NIPed during Bank-Robbery Getaway
Discussion
I got a NIP last week in the post.
It just so happens at the time of the 'alleged offence' I had just robbed a bank, gunned down a security guard and was making my quick getaway.
In the course of the getaway, I mowed down half a dozen bright, popular and good-looking school children who, it is generally accepted by all who knew them, had great futures and were really nice.
The NIP said I was doing 38mph (due to my quick getaway you see) in a supposed 30 zone.
Now the Scammers and the Fixed Penalty Support Unit are not too concerned about the bank robbery or the deaths but want me to give them £60squids in exchange for 3 points on my licence.
Having checked up the recent ideas on NIP evasion on here I was wondering what the latest thinking was.
Is the ECJ "Weh v Austria (April 2004)" case which hints at the complulsion to provide information or face a penalty with regard to criminal cases as being illegal i.e. S172 request for information or face a penalty, still around or has it been debunked?
Is this case being followed up as part of the defence of the 8 cases which have recently had their applications for hearings accepted by the ECHR?
My current intentions are to provide no response to the NIP.
It just so happens at the time of the 'alleged offence' I had just robbed a bank, gunned down a security guard and was making my quick getaway.
In the course of the getaway, I mowed down half a dozen bright, popular and good-looking school children who, it is generally accepted by all who knew them, had great futures and were really nice.
The NIP said I was doing 38mph (due to my quick getaway you see) in a supposed 30 zone.
Now the Scammers and the Fixed Penalty Support Unit are not too concerned about the bank robbery or the deaths but want me to give them £60squids in exchange for 3 points on my licence.
Having checked up the recent ideas on NIP evasion on here I was wondering what the latest thinking was.
Is the ECJ "Weh v Austria (April 2004)" case which hints at the complulsion to provide information or face a penalty with regard to criminal cases as being illegal i.e. S172 request for information or face a penalty, still around or has it been debunked?
Is this case being followed up as part of the defence of the 8 cases which have recently had their applications for hearings accepted by the ECHR?
My current intentions are to provide no response to the NIP.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff