesday then i can start tidying her up. Leather has cleaned up ok, though i need the headlining replaced. i can get get a carpet set online quite reasonably so interior not too much of a problem. Chrome and paint renovation will be a longer term project!!

D

woody68

139 posts

223 months

Wednesday 7th August 2013
quotequote all
Oooh I'm liking the look of your new toy Darren ..

Can't wait to see it at a meet soon my friend ;-)


tortop45

434 posts

186 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Stick some kent wheels on it,pepper pots just don,t suit it.