Rolex Sub 16610LV advice - Anniversary or Hulk
Rolex Sub 16610LV advice - Anniversary or Hulk
Author
Discussion

aea730

Original Poster:

370 posts

226 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
Im about to dabble my toe into the Rolex pool. I feel I am missing out on something by not owning one. Having done a little research I have established that the anniversary one is no longer made and is the green non ceramic bezel with black dial. However the model is still made but with ceramic bezel and green dial (hulk, as it seems to be described)

In terms of desirability where do these 2 watches sit. Is it a fair presumption that the anniversary will in the future be worth more than the ongoing model. I will be honest in that I want the watch to retain its value and hopefully increase in value.

Any advice would be appreciated


Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
Which do you prefer?

HarrySmash

459 posts

170 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
Vvroom said:
Which do you prefer?
As above.
Personally, I'd go for the Hulk though as it differs more from the standard black dial/ bezel model.

westberks

1,462 posts

166 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
I have the anniversary and it is slightly less 'green' than the ceramic, which I find a bit too 'green'.

maybe stating the bleedin obvious but you need to try them both on as the newer version is nice but perhaps a tad marmite when compared to the standard black models.

Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
I anticipate the 16610 era (so the anniversary LV) model Subs will do better value-wise long term.

I'm not the sort to buy a watch for investment mind you, and I mention this only because OP asked.

I have a black 16610 and I prefer its proportions to the new ceramic Sub. From the strength of pre-owned prices, it seems like others think the same.

Bottom line- buy what you like. Both are lovely and you'll be a happy man either way.

ellroy

7,858 posts

256 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
Personally I dislke the anniversary, but like the Hulk.

The former looks, to my eye, a parts bin special aimed at cash on balance sheet rather than anything else. Its just not a cohesive design.

Hence, I'm looking at either the Hulk or Black/Blue GMT in the new year.

Disco You

3,749 posts

211 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
The anniversary is nicer in every way IMO.

sparkyhx

4,200 posts

235 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
Disco You said:
The anniversary is nicer in every way IMO.
Have to agree the kermit is far nicer than the hulk.

having said that I like the green face Milgauss - go figure

crostonian

2,427 posts

203 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
For me one of the big advantages of the ceramic bezel Subs, ie the Hulk, is the new clasp which is far more substantial than the crappy piece of pressed steel on the 16610s. Ultimately it's down to personal choice, the Hulk does seem to be holding it's money well and whenever they appear on the used market they soon seem to get snapped up.

Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
^ out of interest, ever heard of a per- ceramic era Rolex clasp failing? I'm sure there will be some but I don't know it to be an 'issue'. IMHO the perceived quality of a clasp shouldn't be a deal breaker either way.

I've had 6 and never had an issue. My current Sub is regularly put through its paces and there hasn't been an issue.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. The clasp on the newer models is more substantial, but so it should be- the head is chunkier and it is rather more expensive.

aea730

Original Poster:

370 posts

226 months

Wednesday 18th September 2013
quotequote all
Thanks folks. I am torn between the 2 so if it comes down to future value it seems the anniversary might be the more sound investment

westberks

1,462 posts

166 months

Thursday 19th September 2013
quotequote all
sparkyhx said:
Disco You said:
The anniversary is nicer in every way IMO.
Have to agree the kermit is far nicer than the hulk.

having said that I like the green face Milgauss - go figure
but the Milgauss is green glass rather than face, so much more subtle than the Hulk, probably the most subtle of the three green watches as there is only the hint of green from the glass.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

278 months

Thursday 19th September 2013
quotequote all
Disco You said:
The anniversary is nicer in every way IMO.
Agreed, Very happy with my LV, it's an interesting twist to a regular Sub. The hulk just looks a bit 'too' green in my opinion.

Put one of each on your wrist. Buy the one you like the most.

aea730

Original Poster:

370 posts

226 months

Friday 20th September 2013
quotequote all
Ive found a nice anniversary for sale at my sort of money so Im off over to cheshire with my wedge in hand tomorrow. Hopefully be on my wrist tomorrow!

HarrySmash

459 posts

170 months

Friday 20th September 2013
quotequote all
aea730 said:
Ive found a nice anniversary for sale at my sort of money so Im off over to cheshire with my wedge in hand tomorrow. Hopefully be on my wrist tomorrow!
Good work. Please post a couple of pics if all goes to plan