Fuel economy
Author
Discussion

StreetDragster

Original Poster:

1,569 posts

241 months

Sunday 8th September 2013
quotequote all
Hey everyone,

Bit of an interesting data point for everyone, I certainly found it interesting.

Two runs to Silverstone and back yesterday @85mph, pulled 27.7mpg which I thought was very reasonable

Thanks
Matt

Edited by StreetDragster on Monday 9th September 11:16

Jarcy

1,559 posts

298 months

Sunday 8th September 2013
quotequote all
I don't think I'm getting anywhere near that, and I'm not sure why.
However I haven't bothered to measure for sure yet, as I haven't drained a tank without a little hooning to mess up the average.
My gripe is that I'm getting less than 200 miles out of a full tank down to 1/4 full, which is crap range.
A weekend jaunt over to France with my wife ended with an unnecessary hunt for an open fuel station on a sleepy Sunday evening.

Hollowpockets

5,909 posts

239 months

Sunday 8th September 2013
quotequote all
On track of course but i get 5mpg smile when used as road car it was about 25mpg.

dave sutton

213 posts

171 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
Mine's a 2.5 and for motorway cruising, if I stay below 80, I can get 30, on track it's about 11.

AMG Merc

11,955 posts

276 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
OP you misread your speedo - you meant 70 mph, right?! wink

StreetDragster

Original Poster:

1,569 posts

241 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
Errrr, yep, officer smile

Matt

andygtt

8,345 posts

287 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
used to get 30mpg average when the car was stock, thats all driving including motorway, backroads etc... its doing 20mpg with same driving now... still better than my M5 gets so cant grumble lol

AMG Merc

11,955 posts

276 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
It's generally been the accepted rule to allow for approx. 200 miles per tank (which allows for a little in reserve) and not to allow it to empty.

Mpg (generally an irrelevant measurement metric for such "toys") is between 15-30mpg - as we all drive differently smile

dave sutton

213 posts

171 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
AMG Merc said:
OP you misread your speedo - you meant 70 mph, right?! wink
yes, sorry, hit wrong key

Adrian W

15,101 posts

251 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
Since when did anyone give a st what their Noble does to the gallon (endurance racing accepted)

AMG Merc

11,955 posts

276 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
Adrian W said:
Since when did anyone give a st what their Noble does to the gallon (endurance racing accepted)
yes as said Adrian - an irrelevance!smile

TuxMan

9,011 posts

261 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
I try very hard not to actually know , I find I sleep better biggrin

JayHeal

265 posts

174 months

Monday 9th September 2013
quotequote all
Who cares about MPG
It's all about SPM - Smiles Per Mile
Works out much better biggrin

AMG Merc

11,955 posts

276 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
JayHeal said:
Who cares about MPG
It's all about SPM - Smiles Per Mile
Works out much better biggrin
According to the Ancient Order of Leancis Nobilus (original buried somewhere under a car-park in Leicester) it was know as "Grinnage".

dave sutton

213 posts

171 months

Tuesday 10th September 2013
quotequote all
In my case, it's a hangover from the days when cars had old-fashioned distributors and carburettors and no electronic diagnostics readouts. Monitoring fuel consumption could give an early indication of something going outside tolerance. Maybe an old habit but it served me well when I fitted new pylons and found my fuel consumption jumped 20%, I judged it to indicate I could take some angle off the wing.