Old Rolex
Author
Discussion

Chinski

Original Poster:

205 posts

184 months

Wednesday 2nd October 2013
quotequote all
Looking for help!

A friend of work has acquired a old Rolex from a relative .It wasn't working and the face was damaged. I took the watch to another friend who has restored the watch. It looks fantastic now and I would like to buy the watch as he is open to offers.

I wondered if anyone can date the watch and maybe give me a view of the price the watch is worth etc.

Any thought would be appreciated. [url]


Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Wednesday 2nd October 2013
quotequote all
1950s/60s? Can't even tell what it's made if from your shocking photo OP!

I suspect 9ct. I'd say £800-1100 dependant upon condition.

Get yourself on Chrono24 and have a look.

Chinski

Original Poster:

205 posts

184 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
Sorry about thr picture. I will try again. The watch has a SS case.

bry1975

1,246 posts

194 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
Give James Dowling an email he has a UK website.


andyp144

11 posts

173 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
If you have the ser. no. you can get the year of manufacture from the net, just ask the question on google, recently did it for mine.

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
1940s I would guess.

Vipers

33,525 posts

259 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
Take it to a Rolex, they may be able to help you.




smile

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
It could be a Bubbleback, but the simple dial inscription suggests not. Is it a manual wind?

Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
^ not a Bubbleback.

Here's my Big Bubbleback from 1950




Edited by Vvroom on Friday 4th October 20:06

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
Not all Bubblebacks look like that though and thats a larger one. I found a photo which showed a similar case (but the shoulder to case detail differed) with a sub seconds. The dial was marled Perpetual though and I believe Chronometre too.

Its the simple 'Shock Protected' or whatever that makes me wonder, rather than the less usual case style.

Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Not all Bubblebacks look like that though and thats a larger one. I found a photo which showed a similar case (but the shoulder to case detail differed) with a sub seconds. The dial was marled Perpetual though and I believe Chronometre too.

Its the simple 'Shock Protected' or whatever that makes me wonder, rather than the less usual case style.
BBs have oyster cases. OPs is a dress watch and not an oyster case.

I'm happy for someone to tell me I'm wrong, but it's not simply a case of "what's on the dial".


Chinski

Original Poster:

205 posts

184 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
Shock resisting written on the face. The watch has a flat back with some numbers. James advise me that the watch is worth around 450 dollars with a painted face?

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
I might have held a similar view until I started to look into BBs a few weeks ago. Of course, until we have a definitive reference its hard to be sure. I have aseen a square gold ladies with an early automatic movement described as a BB on a collectors site (as an example).

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
Vvroom said:
^ not a Bubbleback.

Here's my Big Bubbleback from 1950


Btw: you have a lady's wrists! hehe

Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
Chinski said:
Shock resisting written on the face. The watch has a flat back with some numbers. James advise me that the watch is worth around 450 dollars with a painted face?
So definitely not a BUbbleBack then.

OP in a stainless steel case, this is worth more than $450. My guess is £800- 1100 for a good example.

Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Vvroom said:
^ not a Bubbleback.

Here's my Big Bubbleback from 1950


Btw: you have a lady's wrists! hehe
I know. They barely touch the sides in Mrs GC8. wink

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
Rather weak.

Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Rather weak.
Self reflection?

Try 'the Lounge' or 'Health Matters'. This is the watch forum.

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
Indeed, so a ish and deliberately offensive remark has no place. I will leave others to draw their own conclusions.

Vvroom

1,170 posts

221 months

Friday 4th October 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Indeed, so a ish and deliberately offensive remark has no place. I will leave others to draw their own conclusions.
scratchchin enjoy your high ground.

Anyway, back on topic....