Reducing Det???
Author
Discussion

Luther Blisset

Original Poster:

402 posts

162 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Probably not the right forum for this, but the Engines forum doesn't receive much in the way of traffic...

Just wondering how to make an engine more det prone, and if what the gains could be?

Looking to build a Peugeot XU10 twin cam hybrid (mix of XU10J4/R/R and XUJ4 with a turbo, and with good squish (0.9mm) I'm looking at ~9.3:1 compression.

Ideally I's like to run it on BP 95, and from what I gather a ceramic coated twin scroll manifold and decent-ish cam profiles (I'm limited to stock pug profiles )will help.

Obviously Nimonic exhaust valves help, (is 100+ plus readily available?) as do trojan valve seats and guides, polished combustion chambers, and oil sprayed pistons ( the more the better).

How about extra water lines in the head to cool it down?

Any turbo recommendations up to 400hp+ (twin scroll preferred)? and any other trips and ticks to allow me to run more boost?

I was thinking of the Borg Warner S200 range or the Mitsubishi twin scrolls?

Any advance on this? Also, what ECU and supporting mods for the safest, most reliable most durable 400hp available? Not interested in a pissing contest TBH

Will a stock XU10J4RS block and rods suffice?

Also, I was wondering if there is an ideal ignition angle for engines in general, and if it's possibly related to bottom end geometry. Most OEMs "seem" to vary comp and boost instead - giving the impression there's some magic optimal ignition figure I don't know about yet!


Edited by Luther Blisset on Sunday 22 December 21:09

shovelheadrob

1,564 posts

201 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Ahh detonation, not an illiterate with financial problems after all.

anonymous-user

84 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Luther Blisset said:
Just wondering how to make an engine more det prone,
er, i think you mean "less" not "more"..........

Phateuk

1,004 posts

167 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
shovelheadrob said:
Ahh detonation, not an illiterate with financial problems after all.
Thought the same rofl

littleredrooster

6,399 posts

226 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Luther Blisset said:
Just wondering how to make an engine more det prone, and if what the gains could be?
If I'm reading this right...why on earth would you want to build an engine which was more prone to detonation? Are you sure you read this sentence before you posted it?

anonymous-user

84 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Any forced induction is going to be knock limited on pump fuel so the best you can do is drop the static compression ratio like you suggest, reduce intake temperature by fitting a big intercooler and running the best fuel you can, preferably 98Ron or E85 equivalent. Water or meth injection will also help keep detonation under control but ultimately the safety margin is dictated by how good your tune is. Detonation is bad.

Luther Blisset

Original Poster:

402 posts

162 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Phateuk said:
Thought the same rofl
TBH I have no idea what you're referring to laugh My mistake for the misleading content, hope the title gave the game away though...

littleredrooster said:
Luther Blisset said:
Just wondering how to make an engine more det prone, and if what the gains could be?
If I'm reading this right...why on earth would you want to build an engine which was more prone to detonation? Are you sure you read this sentence before you posted it?
Max_Torque said:
er, i think you mean "less" not "more"..........
It's saturday night, forgive me! You don't wanna know how many times I had to run spell check lol biggrin

But you're dead right - I did mean less det prone!

So, for someone who doesn't have a multi million dollar R&D budget - any pearls of wisdom?

Simes205

5,025 posts

258 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Stick this on 205gtidrivers.com

KTF

10,683 posts

180 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Phateuk said:
shovelheadrob said:
Ahh detonation, not an illiterate with financial problems after all.
Thought the same rofl
+1 smile

smiffy180

6,029 posts

180 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Luther Blisset said:
Phateuk said:
Thought the same rofl
TBH I have no idea what you're referring to laugh My mistake for the misleading content, hope the title gave the game away though...

littleredrooster said:
Luther Blisset said:
Just wondering how to make an engine more det prone, and if what the gains could be?
If I'm reading this right...why on earth would you want to build an engine which was more prone to detonation? Are you sure you read this sentence before you posted it?
Max_Torque said:
er, i think you mean "less" not "more"..........
It's saturday night, forgive me! You don't wanna know how many times I had to run spell check lol biggrin

But you're dead right - I did mean less det prone!

So, for someone who doesn't have a multi million dollar R&D budget - any pearls of wisdom?
Nope Sunday hehe

Luther Blisset

Original Poster:

402 posts

162 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Simes205 said:
Stick this on 205gtidrivers.com
Fair point. Apart from Max Torque and a few others, the rest want to prove their intelligence by abandoning common sense and nitpicking. Nice way to spend your saturday evening for some I guess lol. Soerry to the genuine helpers for being a touch well oiled, but I'm fighting it off lol

SAhame there's such a waiting list a so much jumping through hoops tough eh? I guess I could learn a bit from Eric Yellow's thread, but it's a more high budget approach.

