Why is it that.....
Author
Discussion

e600

Original Poster:

1,522 posts

181 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Why is it that when you see still photographs of large numbers of men from 40 or 50 years ago, (or longer still) very few men were bald. I am thinking of picutres of soldiers from WW 2 or similar large gatherings of men.

Today if you view, say, a football crowd or similar lots are bald or nearly so. When I was a young 'un only old men were bald.

Is it diet, something in the water or evolution.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
More people shaving their heads when they go a little bald.


LordGrover

34,155 posts

241 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
And hats. Or lack thereof.

Kiltie

7,505 posts

275 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Could it perhaps be that the average age of the groups you're looking at is a bit younger than you'd expect the same sample to be today?

evo4a

737 posts

210 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
comb over

mu0n

2,348 posts

162 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
Kiltie said:
Could it perhaps be that the average age of the groups you're looking at is a bit younger than you'd expect the same sample to be today?
This.

Average age of football crowd = late 30's?
Average age of WW2 soldiers = guessing around 21?

LordGrover

34,155 posts

241 months

Thursday 8th August 2013
quotequote all
WWII was little longer ago than 40-50 years though.
Cripes! I'm over 50 and was taught about the war in history classes.