Which portrait prime for crop body?
Which portrait prime for crop body?
Author
Discussion

pstruck

Original Poster:

3,540 posts

278 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
I want to buy a new portrait prime lens for my Canon 50D, but don't know which I'll be happy with. I know many will immediately suggest a nice little 'nifty fifty', but I've had both the 50 f1.8 mkII and an f1.4, which although both great lenses I found a little too long for what I wanted. They would be perfect on a full frame body, but on my crop body I found I wanted a little wider.

So of the various 28's, 30's and 35's which gets the vote on here? Before anyone suggests it though, I can't afford 'L glass' this time, so although the cheaper lenses are no doubt a compromise on quality, which will give me the best IQ and VFM? Reviews I've read so far are rather mixed.

Pints

18,451 posts

223 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
I'll be watching this thread with interest. I also find my 50mm a bit long for some shots (Canon 60D) and have been pondering a second prime too.

rottie102

4,033 posts

213 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
Sigma 30mm f/1.4

Just under £300 brand new

Edited by rottie102 on Sunday 28th July 12:56

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

291 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
Pints said:
I'll be watching this thread with interest. I also find my 50mm a bit long for some shots (Canon 60D) and have been pondering a second prime too.
Yep!

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

291 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
rottie102 said:
Sigma 30mm f/1.4

Just under £300 brand new

Edited by rottie102 on Sunday 28th July 12:56
Not wanting to start a flamer but have the

1. supposed quality "issues" been addressed

2. if your DSLR does not support AF tuning, can the 1.4 aperture not, in certain dof instances, work against you?


I don't know if these points are still pertinent with the current build, but they have been raised before on the 'net.

cheers

Mo.

ones enough!


Edited by Mojocvh on Sunday 28th July 16:27

ian in lancs

3,853 posts

227 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
A portrait (head / shoulders) lens for me is 85 to 105mm on a full frame and I use a macro version of both and I use a 70-200 a lot too. So on a crop body shortest i'd go is 50 (75) and preferably 70mm (105) or 85mm (127). If you intend to shoot ambient choose a fast one. If youre likely to go flash / studio than 2.9 if fast enough.

Sorry, being a Nikon user I dont know the Canon stuff but those are the focal lengths I use the most.

I did use a 50-150 sigma in the early days on a crop; perfect range - very sharp after sigma had fettled it!

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

291 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
very sharp after sigma had fettled it!

thanks for that, so I didn't imagine it!!

budfox

1,510 posts

158 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
I'd have thought that a fast 50mm prime on a cropped body was the perfect portrait lens. For me on a FX I find my 85mm 1.8 to be spot on.

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

232 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
I'd echo other comments, for portraits a 50mm / 85mm would be perfect, but if you prefer a wider prime (and dont plan on going ff any time soon) then i'd go with the Sigma 30mm f1.4.

pstruck

Original Poster:

3,540 posts

278 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
Thanks for the comments so far. I appreciate that for some of you a 50 is just right, but for what I want it to do it is a bit too long, hence the request. I'm not just using it for head and shoulders portraits. A lot of what I'm doing is indoors, so the faster the better, butalso because it's indoors getting far enough away from the subject with a 50 can be an issue, which is why I want something more like 28 to 35mm. This would prove a more versatile length for me, which would get more use and therefore be better VFM.

JustinMinns

262 posts

250 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
budfox said:
I'd have thought that a fast 50mm prime on a cropped body was the perfect portrait lens. For me on a FX I find my 85mm 1.8 to be spot on.
Agreed, 50mm on a crop is a good portrait lens

pstruck

Original Poster:

3,540 posts

278 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
I'm not knocking the abilities of the little 50's, as I said, I've had a couple and they are great lenses, but I want something a little wider. Perhaps I should remove the word 'portrait' from the question. Come on fellas, don't answer my question with a lens I said I've already tried and found to not suit what I want it for.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
Sigma 35/1.4mm art lens.

Best 35 on the market and you can us the USB dock to fine tune the at

Speed addicted

6,326 posts

256 months

Sunday 28th July 2013
quotequote all
I use the Canon 35mm f2 as I was finding the 50mm a bit too long for portrait stuff if I couldn't get far enough back.
It's very sharp and focuses more accurately than the 50mm.


andy-xr

13,204 posts

233 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
I work on the basis of 35mm for anything where I need to get the person and a bit of scene in, 50mm for 3/4 lengths and 85mm+ for headshots