Brake pads
Author
Discussion

CTrickle

Original Poster:

300 posts

208 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Morning all,

Need pads for my car but unsure what to ask for, are they standard Ford pattern? I could get them off and take a pic if that helps?!

Also type, doing road and track.

Any help appreciated.

Thanks
Edward.

Aeroscreens

466 posts

255 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Judging by your profile your car is a year older than mine so I'm guessing you have the standard 2 pot calipers front and rear with solid discs as opposed to the Caterham branded 4 pots and ventilated discs or other after market such as hi-Spec etc.

If the former i.e standard set-up then I use Mintex 1144 on the front. There are two options, ref MGB533M1144 which is the 'normal' pad and MGB535M1144 which also fits the standard caliper, but it has a larger pad area which is a good thing but will need new discs.

For the rear, no idea until I check as it's a long time since I changed them, but I'm pretty sure they're just 'standard'. Same pattern as these. If using 1144s many of us use the uprated rears to give a better balance.

I use the 'larger' 1144 pads on the front with standard rears and find with my Zetec that this balance is fine for sprinting/hillclimbing and touring etc.....


CTrickle

Original Poster:

300 posts

208 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Top man, thank you very much.

They are indeed 2 pot callipers.

Red Seven

158 posts

226 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
I would advise against using the MGB535M1144 because they will shift the balance a little too much to the front.
MGB533M1144's and the rears that "Aeroscreens" links to work very well.

Gingerbread Man

9,173 posts

242 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
My understanding is that as the Caterham is overbraked by the rear as standard, uprating the front pads helps to adjust this indifference. Mintex 1144 on the front, leaving the rear pads standard. This seems to be the common setup with the standard brakes.

Does anyone know what the standard rear pads Caterham sell actually are?

RobGT81

5,229 posts

215 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Gingerbread Man said:
My understanding is that as the Caterham is overbraked by the rear as standard, uprating the front pads helps to adjust this indifference. Mintex 1144 on the front, leaving the rear pads standard. This seems to be the common setup with the standard brakes.

+1

CTrickle

Original Poster:

300 posts

208 months

Wednesday 5th February 2014
quotequote all
Hi All,

Thank you for the reply's, I got the pads off and definitely think they could do another year....! (see pics below)

Could some one confirm which model these are, I'm not upgrading the fronts at the moment so I'm going replace these with something 'middle of the road' if you see what I mean. A slight upgrade but nothing serious, maybe EBC pads?

Anywhoo! I could do with knowing what pattern these are so I can order some.

Any help really appreciated.

Ed.






CTrickle

Original Poster:

300 posts

208 months

Wednesday 5th February 2014
quotequote all
I have ordered these:

http://www.ebcbrakeshop.co.uk/caterham-seven-20-19...

I assume they are correct...?

HustleRussell

26,488 posts

189 months

Wednesday 5th February 2014
quotequote all
Sorry, I'm too late, but-

-I and many others have had wildly inconsistent results with Greenstuff
and
-Uprating the pad material at the rear and not the front is a really bad idea, especially on a Caterham (even tempoarily).

In my experience, the best results even on race cars with your braking system were acheived with upgraded front pads and standard rears, as Aeroscreens, GingerbreadMan and Rob GT81 agreed unaminously in this thread.

Edited by HustleRussell on Wednesday 5th February 12:06

CTrickle

Original Poster:

300 posts

208 months

Wednesday 5th February 2014
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
Sorry, I'm too late, but-

-I and many others have had wildly inconsistent results with Greenstuff
and
-Uprating the pad material at the rear and not the front is a really bad idea, especially on a Caterham (even tempoarily).

In my experience, the best results even on race cars with your braking system were acheived with upgraded front pads and standard rears, as Aeroscreens, GingerbreadMan and Rob GT81 agreed unaminously in this thread.

Edited by HustleRussell on Wednesday 5th February 12:06
Hmm, thank you for that. I will be replacing the fronts at some time in the future but I'd put yellow stuff in then so there would be the a step through performance.

I did listen to the previous posts as I'd initially thought I should replace the rears with yellow so that I would end up with the same all round.

Granted I'll have to keep an eye on handling under braking!

