Road tax....I'm confused
Road tax....I'm confused
Author
Discussion

valhalla

Original Poster:

2,246 posts

285 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
Morning all. I received today two reminders that the road tax was due on two of our cars.But when i read the amount for each car it confused me some what.Perhaps you can fill me in why this is. My wife's 1.8 2004 MX5 Road tax for 6 months is £154.00. Whilst our 2003 Tuscan Mk 1 is only(i use that term lightly)£123.00 for 6 months.Why is the Tuscan so much cheaper than the Mazda.The Mazda is also entitled a 'Petrol car' with 210 g/km.Whilst the Tuscan is entitled Private/light goods vehicle with no g/km listed at all.Should i contact the DVLA,or best not rock the boat?
Cheers guys..........Dave

Barry Ashcroft

1,958 posts

250 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
TVRs were never tested for co emissions so there done on the old system of engine size. Think yourself lucky my 55 is 490 per year

wongthecorrupter

2,766 posts

200 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
my mates 2002 clio 172 is more to tax than my 2001 4 litre Tuscan.

V8 GRF

7,299 posts

239 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
valhalla said:
Should i contact the DVLA,or best not rock the boat?
The car is listed correctly all TVRs were classed as PLG. There were some incorrectly registered under the standard CO2 system and there are threads on here discussing the lengthy and painful process of getting them assigned to PLG.

On no account should you raise this with the DVLA.

plasticman

907 posts

280 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
Agreed . or you may end up in Valhalla !

Lone Star

138 posts

211 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
I've probably dreamt this up. But I thought it was an arrangement the government had with car manufacture's that if they produced cars in relative small numbers. To help in this instance, TVR, compete with the 'bigger boys', they would waiver the normal method of taxing the car. So that punters like you and me were more likely to buy new, knowing that the road tax would be a lot cheaper than if we were to buy an equivalent car from Ferrari, BMW, Ford etc.

valhalla

Original Poster:

2,246 posts

285 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
wongthecorrupter said:
my mates 2002 clio 172 is more to tax than my 2001 4 litre Tuscan.
My lips are sealed.Ta for all your answers guys.
Davecensored

bionicjim

473 posts

168 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
My wife's
Mini Cooper John works is £350 a year

steveT350C

6,728 posts

190 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
I thought is had something to do with fact that TVRs are classed as hand built?

bionicjim

473 posts

168 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
Low prediction cars
That's what I was led to believe

Steve_D

13,802 posts

287 months

Saturday 10th August 2013
quotequote all
TVRs along with Kitcars and other low volume manufacture cannot demonstrate that every car they produce will perform (emissions) in the same way. They are also not in a position to cover the huge costs involved in proving the emissions figures. On that basis they are classed PLG.

My 7.6 litre Ultima is classed PLG and is also 'Visual smoke only’ for MOT.....result.
Steve

valhalla

Original Poster:

2,246 posts

285 months

Sunday 11th August 2013
quotequote all
bionicjim said:
Low prediction cars
That's what I was led to believe
I like that"Low prediction cars" they certainly are that.
Daveread