Comfiest snotter
Author
Discussion

vallance5

Original Poster:

181 posts

168 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
So I have done a lot of searching with regards to the comfiest snotter. I am looking for a car with a max 2.5k budget to use as a daily run around/snotter. It has to be reasonable to run which kind of rules out the massive petrol V8 stuff (iv heard the Lexus LS is unbelievably comfortable and quiet).

So far top of my list is as follow:

Rover 75 connoisseur (2.0 D)
Volvo S60 (D5)
Jeep Grand Cherokee (V8 with LPG conversion)

Just wondering peoples thoughts and if they have any other suggestions or experience it would be much appreciated!

Cheers

otolith

68,933 posts

234 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Saab 9-5.

h0b0

9,071 posts

226 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Out of that list the Volvo is a clear winner in a different league. The Rover was crap the day it was released. The interior was trying too hard to hark back to 1950's. The Grad Cherokee isn't a comfortable snotter. We had a 5.7l HEMI engined one in the family for 5 years. It works in the US but not in the IK. The Volvo has the comfiest seats of almost any car and, if bought with the right options, the best radio.

GenePoolReject13

1,970 posts

219 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Lexus LS with LPG? And yes they are very comfortable.

HustleRussell

26,527 posts

190 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Citroen C5 HDI.

P-Jay

11,405 posts

221 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Something Citroen / Peugeot - you can argue all day about their merit, but they make incredibly comfortable seats.

tdm34

7,498 posts

240 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
h0b0 said:
The Rover was crap the day it was released. The interior was trying too hard to hark back to 1950's.
I've driven a 75 for a year now, and yes the interior is a bit retro, but it's well screwed together and it's ride quality is excellent very wafty a bit like your favourite armchair.

If you want a more modern interior look at a ZT which is a little more modern inside....

And they weren't crap the day they were released, they were very well reviewed...

They have their quirks and some signs of cost cutting, but the owners website is probably the best i've seen and they have a very loyal following, over the last year it's averaged 51mpg over 16,000 miles, i've had to replace a clutch master cylinder and an alternator in that time, but they were the originals from new!

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
I've had a couple of S60's and a 75 - in my optinon the 75 rode better and was generally more comfortable, but the S60's seats were more supportive.

The only way to really know is to get yourself a test drive - different people find different things comfortable.

simonej

5,403 posts

210 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
h0b0 said:
Out of that list the Volvo is a clear winner in a different league. The Rover was crap the day it was released. The interior was trying too hard to hark back to 1950's. The Grad Cherokee isn't a comfortable snotter. We had a 5.7l HEMI engined one in the family for 5 years. It works in the US but not in the IK. The Volvo has the comfiest seats of almost any car and, if bought with the right options, the best radio.
Having owned both the Rover and the Volvo I can tell you you're wrong. smile The Rover is certainly not crap, in fact I would say it feels better put together than the Volvo (although the styling is obviously a matter of taste).

The Rover rides the bumps and crap country roads better than the Volvo but I will concede that the Volvo seats are super comfy. That being said, the Volvo gave me terrible back ache whereas the Rover doesn't. The D5 is a really nice engine though and that would swing it for me (but only with a manual box).

Andy665

4,166 posts

258 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Saab 9-5 Aero - decently quick, had mine for 3 months now and averaging 34mpg which I think is extremely good

Parts are dirt cheap as well, just bought new front and rear discs and pads for £140

h0b0

9,071 posts

226 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
tdm34 said:
h0b0 said:
The Rover was crap the day it was released. The interior was trying too hard to hark back to 1950's.
I've driven a 75 for a year now, and yes the interior is a bit retro, but it's well screwed together and it's ride quality is excellent very wafty a bit like your favourite armchair.

If you want a more modern interior look at a ZT which is a little more modern inside....

And they weren't crap the day they were released, they were very well reviewed...

They have their quirks and some signs of cost cutting, but the owners website is probably the best i've seen and they have a very loyal following, over the last year it's averaged 51mpg over 16,000 miles, i've had to replace a clutch master cylinder and an alternator in that time, but they were the originals from new!
I had the V6 for a few days years ago and have to say I completely agree with this review,

James May drives the Rover 75

And on top of that it was painfully slow. It was like driving a turbo car with a knackered turbo

vallance5

Original Poster:

181 posts

168 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Thanks for all the input guys. I think I might drop the Cherokee from the list but I have read that its like driving around in your favourite sofa..

Iv heard mostly good things about the 75 and even looked at the release reviews which remark on how comfortable it was.

Things like performance and styling don't bother me when buying this kind of car. I just want something that will be cheap to run and last. The Volvo might pip the rover in terms of equipment though.

As for the Saab I read that getting parts for them was difficult but sounds like this might not be the case?

Keep the suggestions coming!

Hooli

32,278 posts

230 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Jag XJ40 and two grand change, it's worked for me.

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
E39 5 series?

I currently run a Vauxhall Omega which is also a very comfortable big car for very little cash.

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
vallance5 said:
The Volvo might pip the rover in terms of equipment though.
Get one with the winter pack and leather (most have this anyway). The seats are about as good as it gets and the pro logic stereo is very surprising. They also have a far nicer engine than the Rover and IMO don't look 'cheap'. The other half uses my old one now an it is just turned 200K, it'll be sold soon but it owes us absolutely nothing. Great cars.



edc

9,652 posts

281 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Had a Jeep GC. It is comfy until you get to series of bumps or corners. The suspension is so wallowy that it really is boat-like. If you can cope with that then it is a decent enough car.

vallance5

Original Poster:

181 posts

168 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Looks like the Volvo is getting the most votes. Off to the classifieds for a rummage biggrin

Contigo

3,139 posts

239 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Peugeot 406 Executive Turbo. Buckets of low down torque and leather seats to die for. I cannot find a more comfortable snotter if I try.


Northernchimp

1,282 posts

162 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
S80. Cheaper than an S60, and no less comfortable.

MondeoMan1981

2,458 posts

213 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
S80 diesel?

Or what about a Pug 607HDi , that'll be cheap as chips.

If you can find a good condition early 406 exec with the 1.9td - that would literally be cheap as chips - it'll run of veggie oil. As would an Omega 2.5td.