First car dilemma.
Author
Discussion

JoeCastle

Original Poster:

572 posts

152 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 22 March 2016 at 14:48

kiethton

14,648 posts

210 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Fabia Vrs?

Fiesta ST?

The above would feature for me above any of the french offerings

LukeR94

2,218 posts

171 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
The GTI 180 was a horrible car when it first came out and still is, so cast that off.

To be honest mate I would spend a few months in a 1.4/1.6 hatch rather than jumping straight to a hot hatch, I know you say you maybe ready as thats what I thought when I first started driving, but trust me, you are not, you wont believe me, but as many will tell you on here, you a very likely to bin it.

Just get to grips with how the road works and different cars grip levels, how cars handle, being able to modulate steering and throttle inputs in something cheaper and slower, then by all means go for something quicker.

Im 19 myself, I had to come to terms with this when I first learned but trust me, 6months/1year in a smaller, slower car does everyone the world of good.

Edit: Re-read, any of these will do fine "Saxo Vtr, Peugeot 106 quicksilver, Suzuki Ignis Sport, 306 Dturbo, MGZR"!

JoeCastle

Original Poster:

572 posts

152 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Yes, i did say i had suspicions of ending up in a bush, that's why the lower output warmer hatches sound like a good idea for now. Also little things like petrol. The extra 800 i'd save on insurance could certainly go a long way with parking and fuel!

Krikkit

27,938 posts

211 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Get yourself a 106 Quicksilver if you have qualms about diving straight into a hot hatch; good suspension, great drive, just a bit down on power compared to the full fat GTI.

dave_s13

14,028 posts

299 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
I would suggest you buy my Toyota celica 190 t sport!

Practical, economical, safe and only goes quick when you ring it's neck.

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/t...



Edited by dave_s13 on Monday 3rd February 13:47

samdale

2,860 posts

214 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
What's the budget? If I wanted a fun car but had to sit in traffic for an hour I'd also want it to be a nice place to be so maybe something newer?
C2, Suzuki swift sport?

Edited by samdale on Monday 3rd February 13:51

rustyabarth

103 posts

160 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Circa 2005 Punto Sporting?
6 speed gearbox, ABS, ESP, Aircon, 1.4 16v, 0-60 9.8, cheap to tax and insure and good on petrol too.

Having owned one it was fantastic fun, the engine and gearbox are a perfect match and it even makes a decent twincam noise too

JoeCastle

Original Poster:

572 posts

152 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
samdale said:
What's the budget? If I wanted a fun car but had to sit in traffic for an hour I'd also want it to be a nice place to be so maybe something newer?
C2 GT, Suzuki swift sport?
My friend had a c2 GT. Constantly getting parts replaced on it, so that put me off of it. He bought a GTi-6 for £250 that he preferred so much more (And cost less in parts) he sold off the C2. Realistcly, up to 5 grand including insurance. Obviously if i can spend less money, all the better. Clean unmodified VTR's would cost me £2500 with insurance, and then the leftover cash goes into the kitty for the next car in 3 years.

SteBrown91

3,131 posts

159 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Fiesta ST would be my shout. Cheap, reliable and easy to find. Go and handle well enough to have a bit of safe fun but not so fast you will kill yourself

JoeCastle

Original Poster:

572 posts

152 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
dave_s13 said:
I would suggest you buy my Toyota celica 190 t sport!

Practical, economical, safe and only goes quick when you ring it's neck.

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/t...
Unfortunatley, you're in Yorkshire, and I'm in Surrey wink

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Saxo VTR is a good option. Quite an underrated little car due to the chav image but if you can find a fully working, original example they're great to drive and cheap to run.

C.A.R.

3,992 posts

218 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
And taking a 190 and keeping it on-cam down a bumpy B-road is not easy, I don't claim to be a 'driving hero' but after 6 years on the road I found it difficult with the constant on/off power between certain revs. Brilliant fun, though!

I'm currently rocking in a 306 DTurbo, I think it's a great car, but it's really feeling its age now. Worn rear beam means that I had to pick up another one second hand at the weekend and maintenance is required more frequently than on a newer car - I'd say I'm under that car once every 3 months doing something. If you're up for it, then they can be run for peanuts (cost less than £500 last year and that included a new clutch and 2 new tyres together with regular servicing).

For a similar albeit more modern alternative I think the Fabia VRS might be a bit of a better option, just to get you used to driving swiftly for starters, before going for something 'full fat'.

_Neal_

2,953 posts

249 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
I'd add the (older) Fiesta Zetec-S to the list. Like the VTR finding an unmolested/unrusted one may be tricky, but they're meant to be very good. Cheap too, and "warm" rather than hot.

I liked my MG ZR (1.4).

T1berious

2,671 posts

185 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
I'm going to mirror some comments here and say "sporty, 1st car? don't do it!".

Go for a decent Diesel (Golf, Polo, Focus etc) Get the best you can afford, put a bit aside for servicing, consumables and get used to the outlay of a motor.

Once you've got a nice taste for what you can stomach cost wise deal with scratching your PH itch.

Personnaly I'd sink the any cash into a house ASAP but maybe you already have smile

What's your budget?

T1b

_Neal_

2,953 posts

249 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
T1berious said:
I'm going to mirror some comments here and say "sporty, 1st car? don't do it!".

Go for a decent Diesel (Golf, Polo, Focus etc) Get the best you can afford, put a bit aside for servicing, consumables and get used to the outlay of a motor.

Once you've got a nice taste for what you can stomach cost wise deal with scratching your PH itch.

Personnaly I'd sink the any cash into a house ASAP but maybe you already have smile

What's your budget?

T1b
Why diesel? As said above, cheap small-engined petrol is the way forward in my view, get used to something that needs revs and is enjoyable to drive.

T1berious

2,671 posts

185 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Just because of the predicted mileage the O/P stated. IMHO.

Then again, it's also budget dependant. from my limited experience when I was in my early 20's every bill was a bit of a shock (of which my 1st car had plenty).

Golf GTD will still pull sub 8.0 0-60? And should be "fairly" reliable with "lowish" running costs.




BJG1

5,966 posts

242 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
JoeCastle said:
Yes, i did say i had suspicions of ending up in a bush, that's why the lower output warmer hatches sound like a good idea for now. Also little things like petrol. The extra 800 i'd save on insurance could certainly go a long way with parking and fuel!
I don't think you're more likely to put a 182 in a ditch than you are a 106 Quicksilver, to be honest. I'd pick the one most likely to allow you to leave it with all of your limbs.

I passed at 21 . I runa Clio for a year, then a Mini One D for another year before getting a Boxster S (had for a year). I am far more nervous of crashing now I've gone from the Boxster to a TVR Sagaris than when I went from the Mini to the Porsche, despite the on-paper difference being much greater between the Bini and the Porsche.

I had a 1.2 Clio as my first car, it was fantastic fun but don't expect anything electrical to actually work. Think if I were in your position I'd be looking at a 172 or a 182, or anything similar in that sort of bracket (Fiesta ST?). Honestly wouldn't worry about them being too quick for you - the newer it is the easier it'll be to drive anyway.

A 106 driven on the limit is just as likely to end up in a tree as a 182 and whatever you have you'll either be driving like an idiot or you won't. Different story of you're going into a RWD, 200+ BHP machine but otherwise I wouldn't worry about it.


BJG1

5,966 posts

242 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
Oh and if I were you I'd probably by a Civic Type R.

JoeCastle

Original Poster:

572 posts

152 months

Monday 3rd February 2014
quotequote all
BJG1 said:
Oh and if I were you I'd probably by a Civic Type R.
The Accord Type R actually tickled my fancy when i saw the price they can be picked up for!