Peugeot 106 Rallye: PH Carpool
A tidy, unmolested 106 Rallye was too much to turn down for this PHer - who can blame him?

Car: Peugeot 106 Rallye S2 Bianca White
Owned since: August 2013
Previously owned: BMW M3s, M5, 1 M Coupe, JCW Minis
Why I bought it:
"Wife had a 106 GTI in the late 90s. I remember what fun it was. Wanted weekend alternative to my C63. Inspired to hunt for one by recent Chris Harris piece on a mint S1 Rallye."
What I wish I'd known:
"That I'd get a mysterious urge to rag around town centre car parks. And just how heavy the steering is. Modern cars have made me soft. I'm getting used to it though."
Things I love:
"Rarity, only 500 S2 Rallyes were imported to the UK in right-hand drive - 250 blue and 250 white. The compact dimensions and simplicity. Its lack of frippery - creature comforts extend to heating, rear screen demister and a cigarette lighter. And I don't smoke. There's no central locking or electric windows. It's a clear illustration of how much extra kit we now like to have in our cars. It needs a completely different driving style in order to get the best from it. I'm having fun relearning my local roads."
Things I hate:
"Maybe parking with the heavy steering but that's about it. I bought it as a second car and am willing to indulge it a little. I think keeping it properly clean might be a struggle."
Costs:
"Very little so far. Insurance worked out at £20.00. I switched to a Multicar policy with Admiral and got a £300.00 discount on my C63!"
Where I've been:
"Spirited drives in my local area. Was half thinking of leaving it at our holiday home in Cornwall as it would be great on the roads around there. I wouldn't get to drive it enough though."
What next:
"Try to keep it clean, maybe get the wheels refurbished and put the front bumper on straight. Enjoy simple motoring again."

Only things to watch out for on these is rot - the shells are starting to get a bit ropy and need some TLC in one or two places. Thankfully it's usually the non-cosmetic bits that get tinworm, so they can be sorted relatively cheaply, but need doing before they go too far.
ETA: If you want really heavy steering try a Quaife quick-rack.

Picked it up from Glanden Motors in Preston at midnight on the 1st August.
Only when I'd sold it 18 months later did I realise how good it was because I always secretly wished I'd bought an XSI.
If only I knew then what I know now!
N441 ECW where are you?
Eventually I gave up and bought a BRM Rover instead.
Eventually I gave up and bought a BRM Rover instead.
Regarding the state of these in 2013, a few do need welding, particularly S1's, but as mentioned the structural points tend to be pretty hardy! I've not seen very many at all with body modifications, other than dealer fit colour coded spoilers. I wouldn't go for a 16v conversion myself, despite it's popularity. Part of the joy of the 8v engine is how much it needs it's neck wringing to get the best from it, with all it's power at the top end of the rev range. The 16v will make it faster, with a more linear power delivery but it loses that fantastically manic character, and for a sake of a few bhp I'd rather savour that grin inducing moment when it comes on cam, and the induction note coalesces into a hard buzz-saw tone.
I've had mine since February, and it is remarkable in that, for such a small and simple car, it sturdily protects me from lusting after much else.



At 00:53...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lF753HLZKhk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw2uPJjlqQg
The real gem is a the ph1. Specifically developed engine for the car with a high revving 100bhp 1300 engine. They felt like someone had shoved a firework up your ass.
The ph2 as nice as it is has a leggy feeling and long gearing.
I think it's overcomplicated modern cars that dull the senses. The 106 is a good car but its the ph1 that's king here.
The real gem is a the ph1. Specifically developed engine for the car with a high revving 100bhp 1300 engine. They felt like someone had shoved a firework up your ass.
The ph2 as nice as it is has a leggy feeling and long gearing.
I think it's overcomplicated modern cars that dull the senses. The 106 is a good car but its the ph1 that's king here.
Drove an S2 for the AutoExpress article and really thought it was fairly uninspiring to drive.
S1 with the 1.3 engine was an absolute nutter car to drive much more fun.
But suppose its like the 205 GTI 1.6 vs 1.9 debate could go on forever!!

The real gem is a the ph1. Specifically developed engine for the car with a high revving 100bhp 1300 engine. They felt like someone had shoved a firework up your ass.
The ph2 as nice as it is has a leggy feeling and long gearing.
I think it's overcomplicated modern cars that dull the senses. The 106 is a good car but its the ph1 that's king here.
The cars drive relatively similarly, with the S1 feeling slightly more powerful at the top end and having 200rpm more to play with, whilst the S2 made use of the larger capacity engine with a broader spread of torque across the range, though it is still definitely a revvy engine and will attract cries of "where is the torque!?!?!?!" if you're not in the right gear. I prefer the looks of the S1, though the S2 makes for a better toy on the road as it is a little more tractable. I suspect the S1 may be more fun on track, where you are afforded the sight lines to keep it stirred right at the redline!
If you were buying one now though, I'd advise you look at both models and buy the best of either that you can find, as they are all 'old' now, their numbers have dwindled significantly and a lot of them are suffering from rust.
ETA: On the 205 GTi argument, I'm pretty firmly in the 1.9 camp...I think!
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff










