Quality difference, Osnabruck v. Stuttgart built cars
Quality difference, Osnabruck v. Stuttgart built cars
Author
Discussion

PowerMalc

Original Poster:

222 posts

173 months

Wednesday 16th October 2013
quotequote all
The Porsche factory in Osnabruck has been making Boxsters and Caymans for about a year now. Stuttgart continues to make them as well.
Has anyone had any experience of there being quality differences from cars made in two different factory's.
It must be extremely difficult to start producing a product as complicated as a car and to mirror image the production tolerances and quality of a factory that has been making them for years, Stuttgart, and make a copy with the same quality in Osnabruck.
Where the car has been made is identified by the 11th digit of the VIN.
S is for Stuttgart and K is for Osnabruck.
My new Boxster was made in Osnabruck. As this is my first Porsche I have no previous reference. Having said that I do not have any problems with it yet and am very pleased with the build quality.

OggyDJ

533 posts

171 months

Wednesday 16th October 2013
quotequote all
So long as the K is not for "Krappen-Werks" you will be ok smile

Shouldn't worry though, I had a couple of Boxsters made in Uusikaupunki (whatever it was called) and both were fine.

Just because not made in Stuttgart (like all Panameras / Cayennes & now Macan), doesn't mean quality should be any worse....might even be better due to newer line and workers taking more care (initially) during assembly ??

Edited by OggyDJ on Wednesday 16th October 15:53

supersport

4,630 posts

256 months

Wednesday 16th October 2013
quotequote all
If you saw the production line in action you wouldn't question the quality. It wouldn't be possible for the workers to assemble the cars differently or take more care over them. The line is broken down into 4 minutes jobs, each of which is done in the most relaxed way possible, it really is quite a chilled out factory.

One of the most impressive bits being the "marriage" where the complete drive train (except wheels) along with exhaust, suspension the lot meets the body. Quite an impressive four minutes!

nsm3

2,831 posts

225 months

Wednesday 16th October 2013
quotequote all
With the level of automation, pre-assembly of sub components and Corporate identified management/strategies/QA etc, etc, it would be very difficult to put a facility together that didn't result in the same level of build, from one factory to another. The days of brown coated craftsmen, ruefully twiddling pencils as they contemplate the next part of the assembly process are long gone.

Guyr

2,542 posts

311 months

Wednesday 16th October 2013
quotequote all
All the engines are still made at Stuttgart, most of the rest of the stuff is made by outside suppliers.

Both factories pretty much just bolt all these bits together.

minimalist

1,516 posts

234 months

Wednesday 16th October 2013
quotequote all
supersport said:
If you saw the production line in action you wouldn't question the quality. It wouldn't be possible for the workers to assemble the cars differently or take more care over them. The line is broken down into 4 minutes jobs, each of which is done in the most relaxed way possible, it really is quite a chilled out factory.

One of the most impressive bits being the "marriage" where the complete drive train (except wheels) along with exhaust, suspension the lot meets the body. Quite an impressive four minutes!
I had a factory tour in May and agree completely with this. The efficiency is staggering.

GC8

19,910 posts

219 months

Wednesday 16th October 2013
quotequote all
OggyDJ said:
So long as the K is not for "Krappen-Werks" you will be ok smile

Shouldn't worry though, I had a couple of Boxsters made in Uusikaupunki (whatever it was called) and both were fine.

Just because not made in Stuttgart (like all Panameras / Cayennes & now Macan), doesn't mean quality should be any worse....might even be better due to newer line and workers taking more care (initially) during assembly ??

Edited by OggyDJ on Wednesday 16th October 15:53
The Finnish Valmet-built Boxsters were better (according to Porsche)!

SunDiver

780 posts

266 months

Thursday 17th October 2013
quotequote all
"It must be extremely difficult to start producing a product as complicated as a car and to mirror image the production tolerances and quality of a factory that has been making them for years, Stuttgart, and make a copy with the same quality in Osnabruck."

Agreed, but I bet sometimes being the new site has advantages. All new fit out etc. I bet the Stuttgart guys were asking why the Onsabruck noobs were getting all the spanky new kit.

hotpowner

158 posts

199 months

Thursday 17th October 2013
quotequote all
I thought Cayennes were built in Leipzig?

The production I was told was installed / built by Toyota

Callughan

6,313 posts

221 months

Thursday 17th October 2013
quotequote all
hotpowner said:
I thought Cayennes were built in Leipzig?

The production I was told was installed / built by Toyota
Didn't Toyota just introduce 'Just In Time' method?

OggyDJ

533 posts

171 months

Thursday 17th October 2013
quotequote all
hotpowner said:
I thought Cayennes were built in Leipzig?

The production I was told was installed / built by Toyota
Yes of course, this is what I was referring to (also not made in Stuttgart).

Some great videos on U-Tube (Mega factories) re Liepzig production.

supersport

4,630 posts

256 months

Thursday 17th October 2013
quotequote all
Oddly though all the engines are built in Stuttgart and then shipped out to the other factories.