Aeroscreens

466 posts

255 months

Wednesday 5th February 2014
quotequote all
...and my reasoning for the larger pads at the front were to give improved front end braking as the Zetec is a heavy old lump compared to other engines (with the exception of the Vauxhall).

one eyed mick

1,189 posts

190 months

Wednesday 5th February 2014
quotequote all
Those pads in your picture are bksed and I would not even like to think what the discs are like .New pads and discs would be rquired for me to take the car out of the garage!!!!

Red Seven

158 posts

226 months

Wednesday 5th February 2014
quotequote all
Some years ago, when I tried green stuff, I found them very unpredictable.
Yellow stuff are a more track based pad that need some heat in them to work correctly.
Fronts that don't work when they are cold, and rears that may or may not work, does not sound very good to me!
Why, when most suggest Mintex, are you thinking of EBC?

cambuscat

153 posts

200 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
Another vote for 1144 fronts and standard rears to maintain decent balance. (and replace these pads plus check discs)

David

CTrickle

Original Poster:

300 posts

208 months

Thursday 6th February 2014
quotequote all
Red Seven said:
Some years ago, when I tried green stuff, I found them very unpredictable.
Yellow stuff are a more track based pad that need some heat in them to work correctly.
Fronts that don't work when they are cold, and rears that may or may not work, does not sound very good to me!
Why, when most suggest Mintex, are you thinking of EBC?
In answer to the Mintex question - because the EBC pads were half as much money.

I appreciate all the worry about 'balance' etc. I enjoy and will drive the car to it's own characteristics so will work with what I have and when I replace the front pads which I appreciate are still the most important I will invest good money, probably in Mintex as they have had such a good review. The EBC Greenstuff pads are not really a performance pad so I can't see them being noticeably better/worse than the originals (not the bits of metal I removed!).

My main problem is I have bought a car which I am aware needs allot of TLC, I have done some pretty major work on it and the money pot is not bottomless so I now have to be sensible for a few months.

Thank you for all your help.

HustleRussell

26,488 posts

189 months

Friday 7th February 2014
quotequote all
CTrickle said:
In answer to the Mintex question - because the EBC pads were half as much money.

I appreciate all the worry about 'balance' etc. I enjoy and will drive the car to it's own characteristics so will work with what I have and when I replace the front pads which I appreciate are still the most important I will invest good money, probably in Mintex as they have had such a good review. The EBC Greenstuff pads are not really a performance pad so I can't see them being noticeably better/worse than the originals (not the bits of metal I removed!).

My main problem is I have bought a car which I am aware needs allot of TLC, I have done some pretty major work on it and the money pot is not bottomless so I now have to be sensible for a few months.

Thank you for all your help.
If budget is tight, send the EBCs back for a full refund while you still can. This has the added benefit of saving you changing the rear brake pads for a second time when you get fed up of the severe brake imbalance trying to kill you. Even the Green Stuff pads are a much higher performance pad than you want to fit to the rear. You think fitting Yellow stuff pads to the front will redress the balance but it won't.
If you do fit the pads, you will have far too much braking effort at the rear and the result of that will be the car trying to swap ends every time you brake moderately hard in anything but a perfectly straight line on a perfectly flat road.
You might imagine you can drive around this but driving a car which is overbraked at the rear is misery.

Gingerbread Man

9,173 posts

242 months

Friday 7th February 2014
quotequote all
I used to use my car daily. I recall 2 times that I had to brake really hard, not through the choice of driving, but through not wanting to crash. Both times the rear swung right out causing me not only to be braking hard but also trying to turn into the back end as it is now over the white line in the opposite lane. An unexpected side effect of a hard lock on of the brakes. Luckily my rear end never ended up in immediate danger.

Fun times all round.

CTrickle

Original Poster:

300 posts

208 months

Saturday 8th February 2014
quotequote all
Ok ok ok, I thought it would be ok but in fairness you can't all be wrong! Ha ha!

Are you all of the opinion you have to have Mintex or does anyone agree that I could use yellow stuff in the front?

Thanks again for all your advice.

Gingerbread Man

9,173 posts

242 months

Saturday 8th February 2014
quotequote all
I just followed the Mintex brick road. It was already laid out for me. Who paved it, i'm not sure.

I am after a cheap set of (standard) rear pads though. What would be an acceptable brand for this? Bar 'the Caterham shop items', what actually are they?

TubbyNorman

215 posts

210 months

Sunday 9th February 2014
quotequote all
Granted I'll have to keep an eye on handling under braking!..............................................

BIT BLOODY LATE THEN MATE !