Anyone know about history of P7HPC
Anyone know about history of P7HPC
Author
Discussion

doclip

Original Poster:

349 posts

252 months

Thursday 20th February 2014
quotequote all
Hi there ,
Does anyone out there happen to know about the history of P7HPC for sale with Woodcote- 1996 blue top Vauxhall 2.0 dry sump ,cycle wings ,full cage ,tillets .Im guessing its not a genuine HPC but a post hoc conversion .
I'm assuming it has done a fair amount of track work looking at the spec -and as such i would have serious concerns that its had a hard life -having bought a track spec xflow many years back which went bang soon after i bought it and needed an expensive total engine rebuild .
Thanks

cambuscat

153 posts

200 months

Friday 21st February 2014
quotequote all
Can't help you with the car but glad to see you are still lurking and considering buying another 7. Used to follow your various postings (childrens' swimming to asthma) on Blatchat and met when you rushed over to chat to our group of 7's at Macrihanish a few years ago.

David

snapper seven

713 posts

243 months

Friday 21st February 2014
quotequote all
Sure you know but you'd need the chassis number to confirm if its a genuine HPC or not. Odd looking transmission tunnel though with its square edges.

You say blue top. Are you referring to the spark plug cover? If blue then that would denote it is a Swindon Stage 1 (218) engine...unless the owner resprayed it of course!?

Cheers
SS

Edit to add - in fairness to Stuart, I hear he has a decent reputation and he has not described it as an HPC in the ad.

Edited by snapper seven on Friday 21st February 13:58

Tango7

693 posts

255 months

Friday 21st February 2014
quotequote all
It was a my brother's car a while ago and is an HPC with a Swindon upgrade. My brother was 3rd owner (I think) and it was definitely a well looked after road car with light use then. Chap who bought it from brother put the cage and tillets in and removed the tunnel top to be a bit more functional I think. He was going to use it for club sprinting and the odd track day. I don't think it has had that much track use at all despite its appearance - well, no more than any other Caterham owned by a club member.

i might have a few photos knocking around if you are interested and wanted to see what it was like.

HTH

Edited by Tango7 on Friday 21st February 17:38

TeflonT

1,670 posts

292 months

Friday 21st February 2014
quotequote all
In 1996 Vauxhall cars were supplied with a refurb engine by Caterham, and still got a certificate of newness. So it was probably originally a std VX. The fact that it has a blue cam cover does not guarantee its a Swindon engine, and even if it is, Caterham got Swindon to supply the upgrades to a price, not a spec.

I do have an idea that P7HPC looked quite different to this in the past, but I could be wrong.


Mavic82

92 posts

189 months

Friday 21st February 2014
quotequote all
The tunnel top is normal for a centre handbrake car.

I have say the vx engine is quite robust so if the car looks well maintained I would not be concerned.

Tango7

693 posts

255 months

Friday 21st February 2014
quotequote all
Dug out out a bit more info on the car that shows it is a genuine HPC model registered in 1997. The chassis reference commences SDKRDKHVX

doclip

Original Poster:

349 posts

252 months

Friday 21st February 2014
quotequote all
Thanks v much for all of this useful info ....
I'm indeed ummhing and arrhing about another 7 -currently have an old mans XKR conv as I like the comfort and practicality -but obviously still hanker after the feel of a 7 and everything it stands for -after all i had four Caterhams incl a rather nice VXE back in the day when i was younger .
Curiously I also miss pedestrians and other drivers waving and smiling as I drive by -that's really quite nice .
I take what was said about the VX lump being robust but i'm not sure if the internals would have been upgraded to take a lot of sprinting or track work -eg forged pistons ,steel bits etc . It does however seem to be dry sumped which i suppose is good to know .I ended up having to put an accusump on my VXE to stop the putative oil starvation which my oily warned me about -we also used some thick gloup to keep the pressure up -as i recall 20-60 Rockoil .
A few hours on the track or sprinting is equivalent to many more hours of fast road use -which is OK as long as its been well looked after .
I recall taking my VXE on the track at Knockhill and thought i was going quick enough ,until the instructor took me out and i couldn't believe the difference -just the way he balanced the car on the throttle was a real eye opener .
Also i see that Revolutions in Perth [who sells Morgans] are now a recognised Caterham agent -I used to take my 7 to Mike Stewart in Errol who is a top oily and a lovely bloke ,but liked to to take his time .
There is just something about the old school sound and charm of a VX on webers ,which makes me want to go back there -but perhaps like old girlfriends they should be left alone with the all the nice memories intact .
Maybe i need to take some brave pills and get back to the 7 again -or maybe do the sensible thing and upgrade my XKR to the later X150 model .



doclip

Original Poster:

349 posts

252 months

Friday 21st February 2014
quotequote all
Hi Tango -do you happen to know about the internals on the Swindon engine when your bro had it -ie were they upgraded or not or is most of it std spec -crank,rods,cam,lifters etc -was the quaife box straight cut ?

