Vixen chassis
Vixen chassis
Author
Discussion

foxdog

Original Poster:

156 posts

264 months

Friday 6th September 2013
quotequote all

foxdog

Original Poster:

156 posts

264 months

GadgeS3C

4,684 posts

186 months

Friday 6th September 2013
quotequote all
Description suggests it's an M series chassis that will also fit a Vixen - I think that makes an S4?

Can any guru's spot if that's correct from the pics?

Edited by GadgeS3C on Friday 6th September 19:32

pridaux

4,974 posts

171 months

Friday 6th September 2013
quotequote all
I don't think its an M chassis looks like my S2 but I am not 100%
A

Cerberus90

1,553 posts

235 months

Friday 6th September 2013
quotequote all
Not an M chassis as it doesn't have the second tubes (above) at the front either side of the engine, (which make it awkward for filters on twin 40s).

The outrigger support bits look different too, and I think the diff cage area.

pridaux

4,974 posts

171 months

Friday 6th September 2013
quotequote all
I may be wrong and I am too lazy to go up the other garage to check but there are section of the M ones that are Square box section and I cant see any on this one without a tape measure I cant say S1 or S2 but probable S2 seller really should know what he paid £3500 for
A

ATE399J

732 posts

259 months

Friday 6th September 2013
quotequote all
Looks Vixen to me. But doesn't seem to have the "arch" the goes between the top longitudinals above the bellhousing. Would that make it an early one?

62GRANTIII

199 posts

215 months

Saturday 7th September 2013
quotequote all
Look at diff mounts !!!

Gnasher

113 posts

283 months

Saturday 7th September 2013
quotequote all
'Looks Vixen to me. But doesn't seem to have the "arch" the goes between the top longitudinals above the bellhousing. Would that make it an early one?'

Never mind it doesn't have the 'arch', it doesn't have any tube there!! Something not quite right.

SteveD

foxdog

Original Poster:

156 posts

264 months

Saturday 7th September 2013
quotequote all
The chassis is pre M, the S4 Vixen sits on a M Series chassis.

heightswitch

6,322 posts

272 months

Saturday 7th September 2013
quotequote all
You can tell the people that build cars from the ones that just talk about them!!

Its an incomplete Tuscan V6 chassis
It looks slightly bent at rear (may be an optical illusion) and is missing the rear chassis stiffeners and also the front hoop
It isn't a tuscan V8 chassis because it doesn't have the bolt in crossmember attachment brackets on the lower tubes for the removable x-member that sits under the bell housing of a V8.

The batswing is a poorly strengthened original out of symetry original and highlights how not to really mount a rear diff.

N.

daza

237 posts

304 months

Saturday 7th September 2013
quotequote all
Spot the difference.......

No Gearbox or Engine mounts

D

daza

237 posts

304 months

Saturday 7th September 2013
quotequote all
Spot the difference.......

No Gearbox or Engine mounts

D

pridaux

4,974 posts

171 months

Sunday 8th September 2013
quotequote all
heightswitch said:
You can tell the people that build cars from the ones that just talk about them!!

Its an incomplete Tuscan V6 chassis
It looks slightly bent at rear (may be an optical illusion) and is missing the rear chassis stiffeners and also the front hoop
It isn't a tuscan V8 chassis because it doesn't have the bolt in crossmember attachment brackets on the lower tubes for the removable x-member that sits under the bell housing of a V8.

The batswing is a poorly strengthened original out of symetry original and highlights how not to really mount a rear diff.

N.
Do you have a picture that sounds interesting
A

ATE399J

732 posts

259 months

Sunday 8th September 2013
quotequote all
heightswitch said:
You can tell the people that build cars from the ones that just talk about them!!

Its an incomplete Tuscan V6 chassis
It looks slightly bent at rear (may be an optical illusion) and is missing the rear chassis stiffeners and also the front hoop
It isn't a tuscan V8 chassis because it doesn't have the bolt in crossmember attachment brackets on the lower tubes for the removable x-member that sits under the bell housing of a V8.

The batswing is a poorly strengthened original out of symetry original and highlights how not to really mount a rear diff.

N.
My V6 has the bolt-in crossmember.

Monkeythree

522 posts

251 months

Sunday 8th September 2013
quotequote all
Vixen 2500

heightswitch

6,322 posts

272 months

Sunday 8th September 2013
quotequote all
Its not a 2500 chassis BUT!!

Technically it could be made to be. It can be used as a base for any vixen S2 S3 / Tuscan V6 / Vixen 2500 build.

For the record The base chassis LWB are all roughly the same, but Engine, diff mounts and some strengtheners / triangulation are different model to model

A new chassis will set you back the thick end of £3000 so if someone is prepared to go look, make sure it is a sound straight chassis etc etc then they could get themselves a bargain.

It wants mounts for whatever engine / gearbox the next owner wants. It has the diff mounts for the best option of diff which can be used as is or improved. It also wants a top tube, but again this is an easy bit to weld on.
It is currently closer to Tuscan V6 spec than vixen, but it may well have started out as a vixen...Who knows.

N.