mk11
Author
Discussion

markmeme

Original Poster:

1 posts

155 months

Thursday 10th October 2013
quotequote all
hi can some one tell me the differance between the mk11 240 and the m11 340 jaguar thanks

SV8Predator

2,102 posts

194 months

Thursday 10th October 2013
quotequote all
markmeme said:
hi can some one tell me the differance between the mk11 240 and the m11 340 jaguar thanks
They are not "Mk II 240", etc, but either the 240 or 340 models.

The 240 has a 2.4 litre engine and the 340 has a 3.4 litre engine. There was no 3.8 litre version as the 420 was in production by then.

There are many detail differences between these models and the previous Mk II.

Roy C

4,213 posts

313 months

ToneyCaroney

1,082 posts

213 months

Thursday 10th October 2013
quotequote all
SV8Predator said:
There was no 3.8 litre version as the 420 was in production by then.
Bit OT but I'm pretty sure there were a handful of 380s built although they were still badged as 340s.

Jagmanv12

1,573 posts

193 months

Thursday 10th October 2013
quotequote all
ToneyCaroney said:
SV8Predator said:
There was no 3.8 litre version as the 420 was in production by then.
Bit OT but I'm pretty sure there were a handful of 380s built although they were still badged as 340s.
Yes there were some 380s built. I thought it was 5 but that wiki link says 12.

jith

2,752 posts

244 months

Friday 11th October 2013
quotequote all
Jagmanv12 said:
ToneyCaroney said:
SV8Predator said:
There was no 3.8 litre version as the 420 was in production by then.
Bit OT but I'm pretty sure there were a handful of 380s built although they were still badged as 340s.
Yes there were some 380s built. I thought it was 5 but that wiki link says 12.
I serviced one for a guy in Glasgow. It was a 3.8 but it was still badged 340 on the boot lid but had a 3.8 badge on the grill. Interestingly it had the straight port head same as the 240 and 340s, and it went like stink.

J