Naming and Shaming - What about Naming and Praising
Naming and Shaming - What about Naming and Praising
Author
Discussion

ferrisbueller

Original Poster:

30,309 posts

256 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
PH has very clear rules on naming and shaming, there's a sticky and everything.

However, similar potentially unfounded statements of praise and recommendation appear to be fair game.

Given that frequently specifics and facts aren't offered up, nor validated, and often there could be underlying vested interests on behalf of any posters (potential that this is traders bigging each other up) is something going to be put in place to check/reduce/stop this in the same way Naming and Shaming stops the opposite?

The N&S policy appears to protect the website, rather than the punter. The above potentially exposes people to greater risk.

Just a thought.

slippery

14,093 posts

268 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Yes, but no company is going to litigate against Haymarket for someone praising them.

ferrisbueller

Original Poster:

30,309 posts

256 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
That's kind of the point I was making.

So that makes it OK?

slippery

14,093 posts

268 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
I think so. One of the most valuable parts of the forum can be the referrals you can get from other members when you are looking for a product or service. It's then up to you to decide how reliable the people posting the referral are. This can generally be done by checking their posting history, or by numerous other members chipping in to endorse that view.

ferrisbueller

Original Poster:

30,309 posts

256 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
I'd be inclined to agree if it were a naturally balanced debate. However, if people who have poor experiences aren't allowed to post then it's all one way traffic.

slippery

14,093 posts

268 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Better than no traffic at all IMHO. smile

Stuart

11,639 posts

280 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
The mods look very closely at apparently random effusive praise to make sure that it isn't advertising in disguise, but it can be hard to spot.

As said though, the reality is that we aren't likely to get sued for false praise, but might well do for false criticism. Since we've no way of verifying the latter, we've always taken the view that it must go.

Hard I know, but there's no easy alternative and I often think that silence speaks volumes, whereas if one person has had good service from a company they aren't usually alone.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

246 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
Well I think Haymarket are wonderful for letting us do this. Autocar can't be beaten and I feel so blessed Pistonheads is, due to Haymarket being excellent, in the same stable as it, along with other fantastic Haymarket publications Druck&Medien and Horticultural Week. We're frankly, thanks to Haymarket, spoiled by it all. The only thing I feel left out of, probably not really Haymarket's fault, coz they are ACE, is that we don't get Renal & Urology News or Oncology Nurse Advisor, as Haymarket in their excellence could really treat us with those this side of the pond.


s p a c e m a n

12,044 posts

177 months

Monday 12th August 2013
quotequote all
To be honest, you would be mental to craftily praise or just speak up a company that you are associated with on here, every time that I have seen someone do it they have been ripped to shreds and then outed as being associated within a couple of pages hehe