Job application direct or via agent

[contractor]

For a senior permanent position listed on a company job portal, do HR departments have a preference to direct or via-agency applications?

I'm thinking it doesn't really matter as the CV will do the talking (to get to the interview stage) and the seniority of the role will offset the agency fee. It might also benefit the candidate as the agent might be able to negotiate better package terms.

Can I get an opinion from someone in the know?

Thanks

[edc]

There is no right or wrong answer. If there are 'marginal' candidates then depending on the relationship with the recruiter I will listen if they vehemently disagree with the decision. With some recruiters we will interview almost all their candidates with very little initial/CV vetting on our part. clearly this is more likely if they are working those roles exclusively and know your business. Those recruiters who also have a good hit ratio will also get 'trusted adviser' status.

[Kudos]

agents are s

[spikeyhead]

Kudos said:

agents are s

That's not entirely true. Agents are salespeople, and some are pushy and full of ste. A few play the longer game.

For this, I'd go direct unless I knew the agent had an excellent relationship with the client.

[Arenki]

Kudos said:

agents are s

ok mate!

[Kudos]

Arenki said:

ok mate!

Quick straw pole around an office of 40 odd contractors - results are conclusive.

[Siscar]

We give preference to direct applicants because we don't need to pay a percentage to the agent is one isn't involved.

[contractor]

I'm talking multinational, 6 figure salary, permanent position if it helps.

[Siscar]

You say it's listed on a company job portal, does it not say how to apply?