No, the Beatles weren't rubbish
No, the Beatles weren't rubbish
Author
Discussion

audidoody

Original Poster:

8,598 posts

285 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Just been listening to CD's 1 and 2 of Bol 2 of The Beatles at the BBC. Recorded live and mostly straight to air. Not a bum note or rough vocal to be heard. Exquisite harmonies, swoopingl Macca bass, Ringo's perfect beat, George's versatile solo'ing, John's rhythm playing. And all to the most perfectly-constructed pop songs years before the REALLY ground-breaking stuff

Christ they were good in their day.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

178 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
audidoody said:
Just been listening to CD's 1 and 2 of Bol 2 of The Beatles at the BBC. Recorded live and mostly straight to air. Not a bum note or rough vocal to be heard. Exquisite harmonies, swoopingl Macca bass, Ringo's perfect beat, George's versatile solo'ing, John's rhythm playing. And all to the most perfectly-constructed pop songs years before the REALLY ground-breaking stuff

Christ they were good in their day.
I was with you until that point.

Asterix

24,438 posts

257 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Interviewer - "Is Ringo the best drummer in the world?"

Lennon - "Eh? He's not even the best drummer in The Beatles!"

hehe

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

178 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
George Harrison was no great shakes as a musician either. Him & Ringo would have been entirely interchangeable with no detriment to their legacy. Unless you're a really, really big fan of here comes the sun.

Edited by Justin Cyder on Monday 18th November 11:18

Halmyre

12,560 posts

168 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
George Harrison was no great shakes as a musician either. Him & Ringo would have been entirely interchangeable with no detriment to their legacy. Unless you're a really, really big fan of here comes the sun.

Edited by Justin Cyder on Monday 18th November 11:18
Were any of them particularly proficient on their chosen instruments? People rarely put any of the Fab Four in the "10 Greatest Guitarist/Bassist/Drummer" lists. But that's fine by me.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

178 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Fair point. What they did have was a song writing core streets ahead of their peers.

singlecoil

35,825 posts

275 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
George Harrison was no great shakes as a musician either. Him & Ringo would have been entirely interchangeable with no detriment to their legacy. Unless you're a really, really big fan of here comes the sun.

Edited by Justin Cyder on Monday 18th November 11:18
He managed quite a few other songs, for instance "If I Needed Someone" is the outstanding track on Rubber Soul, and "Something" has done quite well too.

ratbane

1,395 posts

245 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Not the old Ringo bashing club again eh?

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Asterix said:
Interviewer - "Is Ringo the best drummer in the world?"

Lennon - "Eh? He's not even the best drummer in The Beatles!"

hehe
Not necessarily aimed at you, but why do some people take what was obviously a joke by Lennon as some kind of condemnation of Ringo's ability. It was just a typical throw away comment.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

178 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Without merit you think?

singlecoil

35,825 posts

275 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Bluequay said:
Asterix said:
Interviewer - "Is Ringo the best drummer in the world?"

Lennon - "Eh? He's not even the best drummer in The Beatles!"

hehe
Not necessarily aimed at you, but why do some people take what was obviously a joke by Lennon as some kind of condemnation of Ringo's ability. It was just a typical throw away comment.
Indeed. Lennon wrote a lot of very good songs, and talked a lot of st. Same as a certain singer in a well known Irish band.

selym

9,581 posts

200 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Its lucky we are all musicians and songwriters of high regard as well as powerfully built company directors to be able to cast such aspersions.

But then again, that's what PH is all about isn't it?

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
Without merit you think?
Yes, In my opinion he's a decent drummer and more importantly he was part of the dynamic that enabled them to make the music they did, even if he wasn't as talented as Lennon or McCartney.

singlecoil

35,825 posts

275 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
This something else Lennon said about Ringo

"Ringo was a star in his own right in Liverpool before we even met. Ringo was a professional drummer who sang and performed and was in one of the top groups in Britain, but especially in Liverpool. So Ringo's talent would have come out one way or the other ... whatever that spark is in Ringo, we all know it but can't put our finger on it. Whether it's acting, drumming, or singing, I don't know. There's something in him that is projectable and he would have surfaced as an individual ... Ringo is a damn good drummer"

Phil Collins rates him too. As does Jim Keltner.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

178 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
selym said:
Its lucky we are all musicians and songwriters of high regard as well as powerfully built company directors to be able to cast such aspersions.

