London Communists to Liberate Comrades by Banning Cars
London Communists to Liberate Comrades by Banning Cars
Author
Discussion

NomduJour

Original Poster:

20,627 posts

288 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
Surprised this isn't getting more press - more insane anti-logic from the lunatics in City Hall.

Proposals completely fail to address the actual issue.

Bill

58,638 posts

284 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
Love the evenhanded thread title rofl

To be perfectly honest this makes much more sense than CO2 bks, as it's a local solution to a local (genuine) problem.

McWigglebum4th

32,414 posts

233 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
YES RESULT!!!!!!!!!!!

Non of our cars will be allowed into London

Another excuse not to visit the festering sthole

tannedstamina

510 posts

158 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
Eeeeek, I can't (and don't want to ) buy a new car!

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

262 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
Yup, a real solution to a real problem. They should be applauded for this one. Well, as long as they also clamping down on big diesel engines in e.g. buses, coaches, trucks which emit the most carcinogenic stuff.

AC43

13,614 posts

237 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
Banning belching clatterboxes from central London. About time too.


NomduJour

Original Poster:

20,627 posts

288 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
Seems glaringly obvious that if there are NOx and (supposed) particulate problems, the focus should be on what is actually causing those problems.


AC43

13,614 posts

237 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
NomduJour said:
Seems glaringly obvious that if thereare NOx and (supposed) particulate problems, the focus should be on what is actually causing those problems.
No, it's fine. Let's ban the diesels and the large pre-2005 petrols. I'm cool with that in my Feb 2005 E500. In fact I should really go and get an E55K to celebrate.

TurboHatchback

4,236 posts

182 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
Quality stuff, if this happened there we be a sudden glut of pre-05 petrol cars hitting the market which will knock prices right down. As I have zero intention of ever visiting London again voluntarily then this would be great for me!

NomduJour

Original Poster:

20,627 posts

288 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
AC43 said:
No, it's fine. Let's ban the diesels and the large pre-2005 petrols. I'm cool with that in my Feb 2005 E500. In fact I should really go and get an E55K to celebrate.
What if you had a 2004 E500?

It's a stupid and regressive policy.

Bill

58,638 posts

284 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
NomduJour said:
Seems glaringly obvious that if thereare NOx and (supposed) particulate problems, the focus should be on what is actually causing those problems.
The Autocr article doesn't look at non-car emissions, but that doesn't mean it isn't happening: http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/ULEZ%...

Central London is one of the few places you don't need to use a car, so it makes perfect sense to hit those hardest to allow time for buses and trucks to catch up. Not least because forcing the issue forwards with buses and trucks pushes prices up.

santona1937

871 posts

159 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
except it is not London COmmunists, unless Boris is a secret lefty.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

155 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
santona1937 said:
except it is not London COmmunists, unless Boris is a secret lefty.
S'wot I was thinking. Has nobody told the OP that Ken got voted out a few years back?

joema

2,754 posts

208 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
I wouldnt want to drive in London anyway. Leave the car at home. Easier.

NomduJour

Original Poster:

20,627 posts

288 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
Bill said:
Central London is one of the few places you don't need to use a car
Says who, and on whose authority? Why not ban domestic cookers in London to avoid house fires - that being fine because there are plenty of restaurants?

It's a poorly-conceived, poorly-considered plan which fails to address the supposed real problem. Just more unwelcome interference and restriction.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

217 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
The main issue here is that you force people who live in the zone and drive these vehciles talked about being banned to change their car in order to comply. What about taxi drivers etc?
This has the potential to price people off the roads.

Mind you, it does mean that plenty of people would have to replace the diesel with a petrol car. So not all bad biggrin

Devil2575

13,400 posts

217 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
joema said:
I wouldnt want to drive in London anyway. Leave the car at home. Easier.
My Brother in law lives in central London and he gave up his car years ago. He simply has no need for it.

kambites

71,466 posts

250 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
Why don't we just ban London? Everyone knows it'd be for the best really.

AC43

13,614 posts

237 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
NomduJour said:
AC43 said:
No, it's fine. Let's ban the diesels and the large pre-2005 petrols. I'm cool with that in my Feb 2005 E500. In fact I should really go and get an E55K to celebrate.
What if you had a 2004 E500?

It's a stupid and regressive policy.
It's Friday and I'm having a laugh. I happen to have bought a car which is slightly too old to attract the higher level of VED and slightly too young to get banned by the commies. Whilst the diesels get taken out and shot. Result.

JDMDrifter

4,063 posts

194 months

Friday 28th February 2014
quotequote all
Ermmmm what about all the diesel taxis? laugh