Police Interceptors tonight. Jim strikes again? A bit...
Police Interceptors tonight. Jim strikes again? A bit...
Author
Discussion

Sensibleboy

Original Poster:

1,168 posts

154 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
Anybody see the Astra undertake Jim tonight? What was Jim doing in lane 2 so far from the lorries on the inside lane?
Speed of the Astra was a little high of course but if Jim was in lane one then it wouldn't have happened. It takes two to perform an undertake.

MikeOxlong

3,114 posts

218 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
Yeah but he did get someone who shouldn't have been driving anyway.

DrDeAtH

3,699 posts

261 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
Didn't do him for the dodgy rear light though...

Baz Tench

5,648 posts

219 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
Oh dear, I'm going to hell. I'd better stop passing MLMs/OLMs on the left as it's 'illegal'. rolleyes

Ok, the guy in the Astra didn't do himself many favours, but the VoiceOver was as comical as ever.

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
indeed. 68mph in the outside lane with a clear inside lane for a good 300m. Ooops, back to driving school with you my son!

littlebasher

3,956 posts

200 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
Never mind Jim, what about the guy who put the back window in on the Beetle, after they'd pretty much dealt with the situation.

Seemed a bit OTT to me

rehab71

3,362 posts

219 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
Jim's a prick IMO

jimbop1

2,441 posts

233 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
Poor Jim. He has to cope with many people who dislike him just for being in the Police.

broken biscuit

1,633 posts

230 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
Jim's actually a legend. Known him for a few years. He's a petrolhead too. Most of them are petrolheads - I know of Type Rs, Leon Cupras, M3s, various M sport BMs and other tidy metal in their carpark. If you had to listen to the same old crap excuses every day, I think you would get bored of listening to them.

Actus Reus

4,312 posts

184 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
littlebasher said:
Never mind Jim, what about the guy who put the back window in on the Beetle, after they'd pretty much dealt with the situation.

Seemed a bit OTT to me
Me too - was that car TWOC'd? If so, the owner was probably a bit pissed off to see one of Jim's mates smash the rear screen for no reason whatsoever.

broken biscuit

1,633 posts

230 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
In the commentary, it said it was 5 up, and a passenger was done for aggravated TWOC. I don't think that they were sat there quiet as church mice. They had every chance to open the doors when it stopped, but sat there until the driver had nowhere to go. Better the windows go in than someone is hurt. Cops on scene don't know what the intentions of passengers are / if armed etc, so the windows going in is a distraction technique.

Actus Reus

4,312 posts

184 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
Fair enough I guess, but only a 2 door so don't think rear passengers were going far very fast. Heat of the moment though I guess.

V8forweekends

2,501 posts

153 months

Monday 10th March 2014
quotequote all
Respect to the bloke in the red BMW who did a better job than the coppers blocking in the Beetle - he must've seen how reckless the geezer was but weighed in anyway - good stuff.

A polish Diesel thief and a Macedonian truck driver who thinks reading a map whilst driving is fine........

carinaman

25,134 posts

201 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
broken biscuit said:
Jim's actually a legend. Known him for a few years. He's a petrolhead too. Most of them are petrolheads - I know of Type Rs, Leon Cupras, M3s, various M sport BMs and other tidy metal in their carpark. If you had to listen to the same old crap excuses every day, I think you would get bored of listening to them.
I've had three current or former Police Driving Instructors take me for IAM or RoSPA tests. The officer that took me for my IAM test compared my drive to the RoSPA grade I could have expected to have achieved for the drive. I am pretty sure he's dead now. Him mentioning the RoSPA test is why I took the RoSPA test after a few years.

So if you have police officers arguing the toss on the hard shoulder about how they've done a 4 week course, do you think that may undermine the credibility of the Police Driving Instructors that assess me on my RoSPA drive?

The RoSPA material used to say a Gold pass was the nearest qualification a Civilian could gain comparable to a Police Class 1 driver or something. Such a comparison or statement may be somewhat devalued if the guy is putting himself into gaps that could obviously disappear at the end of a slip road in a hurry to get to a routine stop for a coach or bus or to act up for the sake of the TV crew. People play up to cameras, even police officers.

If they drive like muppets, and then pull rank with their '4 week course' are they really qualified to assess how anybody else is driving?

'Do as I say, not as I do.....

We've all heard that before too haven't we?


Edited by carinaman on Thursday 24th April 23:11