race tyres coefficient of friction
race tyres coefficient of friction
Author
Discussion

motorsportbeng

Original Poster:

200 posts

184 months

Saturday 11th January 2014
quotequote all
I'm doing a university project around vehicle braking and wanted to put some reasonably accurate data in. Does anybody have a rough idea of the coefficient of friction of a general racing slick (GT3 sort of spec.) and that of a semi slick track day tyre (toyo R888 etc.) At a guess I would put the slick at 0.90 - 1.0 and the R888 at 0.75-0.85 but wondered if anyone could enlighten me with any data they may have.
Thanks

VYT

585 posts

286 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
No, tyre adhesion doesn't follow classic physics. I don't know specific numbers but a good road tyre probably has a CF around 1.0. I think I am right in saying that the Dunlop Historic race tyres that I have on my Formula Ford have a CF around 1.3. I have seen numbers greater than 1.7 for modern racing tyres probably higher.

You also need to know that the CF of a tyre typically drops off as load increases. So, if you corner hard and transfer and extra 50% load to the outer tyres their grip does not increase by 50%. This is why light cars with low CG's corner better then heavy cars with a high CG.

Tyres not only rely on friction, they also "bond" to the track surface, (track tyres get sticky when hot) and then there is a mechanical component where the rubber conforms to the track surface and achieves some mechanical keying.

Also, remember that the track surface has a lot to do with the amount of friction (grip) that you can achieve from any given tyre. When I was first driving the local council started to apply Shell Grip on bends etc, awesome amount of grip even from my Morris Marina on battery casing tyres.

Tyres are a complex subject, there will be others here that know much more than I.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

298 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
VYT said:
Tyres not only rely on friction, they also "bond" to the track surface, (track tyres get sticky when hot) and then there is a mechanical component where the rubber conforms to the track surface and achieves some mechanical keying.
pretty much nails it...


Adam205

821 posts

206 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
The best way is to look at what sort of acceleration is being achieved. This would give you a rough estimate of the average Cf. If a car is achieving a maximum of 1.8g with no aero effect then the average Cf is 1.8.

Although I suspect that you're trying to do it the other way round which isn't really possible (too many other effects as previously explained). You can look at tyre data on the Avon website for a reasonable comparison of tyre characteristics (http://www.avonmotorsport.com/resource-centre/downloads) but you won't get an absolute number out.

brianthemagical

57 posts

186 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
Cf also changes with slip angle/percentage.
IIRC it increase up to around 10% and then drops off. The Cf/slip curve can affect how the car handles on the "limit".

VYT

585 posts

286 months

Monday 13th January 2014
quotequote all
Had a dig through the study and found a book called "Going Faster" Skip Barber racing school. It has a fair amount of information on tire performance. Yes there is mention of there being an optimum slip angle which is of course different for every tyre and every condition.

anonymous-user

78 months

Tuesday 14th January 2014
quotequote all
Google "magic formula tyre model"



Chris Eyre

135 posts

247 months

Tuesday 14th January 2014
quotequote all
Mid '90s Super Touring slicks were quoted at a 1.8g capability, 'almost' twice that of road tyres.

9 inch wide.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

298 months

Wednesday 15th January 2014
quotequote all
Chris Eyre said:
Mid '90s Super Touring slicks were quoted at a 1.8g capability, 'almost' twice that of road tyres.

9 inch wide.
problem with that is it's massively car dependant.

on the right car, you could see 3-4G, on the wrong one 1G, all with the same tyre.



jon-

16,534 posts

240 months

Thursday 16th January 2014
quotequote all
Plus, it's not a circle.


RenesisEvo

3,817 posts

243 months

Thursday 16th January 2014
quotequote all
jon- said:
Plus, it's not a circle.

And that's only valid for that particular tyre. Other shapes do exist. Tyre grip is a hideously complex subject.

I can also recommend having a look in Milliken & Milliken, Race Car Vehicle Dynamics. The book for all things vehicle dynamics.