untapped statistics..........
untapped statistics..........
Author
Discussion

bryan35

Original Poster:

1,906 posts

265 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
We constantly here statistics about accidents down at camera sits (regression to the mean ignored), 1/3 of accidents caused by speeding etc etc etc.
Instead of arguing these statistics, are there any statistics that argue the other way.
for instance, how much electricity do these cameras use/waste?, how much film (that's made from animals remember ) do they use? how much of a 'carbuncle' are they in the country. How much do speed humps effect bicycles, horses etc?, how much paper is used/wasted posting out NIP's (3 million of them was it? or was it 2 million - don't know) and how many trees are cut down for the purpose.

you see the direction I'm coming from?

bryan35

Original Poster:

1,906 posts

265 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
i'll have a go. A gatso has a radar device, a camera (mechanical so prob litle quiescence) and that's about it I think. A couple of hundred watts perhaps. They also work in all sorts of temperatures, so there's probably a small frost stat heater in there as well Say 250w all in al. So, if there's 5000 of the things, they are using about 1.25 megawatts of power. A kilo of coal gives you about (I think) 17kWh heat, 30% of which turns into electricity at a power station (ish). These are all guesstimates. So, 30 megawatt hours of electric a day, that's about 11 gigawatt hours a year, using 2.2 million kilos of coal, or 2200 tonnes. That sound awfully wastfull when you look at it like that.
miles driven (in vans (like cars but bigger)) to empty the film. erm........anyone got any figures?
NIP's, they are A4 in size (or mine was) 21.0cm x 29.7cm = 0.062 square meters. x 3 million = 186000 square meters. 3 times that if you include the envelope = 558000 square meters. minimum football pitch is 4050 square meters (90x45) so that's 138 football pitches.

safespeed

2,983 posts

298 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
bryan35 said:
We constantly here statistics about accidents down at camera sits (regression to the mean ignored), 1/3 of accidents caused by speeding etc etc etc.
Instead of arguing these statistics, are there any statistics that argue the other way.


The only stats that really count against needless loss of life are needless loss of life stats. I'm doing it.

bryan35

Original Poster:

1,906 posts

265 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
well, can't fault you paul.

Funny getting a reply on here when I've come into contact with you a couple of times before, but in different circumstances.

hmm........that's got you thinking eh?

8Pack

5,182 posts

264 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
Hi Bryan, I would say, If 1/3 of all accidents are caused by speeding drivers, then get all the slow, dawdling drivers off the Bl...y road! We could improve the accident figures by 66%! ....Er sorry Bryan, couldn't resist!...........

>> Edited by 8Pack on Thursday 11th November 02:08

bryan35

Original Poster:

1,906 posts

265 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
you should be on stage! :-)

hope I haven't freaked you paul, the organisation I work for come into contact with all sorts of people, yourself included. Earlier this year infact if I'm not mistaken!

8Pack

5,182 posts

264 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
[quote=bryan35]you should be on stage!

Hi Bryan, Just making my point of course about how much we have to view statistics with sceptisism, as I'm sure that you and Paul are both aware. Please don't regard my intervention as critical to your posts in any way. It was just too good to resist 8Pack

safespeed

2,983 posts

298 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
bryan35 said:
hope I haven't freaked you paul, the organisation I work for come into contact with all sorts of people, yourself included. Earlier this year infact if I'm not mistaken!


Freaked? Me? Nah, I don't think so.

So who do you work for? Email me if you like.

8Pack

5,182 posts

264 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
Incidently Paul, whilst you're watching this post,(sorry to digress Bryan).

Kathy Keeler from BRAKE was on GMR this week with Alan Beswick. Saying that Drink driving had increased by 1/3 in 10 yrs amongst young drivers, and called for MORE TRAFFIC POLICE! Does she realise what is happening? This from someone who defends speed cameras? Sorry Guys, back to you!

