Are BMW horses bigger than Mercedes'? (M6GC Chris Harris)
Are BMW horses bigger than Mercedes'? (M6GC Chris Harris)
Author
Discussion

Andy M

Original Poster:

3,755 posts

285 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2014
quotequote all
http://youtu.be/7-yCupxxErM

The final couple of minutes are interesting viewing.

Vladimir

6,917 posts

184 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2014
quotequote all
Another great CH vid!

Tonyc32

150 posts

153 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2014
quotequote all
Love the slo mo bits

-Z-

8,054 posts

232 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2014
quotequote all
The yanks seem to accept that the M5/M6 have over 600bhp as standard.

Any one on here dyno'd one - especially at Surrey Rolling Road?

HammyHamster

394 posts

198 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
BMW are widely regarded as the best engine builder (closely followed by AMG!)

franki68

11,536 posts

247 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
-Z- said:
The yanks seem to accept that the M5/M6 have over 600bhp as standard.

Any one on here dyno'd one - especially at Surrey Rolling Road?
motortrend dynod the m5 in a test vs e63 s awd ,the bmw produced what it said,the merc was producing 620bhp,they did it because the merc did a 0-60 in 3.2 and the 1/4 mile in 11.7 they dint believe it was 'only 585bhp' and yes I know it doesnt tally up with ch video.

RichardM5

1,846 posts

162 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
Both the UK Sakhir Orange M6 Gran Coupe press vehicles have the following option

Pressefahrzeug
- Leistungsgepruefter Motor

Which translates to 'Press vehicle - Performance Tested Engine'.

I suspect that the press cars are putting out quite a bit more than standard customer cars. The same probably applies to AMG too. Sometimes a 'Press car' will be put against a 'Customer car' and then the official figures don't stack up.

In reality, all three of the cars tested are pretty bloody good, and ballistcally fast. So are the Audi RS7, Porsche Panamera, Aston Rapide etc. The choice will come down to personal preference, looks and cabin ergonomics are very subjective. I'm happy with my choice, and I test drove the others.

Andy M

Original Poster:

3,755 posts

285 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
Interesting, though not surprising.

Wouldn't it be fantastic is one of the car shows/magazines/trading standards had enough balls to independently test a number of manufacturers 'press' cars vs customer cars and present the results to the public.

The manufacturer performance testing the engines of press cars is an obvious thing to do - it would help nobody the car sitting on the back of a recovery vehicle due to an faulty part - but at the same time it is bordering on the dishonest if they truly are presenting heavily tuned cars as those that can be purchased 'off the peg' by UK buyers.

RichardM5

1,846 posts

162 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
I guess with a high performance engine there is always going to be some variability.

What I think would be interesting would be if a tuning company could compare the engine map of a customer and press car. That would show if the 'Performance Testing' was just to ensure a good representative sample or if there was actually some positive action to ensure 'good' performance.

-Z-

8,054 posts

232 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
On that note, my old e90 M3 had 'Press Preperation' on its official options list.

When I investigated it I was told it meant that the engine was blueprinted smile

It was the one that was reviewed by Tiff on 5th gear.

contractor

922 posts

211 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
Does press preparation mean anything other than getting a pre-run in so they can be thrashed straight away?

If they came from the factory with different outputs/emissions would there not be legal issues to deal with regarding type approval/homologation etc?

130R

7,056 posts

232 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
I think CH had a falling out with Ferrari after suggesting their press cars were slightly quicker than customer cars, so I doubt he wants to go down that road again ..

jgy6000

205 posts

196 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
Many car companies do this. In my previous job for a british supercar manufacturer engines were cherry picked (identified by sperial number from the supplier) for certain cars on the production line depending on who the end customer was.

Cheib

25,223 posts

201 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
I am sure the BMW and the Merc both have been breathed on so it's probably a relatively even playing field.

carlosvalderrama

198 posts

224 months

Friday 24th January 2014
quotequote all
Really, you have to consider the whole drivetrain, not just a peak output value.

The quoted hp figure will be a DIN crank value. What actually makes it through to the road is a different question entirely.

Not only do you have drivetrain losses, but the gearing will change the actual thrust at the wheel, the physical force capable of being provided. Although the BMW and Merc have the same number of available ratios, the BMW could have lower ratios for 1st to 5th, and then a stretch to 6 and 7, giving relaxed cruising, but also a ballistic 0-120 time at the expense of an oddly large rev drop into 6th.

Anyone who's quite as anal as me about their gearbox setup in Gran Turismo will be able to relate to this... tongue out

bennyboysvuk

3,494 posts

274 months

Friday 24th January 2014
quotequote all
Another great video and regardless of whether BMW horses are bigger, I hope to see any one of them power-sliding off a roundabout sometime soon.