Definitely not the best looker!
Definitely not the best looker!
Monday 27th January 2014

Motorsport On Monday: 27/1/2014

F1 2014 should be about the tech but we can't help a bit of sniggering at the Ann Summers bodywork



After the first of the 2014 Formula 1 cars were revealed last week, I was left with just one question: will the BBC have to pixelate the McLaren's pornographic nosecone appendage before the watershed? Presumably Jenson's rivals will clock his MP4-29 in their rear view mirrors, burst into laughter and simply forget to brake for the forthcoming corner. Could be a smart strategy.

Team dynamics are going to be interesting...
Team dynamics are going to be interesting...
We've also now seen images of the new Lotus, Ferrari and Sauber. Although none are quite as alarming as the McLaren, it must be said that none of them are terribly handsome either, thanks to the new technical regulations that stipulate a much lower tip to the leading edge of the nosecone for safety reasons.

Remember when the taller, narrower rear wings were introduced a few seasons ago? They looked appalling at first sight, but once the racing proper got underway most of us, I suspect, stopped noticing them. I'd love to believe that the same will be true of these new nosecones, but for the moment I just can't.

A racing car should, of course, be the very definition of function over form, so it's quite understandable that aesthetic merit didn't figure on the designers' lists of priorities. There is a fairly significant consequence for racing fans, though; if what first makes a racing car iconic for decades to come is success on track, second is surely the way it looks (or perhaps third after the way it sounds, depending on your own preferences). That, to me, means that none of this generation of 'you ain't got no alibi' F1 cars will ever be pin-ups years from now.

New turbo engines sound pretty brutal
New turbo engines sound pretty brutal
Talking of the way cars sound, Mercedes became the first team to release a recording of one of the new-for-2014 power units on circuit in this video. To my ear it sounds far from bad, just a little generic for what we're told is the pinnacle of motorsport. That sound could come from any other form of turbocharged circuit racer, no?

Moans aside, I for one cannot wait for the new season to get underway, which it does - in a sense - tomorrow, with the first of the four-day pre-season tests at Jerez in Spain. The weather forecasts suggest most of the week will be dry, with a chance of rain on Wednesday. Watching Lewis and Kimi wrestling their unfamiliar, torque-rich machines in the wet could be an awesome spectacle.

This week's test session will almost certainly be used by the teams as little more than a systems check, given all the new and complicated technologies, and we really should wait until the first qualifying session of the year before we reach any conclusions as to the relative performance of each of the cars. I do not doubt, however, that when a Marussia has the legs on the Ferrari after day one, I'll be as vocal and excitable as everybody else on social media. That's just the fun of pre-season testing, though, isn't it?

Brits on the podium at Daytona in post-ALMS age
Brits on the podium at Daytona in post-ALMS age
Brits on top at Daytona
Away from F1, it was great to see a Briton standing on the top step of the podium at the Rolex 24 at Daytona. Porsche factory driver Nick Tandy co-drove his 911 RSR to victory in the GTLM category, narrowly beating the BMW Z4 GTE of fellow Brit Andy Priaulx to the flag.

The Daytona 24 was the first round of the new Tudor United Sportscar Championship - TUSC for short - an amalgam of the American Le Mans Series and Grand Am. With 12 further races to come this year at North America's most famous circuits, including Watkins Glen and Laguna Seca, there is much to look forward to, not least because Britain looks set to be well represented throughout. I counted some 18 Britons on the Daytona entry list, including the likes of Tandy, Priaulx, Darren Turner, Oliver Gavin and Richard Westbrook, as well as young guns Oliver Webb, Sam Bird and Alex Brundle. Many of that 18 won't contest the full season, but we will still have more than a handful of home-grown drivers plying their trade in the series this year. With Tandy and Priaulx performing so well at Daytona, perhaps we'll be celebrating a British championship win come the end of the year.


Mercedes teases F1's turbo age with a little sound clip...
 

 

Author
Discussion

KMB

Original Poster:

263 posts

247 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Definitely not the best looker!

r11co

6,244 posts

254 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
The droopy cock effect at the front of the McLaren (and the similar concept anteater nose on the Williams) is a clever interpretation of the new regs to keep the tip of the nosecone at the maximum height allowed while still allowing airflow into the floor of the car for aerodynamic reasons.

I was predicting the return of something along the lines of the Williams FW26 walrus nose, and sure enough Lotus have gone with a two-prong nose, but one of the prongs has to be longer than the other to meet with the regs.

Ferrari have, as is typical of them, failed to be innovative and creative with the radical changes to the regs and just gone for a severe downsweep on a traditional nosecone, leading to the car looking like it has a vaccuum cleaner extension on the front.

BlimeyCharlie

984 posts

166 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Not suggesting anything naughty has happened, but when and where would the Mercedes test have taken place that the clip has come from?

That is if it is an actual F1 car and not a test mule? Or a computer generated thingy?

Blayney

2,949 posts

210 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
BlimeyCharlie said:
Not suggesting anything naughty has happened, but when and where would the Mercedes test have taken place that the clip has come from?

