Rolex Sub 16610LV advice - Anniversary or Hulk
Discussion
Im about to dabble my toe into the Rolex pool. I feel I am missing out on something by not owning one. Having done a little research I have established that the anniversary one is no longer made and is the green non ceramic bezel with black dial. However the model is still made but with ceramic bezel and green dial (hulk, as it seems to be described)
In terms of desirability where do these 2 watches sit. Is it a fair presumption that the anniversary will in the future be worth more than the ongoing model. I will be honest in that I want the watch to retain its value and hopefully increase in value.
Any advice would be appreciated
In terms of desirability where do these 2 watches sit. Is it a fair presumption that the anniversary will in the future be worth more than the ongoing model. I will be honest in that I want the watch to retain its value and hopefully increase in value.
Any advice would be appreciated
I anticipate the 16610 era (so the anniversary LV) model Subs will do better value-wise long term.
I'm not the sort to buy a watch for investment mind you, and I mention this only because OP asked.
I have a black 16610 and I prefer its proportions to the new ceramic Sub. From the strength of pre-owned prices, it seems like others think the same.
Bottom line- buy what you like. Both are lovely and you'll be a happy man either way.
I'm not the sort to buy a watch for investment mind you, and I mention this only because OP asked.
I have a black 16610 and I prefer its proportions to the new ceramic Sub. From the strength of pre-owned prices, it seems like others think the same.
Bottom line- buy what you like. Both are lovely and you'll be a happy man either way.
For me one of the big advantages of the ceramic bezel Subs, ie the Hulk, is the new clasp which is far more substantial than the crappy piece of pressed steel on the 16610s. Ultimately it's down to personal choice, the Hulk does seem to be holding it's money well and whenever they appear on the used market they soon seem to get snapped up.
^ out of interest, ever heard of a per- ceramic era Rolex clasp failing? I'm sure there will be some but I don't know it to be an 'issue'. IMHO the perceived quality of a clasp shouldn't be a deal breaker either way.
I've had 6 and never had an issue. My current Sub is regularly put through its paces and there hasn't been an issue.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. The clasp on the newer models is more substantial, but so it should be- the head is chunkier and it is rather more expensive.
I've had 6 and never had an issue. My current Sub is regularly put through its paces and there hasn't been an issue.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. The clasp on the newer models is more substantial, but so it should be- the head is chunkier and it is rather more expensive.
sparkyhx said:
Disco You said:
The anniversary is nicer in every way IMO.
Have to agree the kermit is far nicer than the hulk.having said that I like the green face Milgauss - go figure
Gassing Station | Watches | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


