Birth year watches...anyone own one?
Birth year watches...anyone own one?
Author
Discussion

jkb89

Original Poster:

65 posts

165 months

Friday 6th December 2013
quotequote all
Thinking about saving up for an early birthyear Sea-dweller, just wondering if many people have thought the same? Seem to be rare as hens teeth though!

PJ S

10,842 posts

258 months

Friday 6th December 2013
quotequote all
Why?
What is significant about a watch made the same year you arrived on the scene?
Unless it's a Ltd Edn or Anniversary model that year, it's no different to the one they made the year before and the following years, of the exact same model!

Sorry it's not the reply you were looking for, but I do have to question the logic being employed in these types of threads, since all I can come up with is, "Does Not Compute. Danger Will Robinson, Danger!"

tonytifoso

1,385 posts

254 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
I have a sundial, I think? wink

Jonnas

1,004 posts

194 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
It's my birthday at the end of the month (the big 4-0) and I thought I'd treat myself to a birth year Omega. After quite a while looking I've found the one I want on EBay, the auction is up Monday!

Furberger

719 posts

230 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Thanks for your contribution PJS. I like the idea of this and have had a look in the past but not committed. Might do now!

tomw2000

2,508 posts

226 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
PJ S said:
Why?
Last year was my 40th (oct). My wife bought me a 1972 IV red sub.

I'm not complaining.

Why not? wink

marcosgt

11,506 posts

207 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
tomw2000 said:
Last year was my 40th (oct). My wife bought me a 1972 IV red sub.

I'm not complaining.

Why not? wink
Exactly, why not?

Like a lot of others I liked the idea of a watch that's been around as long as me.

I've got a fairly cheap Seamaster 30.

M

SkepticSteve

3,598 posts

225 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
I was after an Omega Pie-pan in 18ct gold, but in the end I went for a very nice (bargain) refurbished Bulova!
I like that it is a bit, left-field.

L7 for me, still working (like me), still accurate (like me), still good looking (errr??).
Technically I suppose I should have got one MADE in L6! smile

Thing to remember that 50's, 60's and many 70's watches were quite small, "Boys Size" ofeten quoted.
Next to my PO, it looks tiny, so if you find and "Over size" one snap it up!







DKL

4,996 posts

253 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Not quite a red sub but I waited for a 3 mill series blue faced datejust which puts it about a month after I was born. Its a bit baggy but Duncan at Genesis has serviced it and it keeps good time.
I shan't sell it ever as it feels just that little bit more special to me.

yeti

10,704 posts

306 months

Sunday 8th December 2013
quotequote all
No rationality to it I agree, but it is a nice thing... To know that your watch is the same age as you is a point of interest. Most things we find interesting about watches are irrational, this is just another smile

Don't have one yet, if a '74 1680 or 1665 came up thought at a decent price I'd be very tempted. A true keeper that way and Subs/SDs will look good forever.

Podie

46,649 posts

306 months

Sunday 8th December 2013
quotequote all
It's an excuse to buy another watch! biggrin


blueg33

46,920 posts

255 months

Sunday 8th December 2013
quotequote all
Mine is a 1965 Omega Seamaster Auto in stairless with silver hands and silver dagger markers

Tanguero

4,535 posts

232 months

Sunday 8th December 2013
quotequote all
PJ S said:
Why?
What is significant about a watch made the same year you arrived on the scene?
Unless it's a Ltd Edn or Anniversary model that year, it's no different to the one they made the year before and the following years, of the exact same model!

Sorry it's not the reply you were looking for, but I do have to question the logic being employed in these types of threads, since all I can come up with is, "Does Not Compute. Danger Will Robinson, Danger!"
Yes - and in the same vein you may as well use a £1.99 quartz watch from a garage - it will be more accurate than any mechanical movement. You can buy it while you are filling the ecobox car that is only intended to get you from A to B...

The significance is the fact that it is the same age, that it did arrive on the scene at the same time as you. It's an aesthetic and intangible benefit. Fine if that doesn't mean anything to you, but please don't ridicule those to whom it does have significance.

andy tims

5,606 posts

277 months

Sunday 8th December 2013
quotequote all
Nearest I ever got was a 1963 SM300 - 1965 is my birth year.
I buy watches based on what I like, then condition and price, but if the opportunity arose I would certainly get one, but it wouldn't automatically get keeper status.

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Sunday 8th December 2013
quotequote all
Tanguero said:
PJ S said:
Why?
What is significant about a watch made the same year you arrived on the scene?
Unless it's a Ltd Edn or Anniversary model that year, it's no different to the one they made the year before and the following years, of the exact same model!

Sorry it's not the reply you were looking for, but I do have to question the logic being employed in these types of threads, since all I can come up with is, "Does Not Compute. Danger Will Robinson, Danger!"
Yes - and in the same vein you may as well use a £1.99 quartz watch from a garage - it will be more accurate than any mechanical movement. You can buy it while you are filling the ecobox car that is only intended to get you from A to B...

The significance is the fact that it is the same age, that it did arrive on the scene at the same time as you. It's an aesthetic and intangible benefit. Fine if that doesn't mean anything to you, but please don't ridicule those to whom it does have significance.
I think that he has something. The 'birth year' watch thing started as a way to justify and grandify the purchase of what would otherwise be a lesser/cheaper watch from a better manufacturer.

Without this you had simply bought a £500 Rolex rather than a current model for £1,500.

Since then it has developed and become a thing, but its origin remains.

Edited by GC8 on Monday 9th December 01:48

SkepticSteve

3,598 posts

225 months

Sunday 8th December 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
I think that he has something. The 'birth year' watch thing started as a way to justify and grandify the purchase of what would otherwise be a lesser/cheaper watch from a better manufacturer.

Without this you had simply bought a £500 Rolex rather than a current model for £1,500.

Since then it has developed and become a thing, but its origin remains.
There could be something in that, but equally I could have spent many thousands on one as well.

When I got one for my oldest Brother, it was "Exactly" what he had always wanted.
A Vintage watch manually wound watch. He got me into watches!!
The correct shape and size, being rectangular, to suit his favoured style.

But as you have said, it was well within the cost I had to spend.

Buying an American Brand with a swiss movement (Elgin) is a bargain way to show that you have taken that bit extra thought and effort in getting this special gift and he really treasures it as a special gift from his youngest Brother.

After all I could have sent him a MoonPig card instead? For his 60th Birthday??


Quinny

15,943 posts

297 months

Sunday 8th December 2013
quotequote all
All of my watches are birth yearyes......... Not my birth year, but must be someone's out there...smile

Miguel Alvarez

5,191 posts

201 months

Monday 9th December 2013
quotequote all
I'm looking at one at the moment. The thing pushing me to purchase is that it is cheaper than later models.

marcosgt

11,506 posts

207 months

Monday 9th December 2013
quotequote all
SkepticSteve said:
There could be something in that, but equally I could have spent many thousands on one as well.
I don't see anything in that at all...

I didn't buy my (non-birth year) Breitling Cosmonaute because it was cheaper than the current version. I bought it because I much preferred it!

I bought the Omega Seamaster 30 because it was a nice watch from the year I was born. I didn't want a current Seamaster (It's not my favourite Diver) and I already had a dearer Omega.

M

Podie

46,649 posts

306 months

Monday 9th December 2013
quotequote all
andy tims said:
I buy watches based on what I like, then condition and price, but if the opportunity arose I would certainly get one, but it wouldn't automatically get keeper status.
Likewise - I buy what appeals to me.

Happily for me, I wanted a Heuer Daytona and it happens to have been produced when I was born, so I held out for a specific year.