I'll leave the rest of you to can keep debating whether the S-Line or M-Tech kits impresses the Jones's more....

Luther Blisset

Original Poster:

402 posts

162 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
smiffy180 said:
Nope Sunday hehe
God dammit you horrible pedants lol wink

I feel I might have to keep a very low profile at work tomorrow biggrin

Luther Blisset

Original Poster:

402 posts

162 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Luther Blisset said:
Fair point. Apart from Max Torque and a few others, the rest want to prove their intelligence by abandoning common sense and nitpicking. Nice way to spend your saturday evening for some I guess lol. Soerry to the genuine helpers for being a touch well oiled, but I'm fighting it off lol

SAhame there's such a waiting list a so much jumping through hoops tough eh? I guess I could learn a bit from Eric Yellow's thread, but it's a more high budget approach.

I'll leave the rest of you to can keep debating whether the S-Line or M-Tech kits impresses the Jones's more....
sorry if this came of a bit arsey, it's the drink lol.

And no, this isn't Welshbeef II. This is a one off I swear.

I know when to stop digging - it's usually when I'm sober...

retropower

156 posts

228 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
can't help thinking, with the list that you reel off in the first post, that you already know the answers......

crossy67

1,570 posts

209 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
I know jack about the particulars of your engine but!

Ensuring you have no sharp corners in your combustion chamber is the start, they are the point where det will start 1st. WI will rob power but allow more advance which will bring more power, catch 22. More advance causes det but this can be controlled with more fuel, again catch 22.

For optimum performance you need to sail very close to the wind regarding fuelling and timing. My advice other than sharp bits in chamber would be to gat the best fuelling set up you can afford. When running close to the edge a momentary hiccough in your fuelling can kill your engine faster than no oil.

mighty kitten

431 posts

163 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Cheapest gun wash from a paint suppliers has lots of xylene and toluene which is a good way of raising octane levels . 10% by volume when filling up will do . Twin scroll turbo needs a split pulse manifold to work properly

Luther Blisset

Original Poster:

402 posts

162 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
retropower said:
can't help thinking, with the list that you reel off in the first post, that you already know the answers......
Fair comment, but anything cheaper that I' missing? What makes some engines take big comp and others not? I'm prepared to splash out on the head so to speak, but I'd like to keep within a reasonable budget... this isn't a rallycross engine after all.

AFIUI it these things come with 158mm cast rods, with that kinda length is bending a major issue? Is there anything OEM I could swap it with for cheap?


Luther Blisset

Original Poster:

402 posts

162 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
mighty kitten said:
Cheapest gun wash from a paint suppliers has lots of xylene and toluene which is a good way of raising octane levels . 10% by volume when filling up will do . Twin scroll turbo needs a split pulse manifold to work properly
ould like to do it all 95 octane if poss. I know about the cost in power and torque but as I say - it'd not a pissing contest. Still on the look out for a decent Evo 4-9 tubular twin scroll mani to hack up to fit.

crossy67 said:
I know jack about the particulars of your engine but!

Ensuring you have no sharp corners in your combustion chamber is the start, they are the point where det will start 1st. WI will rob power but allow more advance which will bring more power, catch 22. More advance causes det but this can be controlled with more fuel, again catch 22.

For optimum performance you need to sail very close to the wind regarding fuelling and timing. My advice other than sharp bits in chamber would be to gat the best fuelling set up you can afford. When running close to the edge a momentary hiccough in your fuelling can kill your engine faster than no oil.
That's another thing! I would like to run the lean side of stoich to improvr economy, maybe richening up once at full boost. Is this a bad idea as |I imagine. Bear in mind I'm building it to take the heat.

Would an Evo 9 or 10 turbo deliver without lunching itself at 400hp? Or am I better off with a hybrid - billet 16g wheel (spec pulled out of my ass), 360 plate etc...


Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

228 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
Take any sharp edges off and valve cut outs on the pistons.
Get the biggest intercooler or charge cooler on you can.
Look at compressor maps - size the turbo so its operating at peak efficiency, too small just means too much heat.
High octane fuel.
Good free flowing exhaust.
Get it mapped by some one who knows what they are doing, uses a knockbox or similar.
Lower compression ratio.

etc

andybracing

159 posts

203 months

Sunday 22nd December 2013
quotequote all
timing???