Verbally Abusing Plod
Author
Discussion

roadsweeper

Original Poster:

3,789 posts

297 months

Thursday 21st October 2004
quotequote all
A recent comment by a PH copper asking me why I didn't call a policeman who attempted to charge with dangeours driving a prck to his face rather than on PH got me thinking... I understand that it is actually an offence to swear at a police officer, so quite apart from being rude and certainly asking for trouble in that I'm sure my car would have been checked for any possible fault, would I have been in bovver? What constitutes commiting such an offence - are certain words OK?

I know a guy (ego on legs ) who called a policeman a semi-literate moron when pulled over but nothing was done about it other than the speeding ticket he was being issued anyway.

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Thursday 21st October 2004
quotequote all
A lot depends on where you are and the police officer in question...

As BiB are human (true ) different Bobbies have different tollerance levels...

I've known many drivers start on a course of actions that they wish they hadn't. Ending up being arrested for a public order offence, several hours in the cells and then a court appearance for both behaviour and the motoring offence.

There is also the chance that the BiB might find something else wrong with your vehicle, should he be verbally abused by you.

In addition, the offer of a fixed penalty is only an offer. If your behaviour leads the police officer to the conclusion that the ticket isn't the best option, then you'll get reported on summons instead. Possibility of a higher fine and court costs.

Finally, there are some BiB who take it greatly to heart and would make sure future speed checks just happen to be carried out on the roads that you use to and from home or place of work.

Those are my views off the top of my head.

Street

Obviously, I would treat every member of the public with fairness, integrity, respect, and professionalism

roadsweeper

Original Poster:

3,789 posts

297 months

Thursday 21st October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
Obviously, I would treat every member of the public with fairness, integrity, respect, and professionalism

Obviously.

Thanks for the reply. So, if I had called the copper a prck would I have actually committed an offence or just invited detailed scrutiny of every area of my car or the other alternatives you outlined?

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Thursday 21st October 2004
quotequote all
roadsweeper said:

Streetcop said:
Obviously, I would treat every member of the public with fairness, integrity, respect, and professionalism


Obviously.

Thanks for the reply. So, if I had called the copper a prck would I have actually committed an offence or just invited detailed scrutiny of every area of my car or the other alternatives you outlined?


He would have to warn you under section 5 of the public order act. If you continued, you'd get arrested.

Plus the other outlined things...

Personally, I can't see the use in verbally abusing BiB. Before I was a copper, I was in the military for several years and travelled all over. Being rude to the old bill never won you any favours and you always lost in the long run.

Street

roadsweeper

Original Poster:

3,789 posts

297 months

Thursday 21st October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
roadsweeper said:
Thanks for the reply. So, if I had called the copper a prck would I have actually committed an offence or just invited detailed scrutiny of every area of my car or the other alternatives you outlined?


He would have to warn you under section 5 of the public order act. If you continued, you'd get arrested.

Plus the other outlined things...

OK, thanks.

Streetcop said:
Personally, I can't see the use in verbally abusing BiB. Before I was a copper, I was in the military for several years and travelled all over. Being rude to the old bill never won you any favours and you always lost in the long run.

I totally agree - abusing a police officer, even if it were 'deserved', would be stupid and it's a lose/lose situation. This is exactly the reason I didn't call the guy a prck to his face! I feel much better for having vented my righteous indignation on PH though.

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Thursday 21st October 2004
quotequote all
I'm glad...

I'm also pleased that you aren't the type to jump on the whining/bleating bandwagon..

Your subsequent reflection of the incident is a credit to you...

Street

g_attrill

8,736 posts

269 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:

He would have to warn you under section 5 of the public order act. If you continued, you'd get arrested.

Isn't there case law that states that a police officer can't be harassed/alarmed/distressed by swearing? I think I read that swearing at police officers can only be dealt with by S5 if there are public in the vicinity likely to be affected.

Not that I would want to try this...

Gareth

medicineman

1,817 posts

260 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
Why abuse anyone? I've had it in the neck soooo many times for doing my job. Step back and think. We all have a job to do, sometimes it may not be what the public wants. Personally I think giving a copper abuse when s/he can arrest you is bad judgement. I'm sure if a few of my patients thought an arrest, potential physical pain and a night in the cells was the result they would keep their mouths shut and threats or violence to themselves.

