Carbon Fibre Helmets
Author
Discussion

woof

Original Poster:

8,456 posts

299 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all

I need to look at getting a new lid for next year.
Always used Bell and was looking at their new Carbon Fibre helmets for 2014 they have coming out.

I don't need one for the current level of competition I'm in but the are a little bit lighter and have better protection (?)

Any comments vs the standard and benefits.
Obvious cost difference is pretty big.

http://www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/motorsport/helmets/b...
vs
http://www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/motorsport/helmets/b...

majordad

3,629 posts

219 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
IMHO the only advantage of the carbon one over the non carbon is less weight, which might be a factor in longer races. Like the OP I've always used Bell helmets as I like the brand and design. Both these helmets are to the current Snell/FIA Standard so I would assume that there is no difference in their crash protection performance.

tristancliffe

357 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
Not quite.

The helmets all PASS that Snell standard, but what we don't know is how easily they pass. It might be that the cheap helmet passes acceptably, and the carbon one is totally unmarked by the test.

Test standards like this mean that we only know if they aren't st, but it doesn't tell us which is better beyond that. At that applies in all walks of life, not just helmet testing.

SimonMason

31 posts

159 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
Its all relative. Carbon is best because its lightest, if money is no object then its a no brainer not because its needed but because it has no future limits to what you could do in motorsport.

However! The fact is, the likes of Arai and Bell, above entry level helmets, don't make adequate lids for modern motor sport, they make excellent ones.

Personally, i'd rather buy top end NON carbon Bell or Arai and spend the difference on an extra suit, a set of tyres or maybe a diamond ring to keep the wife on side! Again its all relative wink

woof

Original Poster:

8,456 posts

299 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
I think you're right - money no object, then you might as well buy the carbon - but you can get 3 lids for the price of a carbon one. Nice to have a clean dry lid to put on for that second race of the day wink

I'll wait to the Autosport show to try them on and make a choice then

Edited by woof on Tuesday 17th December 15:52

majordad

3,629 posts

219 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
My reading of Snell Testing is that it's either pass or fail. I dont think they have tests that go further,
I 'd like to think someone does but a standard is just that, a mark to be achieved. You're right in what you say re reputatable manufacturers, they do test their helmets further than lesser ones and further than the basic standard.

indigorallye

555 posts

247 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
Devil's advocate:
If figures/ results are not published, and if it is just a pass or fail test, then how do we know that Bell and Arai are superior to HedTec, Impact etc.
Are there any independent test results out there??

Mr_Thyroid

1,995 posts

249 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
The lighter the lid, the less chance of neck injury in a crash.

woof

Original Poster:

8,456 posts

299 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
Mr_Thyroid said:
The lighter the lid, the less chance of neck injury in a crash.
Does it matter when yr wearing a Hans ?

Peter Davies

58 posts

230 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
Mr Mason,

One diamond ring a year is enough wink

Peter

Mr_Thyroid

1,995 posts

249 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
woof said:
Mr_Thyroid said:
The lighter the lid, the less chance of neck injury in a crash.
Does it matter when yr wearing a Hans ?
Dunno. How much does a hans protect in a lateral impact? Does a hans completely eliminate the chance of all whiplash type injuries?

woof

Original Poster:

8,456 posts

299 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
We'll I don't think they can say it 100% protects you but it reduces the likelihood of head and/or neck injuries - so therefore I guess, a lighter helmet would only reduce the chance further.


majordad

3,629 posts

219 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
I dont think HANS is designed for side impacts ?

woof

Original Poster:

8,456 posts

299 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
majordad said:
I dont think HANS is designed for side impacts ?
It's not - it mostly provides support for front impacts. That's why a lot of sportscars have those high sided seats and additional netting.

Hollowpockets

5,909 posts

238 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
I bought a Bell carbon HP7 and a hans sport 2 device, really pleased with them both!