That is if it is an actual F1 car and not a test mule? Or a computer generated thingy?
Filming day at silverstone. It's allowed smile they have certain things they can and can't do.

dlockhart

434 posts

196 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
none of this years cars (so far) are posterboys in teh same way the '96 Williams was, I wonder if red bull will produce a peice of eye candy...

squelchuk

27 posts

156 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
dlockhart said:
none of this years cars (so far) are posterboys in teh same way the '96 Williams was, I wonder if red bull will produce a peice of eye candy...
The cars seem to be getting progressively uglier as they launched - with Sauber potentially throwing a spanner in the works of that theory.

So the cars that get launched tomorrow should be uglier still. And, knowing Adrian Newey to be the master of function over form, KERS battery placement aside, the RedBull should look particularly hideous

squelchuk

27 posts

156 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
To be fair with the MP4/29, the paint job and the lighting really don't help.

The chrome effect paint work could be looking a bit dull because of the lighting, or the fact there aren't huge swathes of bright red paint to contrast against. (NB, the lack of title sponsor is slightly worrying. Let's hope Honda don't convince them to go down the 'earth dreams' route of '08)

A mate of mine dropped me a message on Facebook on Friday, after the 4/29 launch to show what a semi decent paint job could do to lift the car's looks. Admittedly, it's retro livery, but it gives you an idea. Photo from
http://wtf1.co.uk/retro-livery-mclaren-mp4-29/


BlimeyCharlie

984 posts

166 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Blayney said:
BlimeyCharlie said:
Not suggesting anything naughty has happened, but when and where would the Mercedes test have taken place that the clip has come from?

That is if it is an actual F1 car and not a test mule? Or a computer generated thingy?
Filming day at silverstone. It's allowed smile they have certain things they can and can't do.
I know they are limited but given it was a 'filming' day there is no 'film' to be found, apart from the above clip. Same with still images. I know there is probably an embargo (I imagine) but is 'filming' the new 'pre-Jerez shakedown test' do we think?
Only one photo of Rosberg, sitting in the cockpit, could be found. Also read that Toro Rosso also 'filmed' at Misano.

So what are the rules on testing/filming this year?



squelchuk

27 posts

156 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT:

Ladies and gentlemen. So far, the F1 cars launched this year have had their nose cones described as "penile", "vaginal" and "...like a prolapsed rectum."

These cars don't look like normal genitalia. If you lady-bits of man-bits look like this, GO AND SEE YOUR GP

Anubis

1,029 posts

203 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
That site has a very good point - why don't McLaren just paint the nose?

Before / After:


Better still, use the old style livery:


squelchuk

27 posts

156 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Well 22.1 of the sporting regulations says,

"Each competitor will also be permitted to carry out two Promotional Events (PE) with the above cars which will not be considered TCC. A PE shall be defined as an event in which a competitor participates purely for marketing or promotional purposes. No such test may exceed 100km in length and only tyres manufactured specifically for this purpose by the appointed supplier may be used."

If you're an F1 geek (like me), you can read the regs here
http://www.formula1.com/inside_f1/rules_and_regula...

squelchuk

27 posts

156 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
dlockhart said:
none of this years cars (so far) are posterboys in teh same way the '96 Williams was, I wonder if red bull will produce a peice of eye candy...
Ah, for me, it's the MP4/20 or the MP4/19

chunoo

1,166 posts

259 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
I have said it before and i'll say it again.

I still think it's sad that F1 has lost it's uniqueness now to the general spectator (sound).

Yes, that clip sounds ok, but it could be any generic race car.

I had pretty much decided that last years British GP would be the last for me.

Why on earth would I want to pay £200 for a ticket to watch cars go round a track that look and sound just like a lower formulae?

I will still watch on TV (as long as it's not as boring as last year), but my days of going to a gp are over unfortunately. :-(

HustleRussell

26,137 posts

184 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Dan, Do you really think the McLaren is more alarming than that Ferrari? confused

lestiq

705 posts

193 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
These new lower profile front ends, they have a safety purpose?



if someone was to drive side on into another car, a very realistic scenario, whats to stop the car sliding up the newly profiled death ramp and clouting the driver?

I think the new car looks okay from the side, +1 to painting the nose as suggested above.

Benrad

654 posts

173 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
lestiq said:
These new lower profile front ends, they have a safety purpose?



if someone was to drive side on into another car, a very realistic scenario, whats to stop the car sliding up the newly profiled death ramp and clouting the driver?

I think the new car looks okay from the side, +1 to painting the nose as suggested above.
The front will be a deformable crash structure so it wouldn't scoop it up. The idea is to stop the car hitting the top edge of a tyre rather than the bottom when in a braking zone.

Also Daytona saw the 24hr debut of a young british driver featured on the site recently (in the Radical RXC piece). Bradley Smith was in car 31 and came 11th in class due to car issues but showed great pace through the race

mrmr96

13,736 posts

228 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
lestiq said:
whats to stop the car sliding up the newly profiled death ramp and clouting the driver?
I imagine that the nose would be designed to deform? Good question though.

patrickgovier

70 posts

188 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
Anubis said:
That site has a very good point - why don't McLaren just paint the nose?

Before / After:


Better still, use the old style livery:

Good that looks miles better, I hope they copy this idea.

williamp

20,124 posts

297 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
It depends on who their main sponsor is going to be....

Eric Mc

124,897 posts

289 months

Monday 27th January 2014
quotequote all
What types of threads belong in the F1 forum?