Alice Cupra

1,034 posts

260 months

Friday 22nd October 2004
quotequote all
S5 Public Order Act 1986 states

"A person is guilty of an offence if he/she uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress by such action.

There is no requirement that the conduct should be directed towards any person."

It has actually been held in court that a police officer CAN be harassed, alarmed or distressed by this behaviour, even if there are no other members of the public present.

Following on from Streetcop's comment on being given a warning, and then arrested if you continue, the action doesn't have to be the same as the one they warned you about for you to be arrested!

deltaf

6,806 posts

276 months

Saturday 23rd October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
Obviously, I would treat every member of the public with fairness, integrity, respect, and professionalism


Do stop being so fecking Politically correct man. Youre getting right up my ample chuff with it....

mel

10,168 posts

298 months

Saturday 23rd October 2004
quotequote all
mungo said:

Alice Cupra said:
S5 Public Order Act 1986 states

"A person is guilty of an offence if he/she uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress by such action.





Yep - nicked a few for that on a Fri / Sat night


Poor old Mungo, maybe you are in the wrong job if you feel harassed, alarmed and distressed by being called and short, bald, jumped up twat.......perhaps a slightly thicker coat of skin might be order..

gone

6,649 posts

286 months

Saturday 23rd October 2004
quotequote all
Alice Cupra said:
S5 Public Order Act 1986 states


Following on from Streetcop's comment on being given a warning, and then arrested if you continue, the action doesn't have to be the same as the one they warned you about for you to be arrested!



Or indeed the same officer who issued the initial warning!!!!


>> Edited by gone on Saturday 23 October 10:02

gone

6,649 posts

286 months

Saturday 23rd October 2004
quotequote all
mel said:



Poor old Mungo, maybe you are in the wrong job if you feel harassed, alarmed and distressed by being called and short, bald, jumped up twat.......perhaps a slightly thicker coat of skin might be order..



Section 5 is a recordable crime under the rules.

Police Officers are assessed on the performance they have regarding detections for crime.

Section 5 is a gift to a bib who is a bit short on detections!!!

SPEEDING is not a recordable crime. There are no Brownie points for nicking speeders. Only immense fun and satisfaction Mwahahahahahahahahahahaha!

>> Edited by gone on Saturday 23 October 10:07

turbobloke

115,888 posts

283 months

Saturday 23rd October 2004
quotequote all
gone said:
Section 5 is a recordable crime under the rules. SPEEDING is not a recordable crime. There are no Brownie points for nicking speeders. Only immense fun and satisfaction Mwahahahahahahahahahahaha!
[Dick Emery]oooh you are awful[/Dick Emery]

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Saturday 23rd October 2004
quotequote all
Morning Turbobloke...
Hope you are well..

Street

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Saturday 23rd October 2004
quotequote all

mel

10,168 posts

298 months

Monday 25th October 2004
quotequote all
Mungo, your reaction before you editted it was better go back to sleep

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 25th October 2004
quotequote all
The problem is Mel....too many coppers have thick skins and the scum on the street then feel it's ok to shout abuse out..

If it's not stamped on immediately..it gets worse...people passing by think..."Goodness, if that lout will shout and say all that to a policeman, what hope do we have?"...

Anti-social scum must be dealt with...it's nothing to do with thickness of skin..it's to do with the office of Constable.

Street

roadsweeper

Original Poster:

3,789 posts

297 months

Monday 25th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
If they're not stamped on immediately..they get worse...

I agree entirely.

Mad Dave

7,158 posts

286 months

Monday 25th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
The problem is Mel....too many coppers have thick skins and the scum on the street then feel it's ok to shout abuse out..


Street > I think maybe Mel's comments were made more because he dislikes Mr Mungo here, rather than that he thinks all officers should put up with abusive language.

As an aside, I was pulled over on Friday night - I pulled away in Warminster town centre without putting my lights on (quite well lit, just forgot - noticed within 50 yards though and put them on). The Copper was a bit of a miserable git, but polite enough and accepted my answers about where i'd been and where I was going. He also didn't breathalyse me which surprised me as although I told him I hadnt had a drink (the truth) I did tell him id just left a pub! Being pulled over though was not the unpleasant experience that many people paint it to be - I was polite to him, he was polite to me and I went on my merry way having lost only about 2 minutes of my time.