Tango7

693 posts

255 months

Saturday 22nd February 2014
quotequote all
Hi Doclip,

According to the first owner who had the Swindon upgrade work done:

All engine work had been done by Caterham & AFAIR it included head port & skim, matched manifold, cams, solid lifters, valve springs & retainers, 48 DCOE, verniers etc. The bottom I think was standard apart from rod bolts & pocketed pistons.

Upgraded around a year later, solid tappet conversion in around
2000. Sure that the car had a steel flywheel

doclip

Original Poster:

349 posts

252 months

Saturday 22nd February 2014
quotequote all
thanks tango

rubystone

11,254 posts

288 months

Saturday 22nd February 2014
quotequote all
Loved my HPC. Loved my SLR. Loved my R500 come to think of it...

I remember Doclip from a long time ago...if Tango gives it thumbs up it ought to be a good'un..I'm just surprised he hasn't tried to broker a deal on it biglaugh

Tango7

693 posts

255 months

Saturday 22nd February 2014
quotequote all
rubystone said:
.I'm just surprised he hasn't tried to broker a deal on it biglaugh
Hi Ruby beer

Brother did offer it to me at the time - but it was just one too many at the time... wink

rubystone

11,254 posts

288 months

Saturday 22nd February 2014
quotequote all
Tango7 said:
Hi Ruby beer

Brother did offer it to me at the time - but it was just one too many at the time... wink
Never thought I'd see the phrase 'one too many' from you... smile

doclip

Original Poster:

349 posts

252 months

Saturday 22nd February 2014
quotequote all
I would imagine that with the passage of time its prob putting out circa 180 bhp ,which would be enough . HPCs seem t have held their value quite well -seems to be quite a decent bang for buck in terms of the overall package and power/weight ratio .
Does having the full cage add to the rigidity in terms of handling -quite nice to have for feeling of safety i would imagine ,although it does look a bit OTT for road use .
As i recall the VX block is quite heavy and it tends to understeer quite a bit ,which is ok for road use -i don't think id be going on the track -just for pottering around on sunny days .

TeflonTurd

1,670 posts

292 months

Saturday 22nd February 2014
quotequote all
A Swindon 235 only gave 206bhp due to the exhaust, inlet manifold, carbs and choke size not being to Caterham's spec. A 218 is essentially the same spec without any head porting. The 235 head was ported quite agressively.

Alan Carswell

14 posts

173 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
I have a 218 spec engine and I can confirm power was in low to mid 180's when I had it running on carbs, now it's on Throttle Bodies it is 195. My understanding is only physical changes inside the engine where cams, ARP bolts on the rods and that is it. All the other changes were to the carbs and the ignition. At least that is how it will have started out. I have been told that adding a dry sump would release more power but I have no direct evidence to support this.

doclip

Original Poster:

349 posts

252 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
thanks

doclip

Original Poster:

349 posts

252 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
So i would suspect in an older engine it's realistically going to be nearer to 160 bhp running on carbs
-without having it dynod its hard to know where you are really .
I cant really see how having a dry sump would change the power output .
I'm now actually thinking this example is rather over-priced although I guess that's the dealer margin factored in -ie its 2k over the mark IMHO cf a private sale .
From past experience with my VXE ,BDR ,Twincam and Xflow examples I probably need to put aside around 2-3K for a 7 of this vintage in terms of ongoing maintenance .
So i think on balance i'll give this a swerve -don't want to upset SWMBO after all with another money pit -been there done that too many times with 7s and TVRs ,tempting as it may be .
Also in terms of geography this isn't going to work -without knowing the dealer i would want to have it inspected on a ramp by a trusted oily ,not to mention driving it myself .


Alan Carswell

14 posts

173 months

Monday 24th February 2014
quotequote all
I doubt if it would be as low as you suggest, my car was nearly 20 years old with 30k on the clock when it showed 180+. See he quotes 210 have you asked why he says that because he may have documents to support that figure. It is not a number that matches any of the "standard' specs if there actually is such a thing as standard.
If I ignore spend on upgrades I have not spent anything like the number you suggest on maintenance.