CLK 2,7L CDi 2003 to 2005 what to be alert of?
CLK 2,7L CDi 2003 to 2005 what to be alert of?
Author
Discussion

uk_vette

Original Poster:

3,336 posts

228 months

Tuesday 11th March 2014
quotequote all
I have this mysterious craving for a Mercedes CLK 270cdi.
The 2 door pillarless coupe.

Nothing new, and my price max is £4500

This gives me a good selection of 2003 and a few "05" 2005 vehicles.
Almost all seem to have between 100k miles and 130k miles.
Should I consider higher mileage CLK's (190k miles) providing they have full MB history?

My first thought was the history of MB and their paint and rust issues of the early 2000 year vehicles, and how it was a real black mark, against the quality of MB.

Was it particular vehicle models involved, or did it include all MB vehicles of that era?

Almost all of them seem to me auto.
I am not fussed, auto or manual, I like them both.

What should I look out for?

What are the signs of abuse, is there any for a MB ?

vette


dalenorth

930 posts

191 months

Tuesday 11th March 2014
quotequote all
Firstly whatever you do, don't buy a Manual. They are nasty to say the least.

Also watch out for rust on the rear arches.

uk_vette

Original Poster:

3,336 posts

228 months

Tuesday 11th March 2014
quotequote all
To be honest, I would actually go for the auto.

Do you know from what year/month did they get the galv. body?

vette

Aidayboy

392 posts

227 months

Thursday 13th March 2014
quotequote all
I have an E270CDI, 2005, and touch wood the engines been fairly bullet proof, it only has 80k on it, my only bit of advice would be to let it warm up before driving a little, when you start them first thing they are like a tractor but once they warm up they are great. My E Class has been bad for springs and front end bushes and ball joints but it's a great car with an old but strong engine.

If your near Glasgow your more than welcome to have a go.