Position regarding sales tax when buying a used car?
Position regarding sales tax when buying a used car?
Author
Discussion

Pan Pan

Original Poster:

1,116 posts

157 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
When buying used car off the forecourt, is it accepted that the window sticker price includes sales tax, and therefore that the `actual' price of the vehicle is much lower?
Any advice would be appreciated.

LuS1fer

43,547 posts

275 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
Not sure I understand. The window price is the sale price, including any VAT but there may be additions like vehicle excise licence ("road tax").

VeeDub Geezer

461 posts

184 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
Isn't VAT only added if it was charged to the seller when they bought it?


Dr Interceptor

8,183 posts

226 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
There is no VAT on second hand cars, unless it is advertised as 'VAT Qualifying'.

1. Dealer buys car (trade in) from Joe Bloggs for £5000. Joe Bloggs has owned the car from new, he paid VAT on the car when bought new, there is no VAT on this transaction.

2. Dealer puts the car on the forecourt for £6200, and you buy it at that price. You are not charged VAT.

3. Once the dealer is done, dealer retreats to his back office, deducts 5000 from the 6200 you paid, and is left with £1200 profit. This is declared on his VAT return, and so gives away the VATable element to the HMRC, which in this case will be £200 (£1000+VAT = £1200).


Dr Interceptor

8,183 posts

226 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
Just to add to the above, what makes it worse for the dealer is that the costs of getting the car to the forecourt are not factored in.

So in the case above, if the car is bought for £5000, needs alloy wheel repairs (£100), Smart Repairs (£200), a service and MOT (£200) and a warranty (£200), the car has actually cost him £5700. However VAT is still paid on the profitable difference, so if you buy at £6200, that was £200. So all in, the dealer has parted with £5900, and gets to keep his £300 profit.

  • Figures are not accurate, and are just used as an example.

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

219 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
Dr Interceptor said:
Just to add to the above, what makes it worse for the dealer is that the costs of getting the car to the forecourt are not factored in.

So in the case above, if the car is bought for £5000, needs alloy wheel repairs (£100), Smart Repairs (£200), a service and MOT (£200) and a warranty (£200), the car has actually cost him £5700. However VAT is still paid on the profitable difference, so if you buy at £6200, that was £200. So all in, the dealer has parted with £5900, and gets to keep his £300 profit.

  • Figures are not accurate, and are just used as an example.
Blimey, that's a bit harsh. How come it's like that?

Ean218

2,046 posts

280 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
Dr Interceptor said:
So in the case above, if the car is bought for £5000, needs alloy wheel repairs (£100), Smart Repairs (£200), a service and MOT (£200) and a warranty (£200), the car has actually cost him £5700. However VAT is still paid on the profitable difference, so if you buy at £6200, that was £200. So all in, the dealer has parted with £5900, and gets to keep his £300 profit.

  • Figures are not accurate, and are just used as an example.
But doesn't he get to claim back VAT of £16.66 on the wheels, £33.33 on the paint and the VAT on the service?

McWigglebum4th

32,414 posts

234 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
northwest monkey said:
Blimey, that's a bit harsh. How come it's like that?
As he is notworking for the government and must be punished

Dr Interceptor

8,183 posts

226 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
Ean218 said:
Dr Interceptor said:
So in the case above, if the car is bought for £5000, needs alloy wheel repairs (£100), Smart Repairs (£200), a service and MOT (£200) and a warranty (£200), the car has actually cost him £5700. However VAT is still paid on the profitable difference, so if you buy at £6200, that was £200. So all in, the dealer has parted with £5900, and gets to keep his £300 profit.

  • Figures are not accurate, and are just used as an example.
But doesn't he get to claim back VAT of £16.66 on the wheels, £33.33 on the paint and the VAT on the service?
Yes, obviously, he's VAT registered, so he claims back the VAT on anything purchased. I was basing the prices above on NET figures, £100 + VAT for alloy repairs isn't unreasonable at say £20-30 a corner.

singlecoil

35,836 posts

276 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
Dr Interceptor said:
Ean218 said:
Dr Interceptor said:
So in the case above, if the car is bought for £5000, needs alloy wheel repairs (£100), Smart Repairs (£200), a service and MOT (£200) and a warranty (£200), the car has actually cost him £5700. However VAT is still paid on the profitable difference, so if you buy at £6200, that was £200. So all in, the dealer has parted with £5900, and gets to keep his £300 profit.

  • Figures are not accurate, and are just used as an example.
But doesn't he get to claim back VAT of £16.66 on the wheels, £33.33 on the paint and the VAT on the service?
Yes, obviously, he's VAT registered, so he claims back the VAT on anything purchased. I was basing the prices above on NET figures, £100 + VAT for alloy repairs isn't unreasonable at say £20-30 a corner.
Sounds like he needed to buy it for less, or sell it for more.

oldnbold

1,280 posts

176 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
Sounds like he needed to buy it for less, or sell it for more.
Perhaps people should be directed to this thread when the next "dealer insulted me with PX price" thread appears.


biglaugh

Roo

11,504 posts

237 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
The terminology used in the OP would lead you to believe he was in the US but his profile says otherwise.

markmullen

15,877 posts

264 months

Thursday 3rd October 2013
quotequote all
Roo said:
The terminology used in the OP would lead you to believe he was in the US but his profile says otherwise.
Exactly my thoughts.