But then again, that's what PH is all about isn't it?
And how long exactly have you been a premier league manager?

Opinions are permitted, it's how it works.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

178 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
This something else Lennon said about Ringo

"Ringo was a star in his own right in Liverpool before we even met. Ringo was a professional drummer who sang and performed and was in one of the top groups in Britain, but especially in Liverpool. So Ringo's talent would have come out one way or the other ... whatever that spark is in Ringo, we all know it but can't put our finger on it. Whether it's acting, drumming, or singing, I don't know. There's something in him that is projectable and he would have surfaced as an individual ... Ringo is a damn good drummer"

Phil Collins rates him too. As does Jim Keltner.
George Martin however was more equivocal:

George Martin said:
Ringo hit good and hard and used the tom-tom well, even though he couldn't do a roll to save his life

ratbane

1,395 posts

245 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
It’s often difficult explaining this, particularly to non-drummers, who often think a drummers “greatness” is based upon his ability to drum as fast as he can at all opportunities.

There is nothing particularly impressive about Ringos’ drumming except for maybe a few things.

1. His parts, whilst mostly being simple, work perfectly in the context of the songs,
2. His drums always sounded great and their sounds vary in different songs. He played a small kit, and as such was always playing with a sense of “economy”.
3. If you listen to The Beatles whole catalog it’s all there, odd signatures, tricky rudiments, inventiveness, all kinds of stuff. Unlike some drummers, he obviously felt he didn’t need to use them all the time, and out of context. If something seems flashy then it probably isn’t right in the context of the song.

Ringo drummed economically, and in most circumstances made the song a better one for it. That is the sign of a truly great drummer.

He was the drummer in The Beatles, not Chick Coreas band, or The Mahavishnu Orchestra. Can you imagine how crap The Beatles would have been with Dave Weckl or Billy Cobham on the tubs?

Ringo WAS the best drummer in The Beatles, and changed modern rock drumming by bringing matched grip to the fore. As a consequence, he is one of the most important drummers in musical history. It’s as simple as that.

singlecoil

35,825 posts

275 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
singlecoil said:
This something else Lennon said about Ringo

"Ringo was a star in his own right in Liverpool before we even met. Ringo was a professional drummer who sang and performed and was in one of the top groups in Britain, but especially in Liverpool. So Ringo's talent would have come out one way or the other ... whatever that spark is in Ringo, we all know it but can't put our finger on it. Whether it's acting, drumming, or singing, I don't know. There's something in him that is projectable and he would have surfaced as an individual ... Ringo is a damn good drummer"

Phil Collins rates him too. As does Jim Keltner.
George Martin however was more equivocal:

George Martin said:
Ringo hit good and hard and used the tom-tom well, even though he couldn't do a roll to save his life
So what? Have you heard his drumming on 'Rain'? It's outstanding.

Not that music is a competition in any case. There's plenty of drummers who are technically better than Ringo, but that really doesn't matter. He played what was needed when it was needed.

nail_it

968 posts

237 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
Justin Cyder said:
George Harrison was no great shakes as a musician either. Him & Ringo would have been entirely interchangeable with no detriment to their legacy. Unless you're a really, really big fan of here comes the sun.

Edited by Justin Cyder on Monday 18th November 11:18
He managed quite a few other songs, for instance "If I Needed Someone" is the outstanding track on Rubber Soul, and "Something" has done quite well too.
And with the Traveling Wilburys

ratbane

1,395 posts

245 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Try Strawberry Fields Forever too. Absolutely perfect drumming, or Come Together, such great feel for the song. GM also stated that Ringo had a "super steady beat, and a great sound".


…and a lesson in studio work…..


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tA_CTCYr4IE



Edited by ratbane on Monday 18th November 17:11