>> Edited by 8Pack on Thursday 11th November 02:50

safespeed

2,983 posts

298 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
8Pack said:

Kathy Keeler from BRAKE was on GMR this week with Alan Beswick. Saying that Drink driving had increased by 1/3 in 10 yrs amongst young drivers, and called for MORE TRAFFIC POLICE! Does she realise what is happening? This from someone who defends speed cameras?


Most everyone in road safety is calling for more traffic police now. They will need to be proper trafpol, however. None of this three week course rubbish.

8Pack

5,182 posts

264 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
Hi Paul, Sorry once again, I really don't want to pinch Bryans post.

Realising that the number of speed cameras is indirectly proportional to the number of trafpol. I wonder why she doesn't? Does she not connect the two?

Jus' wanted to let you know what she said Paul in case you should cross swords.

Again sorry Bryan, please continue.

lunarscope

2,901 posts

266 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
Perhaps we could remove the camera boxes and have TrafPol sitting perched on the posts that remain.
This means that the person who currently replaces the film can be used to deliver food to the TrafPol and replace their colostomy bags.
Everyone's a winner !

safespeed

2,983 posts

298 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
lunarscope said:
Perhaps we could remove the camera boxes and have TrafPol sitting perched on the posts that remain.
This means that the person who currently replaces the film can be used to deliver food to the TrafPol and replace their colostomy bags.
Everyone's a winner !


And now I'm picturing a copper on a ten foot pole in high vis clothing pulling out his pocketbook and licking his pencil in yet another vain attempt to draw an accurate picture of a speeding car before it passes out of sight...

Thanks for the image...

stackmonkey

5,083 posts

273 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
safespeed said:

lunarscope said:
Perhaps we could remove the camera boxes and have TrafPol sitting perched on the posts that remain.
This means that the person who currently replaces the film can be used to deliver food to the TrafPol and replace their colostomy bags.
Everyone's a winner !



And now I'm picturing a copper sitting on a ten foot pole licking his pencil before it passes out of sight...

Thanks for the image...





sorry, couldn't resist

lunarscope

2,901 posts

266 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
Anyone any good with Photoshop/PSP ?

safespeed

2,983 posts

298 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
lunarscope said:
Anyone any good with Photoshop/PSP ?


I know an excellent cartoonist. I'll commission it. Standby.

Pigeon

18,535 posts

270 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
safespeed said:

lunarscope said:
Perhaps we could remove the camera boxes and have TrafPol sitting perched on the posts that remain.
This means that the person who currently replaces the film can be used to deliver food to the TrafPol and replace their colostomy bags.
Everyone's a winner !

And now I'm picturing a copper on a ten foot pole in high vis clothing pulling out his pocketbook and licking his pencil in yet another vain attempt to draw an accurate picture of a speeding car before it passes out of sight...

Thanks for the image...

Have you read "The Fifth Elephant" by Terry Pratchett? There's a wonderful description of an "alternative" speed camera technology...

Pigeon

18,535 posts

270 months

Thursday 11th November 2004
quotequote all
safespeed said:

lunarscope said:
Perhaps we could remove the camera boxes and have TrafPol sitting perched on the posts that remain.
This means that the person who currently replaces the film can be used to deliver food to the TrafPol and replace their colostomy bags.
Everyone's a winner !

And now I'm picturing a copper on a ten foot pole in high vis clothing pulling out his pocketbook and licking his pencil in yet another vain attempt to draw an accurate picture of a speeding car before it passes out of sight...

Thanks for the image...

Have you read "The Fifth Elephant" by Terry Pratchett? There's a wonderful description of an "alternative" speed camera technology...

safespeed

2,983 posts

298 months

Friday 12th November 2004
quotequote all
safespeed said:
I know an excellent cartoonist. I'll commission it. Standby.


Here it is:



The artist is Tim Harries:
www.timharries.co.uk

Now we have to do a little work on the caption...

Over to you Guys...

Mr E

22,718 posts

283 months

Friday 12th November 2004
quotequote all
good one mate - like it.....

"Government accused of dumbing down road safety?"