Oilchange

9,530 posts

282 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
It was designed to protect against Basal (basilar) Skull fracture, an often fatal injury from frontal impacts causing the head to fly forward suddenly, fatalities from it include:

Formula 1 drivers Roland Ratzenberger[3] and Ayrton Senna in the 1994 San Marino Formula One Grand Prix
Indy 500 drivers Scott Brayton, Bill Vukovich and Tony Bettenhausen
NASCAR drivers Adam Petty, Tony Roper, Kenny Irwin, Jr., Terry Schoonover, Grant Adcox, Neil Bonnett, John Nemechek, Dale Earnhardt, J. D. McDuffie and Clifford Allison
ARCA driver Blaise Alexander
CART drivers Jovy Marcelo and Gonzalo Rodriguez


Edited by Oilchange on Wednesday 18th December 15:18

Graham

16,378 posts

306 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Oilchange said:
It was designed to protect against Basal (basilar) Skull fracture, an often fatal injury from frontal impacts causing the head to fly forward suddenly, fatalities from it include:

Formula 1 drivers Roland Ratzenberger[3] and Ayrton Senna in the 1994 San Marino Formula One Grand Prix
Indy 500 drivers Scott Brayton, Bill Vukovich and Tony Bettenhausen
NASCAR drivers Adam Petty, Tony Roper, Kenny Irwin, Jr., Terry Schoonover, Grant Adcox, Neil Bonnett, John Nemechek, Dale Earnhardt, J. D. McDuffie and Clifford Allison
ARCA driver Blaise Alexander
CART drivers Jovy Marcelo and Gonzalo Rodriguez


Edited by Oilchange on Wednesday 18th December 15:18
wasnt Senna a wishbone/wheel impact to the head?

woof

Original Poster:

8,456 posts

299 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
There were 3 injuries that all could have been fatal if only each had happened.
The blunt head trauma - a hans would have saved him in that instance alone
The front wheel came into the cockpit and struck Senna's head and also a piece of suspension pierced his visor and entered his skull.

It was an horrific series of injuries and really no doubt that he was killed instantly, although he heart was re started he had suffered multiple fatal brain injuries.



Phil Dicky

7,193 posts

285 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Graham said:
Oilchange said:
It was designed to protect against Basal (basilar) Skull fracture, an often fatal injury from frontal impacts causing the head to fly forward suddenly, fatalities from it include:

Formula 1 drivers Roland Ratzenberger[3] and Ayrton Senna in the 1994 San Marino Formula One Grand Prix
Indy 500 drivers Scott Brayton, Bill Vukovich and Tony Bettenhausen
NASCAR drivers Adam Petty, Tony Roper, Kenny Irwin, Jr., Terry Schoonover, Grant Adcox, Neil Bonnett, John Nemechek, Dale Earnhardt, J. D. McDuffie and Clifford Allison
ARCA driver Blaise Alexander
CART drivers Jovy Marcelo and Gonzalo Rodriguez


Edited by Oilchange on Wednesday 18th December 15:18
wasnt Senna a wishbone/wheel impact to the head?
Yes I'm sure it was from memory.

Oilchange

9,530 posts

282 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Just quoted from Wiki as I couldn't be bothered to type it all out so they may have got it wrong

Phil Dicky said:
Yes I'm sure it was from memory.
Edited to add another quote from Wiki:

The autopsy showed that the crash caused multiple fractures at the base of the cranium, crushing the forehead and rupturing the temporal artery with haemorrhage in the respiratory passages. It is possible to resuscitate a dead person immediately after the heart stops through cardio-respiratory processes. The procedure is known as putting the patient on the machine. From the medical-legal viewpoint, in Ayrton's case, there is a subtle point: resuscitation measures were implemented.
What appeared to have happened was that the right front wheel shot up upon impact and entered the cockpit, striking the right frontal area of his helmet. The violence of the wheel's impact pushed his head back against the headrest, causing fatal skull fractures.[6] A piece of suspension attached to the wheel had partially penetrated his Bell M3 helmet and caused trauma to his head.[6] In addition, it appeared that a jagged piece of the upright assembly had penetrated the helmet visor just above his right eye.[6] Senna was using a medium sized (58 cm) M3 helmet with a new "thin" Bell visor. Any one of the three injuries would probably have killed him



beaten to it by woof


Edited by Oilchange on Wednesday 18th December 16:51