Insects, the best source of protein there is...
Discussion
We all know it. We've seen most other carnivores eat them and be in superb health. There's nothing to them except ooey gooey slimey protein already in it's most digestible form - guts with no major cellular hang-up, once you break through the crunchy outer shell. So much so you don't really have to chew, but squeeze and suck the goodness down with minimal ease.
Grasshoppers are 77% protein. It wipes the floor for everything you've ever swallowed by around 150%, even if you could imagine yourself as your own missus.
So who would?
http://www.sciencealert.com.au/features/20130409-2...
Not me. Not even if they were pealed to pulp by some chef paid at £10ph with a bucket of sugar to hand. I'll stick to chicken at a measly 25% protein and just eat more.
But seriously, Chicken v insects. What's the difference? It's not like you eat all the jibs of a chicken because someone has been paid to separate that out for you, so all you get is the goodness of breast.
Grasshoppers are 77% protein. It wipes the floor for everything you've ever swallowed by around 150%, even if you could imagine yourself as your own missus.

So who would?
http://www.sciencealert.com.au/features/20130409-2...
Not me. Not even if they were pealed to pulp by some chef paid at £10ph with a bucket of sugar to hand. I'll stick to chicken at a measly 25% protein and just eat more.
But seriously, Chicken v insects. What's the difference? It's not like you eat all the jibs of a chicken because someone has been paid to separate that out for you, so all you get is the goodness of breast.
mattikake said:
We all know it. We've seen most other carnivores eat them and be in superb health. There's nothing to them except ooey gooey slimey protein already in it's most digestible form - guts with no major cellular hang-up, once you break through the crunchy outer shell. So much so you don't really have to chew, but squeeze and suck the goodness down with minimal ease.
Grasshoppers are 77% protein. It wipes the floor for everything you've ever swallowed by around 150%, even if you could imagine yourself as your own missus.
So who would?
http://www.sciencealert.com.au/features/20130409-2...
Not me. Not even if they were pealed to pulp by some chef paid at £10ph with a bucket of sugar to hand. I'll stick to chicken at a measly 25% protein and just eat more.
But seriously, Chicken v insects. What's the difference? It's not like you eat all the jibs of a chicken because someone has been paid to separate that out for you, so all you get is the goodness of breast.
Blended in a shake, I'd try it. Grasshoppers are 77% protein. It wipes the floor for everything you've ever swallowed by around 150%, even if you could imagine yourself as your own missus.

So who would?
http://www.sciencealert.com.au/features/20130409-2...
Not me. Not even if they were pealed to pulp by some chef paid at £10ph with a bucket of sugar to hand. I'll stick to chicken at a measly 25% protein and just eat more.
But seriously, Chicken v insects. What's the difference? It's not like you eat all the jibs of a chicken because someone has been paid to separate that out for you, so all you get is the goodness of breast.
It's the eating the heads' bit that would gross me out. I mean, would you eat a whole chicken, brain, eyes, beak and all?
I someone gave me a pealed grasshopper that was just the abdomen bit, possibly... if I was paid... and blind-folded first... and told it was tofu or something... But the head? Ewwww!
You say not even if you were starving, but when you're starving you WILL eat anything, apparently.
I someone gave me a pealed grasshopper that was just the abdomen bit, possibly... if I was paid... and blind-folded first... and told it was tofu or something... But the head? Ewwww!
You say not even if you were starving, but when you're starving you WILL eat anything, apparently.
mattikake said:
I someone gave me a pealed grasshopper that was just the abdomen bit, possibly... if I was paid... and blind-folded first... and told it was tofu or something... But the head? Ewwww!
Then they would be like prawns/shrimp/etc.. yumI always imagine they cricket/locust ones would be sharp and crunchy (like prawn shells) and the grub ones would pop and burst. Eurrghh!
^ very true! Insects and prawns/shrimps/lobster etc. are the same arthropod family as insects, they just live in water instead of on land.
Anyone here not grossed out by looking at or touching live sea-based arthropods, but find land-based arthropods disgusting?
Why is that? A race memory from our early ancestors that insects usually mean a nasty bite or sting?
Anyone here not grossed out by looking at or touching live sea-based arthropods, but find land-based arthropods disgusting?
Why is that? A race memory from our early ancestors that insects usually mean a nasty bite or sting?
Gassing Station | Health Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff







