'Surplus' giraffe put down at Copenhagen Zoo
'Surplus' giraffe put down at Copenhagen Zoo
Author
Discussion

Halb

Original Poster:

53,012 posts

207 months

Sunday 9th February 2014
quotequote all
He would have had a nice home in Yorkshire.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-26098935

bexVN

14,690 posts

235 months

Sunday 9th February 2014
quotequote all
Story in mail today that Longleat put to sleep a young lioness ans some cubs, due to aggression! (and overbreeding apparently)

Difficult to get the full story but sounds pretty atrocious either way. I read about the giraffe earlier. Zoo's are a law unto themselves. Not sure how the inbreeding was allowed to happen in the first place and why did they wait til he was 18 months old to destroy him?

anonymous-user

78 months

Sunday 9th February 2014
quotequote all
Sometimes I wonder where the real risk of inbreeding manifests itself.

In this case the zoo owners have shown appalling judgement. I wish them and their animal prison nothing but harm.

Jasandjules

72,035 posts

253 months

Sunday 9th February 2014
quotequote all
I couldn't quite believe it when I read it, along with the Lioness and her cubs. Tragic and disgraceful.

shoebag

1,137 posts

276 months

Sunday 9th February 2014
quotequote all
Unbelievably sad and sickening. Marius was offered a home with other male giraffes in the UK and they still killed him. Copenhagen Zoo need to have their zoo licence taken away.

52classic

2,634 posts

234 months

Sunday 9th February 2014
quotequote all
A zoo spokesman is reported to have said that if Yorkshire Wildlife Park has room for additional animals they should choose a 'more genetically valuable species.'

bexVN

14,690 posts

235 months

Sunday 9th February 2014
quotequote all
52classic said:
A zoo spokesman is reported to have said that if Yorkshire Wildlife Park has room for additional animals they should choose a 'more genetically valuable species.'
I'd have thought that was their decision to make.

52classic

2,634 posts

234 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Sure! But isn't that typical of the moral high ground that seems to accompany anything backed by a 'Euro Directive?'

paintman

7,852 posts

214 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
52classic said:
A zoo spokesman is reported to have said that if Yorkshire Wildlife Park has room for additional animals they should choose a 'more genetically valuable species.'
Perhaps the same could be said of the zoo spokesman.

VinceFox

20,566 posts

196 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
I'm struggling to believe this one. How the hell does someone remain in their post after making this sort of decision when other zoos had already offered the animal a home?

fking aholes.

Kiltie

7,505 posts

270 months

Tuesday 11th February 2014
quotequote all
Chris Packham comments on this in today's Guardian.

Reckons it'll have done huge PR damage to zoos all over Europe and beyond.

Saleen836

12,300 posts

233 months

Tuesday 11th February 2014
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
I couldn't quite believe it when I read it, along with the Lioness and her cubs. Tragic and disgraceful.
Longleat safari park posted a statement on their Facebook page a couple of days ago informing everyone for their reasoning.

GokTweed

3,799 posts

175 months

Tuesday 11th February 2014
quotequote all
It's not tragic or disgraceful the lioness was genetically flawed due to massive inbreeding. Herself and her cubs had big quality of life issues and so had to be put down on grounds of welfare. And I believe there was a similar reason for not keeping the giraffe as it was too closely related to breed from. To be fair it was fed to the lions and did provide good education to the kids watching the dissection. It's a shame it had to be euthanised but it probably raised a lot of attention about the zoo and the animals it keeps which may hopefully help in the long run. Whether you believe in zoos or not is another debate.

Edited by GokTweed on Tuesday 11th February 21:24

bexVN

14,690 posts

235 months

Tuesday 11th February 2014
quotequote all
It still doesn't excuse how the inbreeding was allowed to happen in the first place

Melman Giraffe

6,794 posts

242 months

Tuesday 11th February 2014
quotequote all
Wrong on every level RIP my friend


GokTweed

3,799 posts

175 months

Tuesday 11th February 2014
quotequote all
bexVN said:
It still doesn't excuse how the inbreeding was allowed to happen in the first place
Of course not and someone's going to have to take the rap for that. They were casualties of human cock ups which seems to be the case more and more often these days!

bernhund

3,798 posts

217 months

Wednesday 12th February 2014
quotequote all
How can anyone claim 'genes' being a problem when he should have been wandering around Africa among the other giraffes, which no doubt have a greater variety of genes? Sounds like an own gaol...sorry..goal for zoos.

Granville

983 posts

195 months

Wednesday 12th February 2014
quotequote all
So 20-30 animals at that zoo being destroyed every year!!!!!!!! They clearly do not have a very good breeding programme in place, or are they allowing this over / in-breeding purely to feed the lions?

If they didn't want him, then re-home to the many centres that were offering to take him, or at least castrate him. To allow him to get to 18 months and then just destroy him is barbaric just to keep their breeding gene strong. There was nothing preventing him going to a new home and breeding or living out his life happy and alive.

They should be ashamed of themselves.

Turbodiesel1976

1,958 posts

194 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
This story has pissed me off alot - he looked like a lovely giraffe, zoos are supposed to look after animals not blast them in the head with a fking bolt gun. Its just wrong

TwigtheWonderkid

48,181 posts

174 months

Thursday 13th February 2014
quotequote all
Turbodiesel1976 said:
This story has pissed me off alot - he looked like a lovely giraffe,
Have you ever seen a giraffe and thought "he looks like a wrong 'un?"

They all look lovely. Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the situation, I don't think cuteness should be a deciding factor. If they'd destroyed a nest of rare parasitic wasps, no one would give two hoots. That's what's wrong!