More monitoring ...
Author
Discussion

speedking31

Original Poster:

3,943 posts

166 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
BBC
No mention of what parameters will be assessed from the collected data. Hopefully exceeding the speed limit will be shown not to correlate to claims and so automatic penalties can be done away with.

Tailgating, jumping reds, poor maintenance etc. will not be detected, would be interesting to know if they indirectly affect claims.

Cotty

42,248 posts

314 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
Isn't this just like Drive Like a Girl http://drivelikeagirl.com/ with a black box in the car.

I have a black box in my car its a "drive it like you stole it" box

Terminator X

20,779 posts

234 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
"This, he says, is the future of car insurance: being able to monitor individual drivers to give them lower prices but also to make them better drivers."

If that's the future, I'm oot getmecoat

TX.

veevee

1,458 posts

181 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
BBC said:
Better big data technologies, like the telematic driving data collected by car companies or even information gathered from social media profiles, can help augment that risk profile.
Wow.

SrMoreno

546 posts

176 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
article said:
This is because traditional insurance looks at averages, as opposed to specifics. You fill out a form saying you're a certain age, and drive a certain type of car, and are a specific gender - and that's basically all the data car companies have to assess your riskiness as driver.
I thought they were no longer allowed to use gender for calculating premiums?

Cotty

42,248 posts

314 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
SrMoreno said:
I thought they were no longer allowed to use gender for calculating premiums?
Thats correct.

maffski

1,905 posts

189 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
SrMoreno said:
I thought they were no longer allowed to use gender for calculating premiums?
The article is about US insurers

scarble

5,277 posts

187 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
Cotty said:
SrMoreno said:
I thought they were no longer allowed to use gender for calculating premiums?
Thats correct.
Yet people who don't know this are busily shaping public opinion on the matter.

Maybe if people who actually crash and are found to be at fault actually had their premiums increased accordingly the rest of us who maybe admittedly drive a little enthusiastically but don't crash could be priced fairly?
Or.. you know, if the whole industry wasn't one big scam..

singlecoil

35,834 posts

276 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
I think I would be OK with having my driving monitored if it meant lower premiums, which, bearing in mind how competitive the industry is, it would.

krallicious

4,312 posts

235 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
I think I would be OK with having my driving monitored if it meant lower premiums, which, bearing in mind how competitive the industry is, it would.
Conversely, I would rather pay a bit more and not be monitored.

singlecoil

35,834 posts

276 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2013
quotequote all
krallicious said:
singlecoil said:
I think I would be OK with having my driving monitored if it meant lower premiums, which, bearing in mind how competitive the industry is, it would.
Conversely, I would rather pay a bit more and not be monitored.
I think that's how it works.


I can well understand people not wanting this, and at one time I wouldn't have either.