Lightweight, quick, reliable and cheap: possible???
Lightweight, quick, reliable and cheap: possible???
Author
Discussion

Richie200

Original Poster:

2,013 posts

238 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
I currently have a 911 for summer, an RX7 for track and a little K11 Micra for the winter. I want to replace the Micra with something a little more interesting along the lines of:

0-60 in <7sec
>40MPG
Lightweight
40+MPG <£5000
Reliable

Any guidance much appreciatedsmile

Defcon5

6,465 posts

220 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
Hmmm if you could stretch the budget a bit a cat repaired VX220 might be doable

stargazer30

1,720 posts

195 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
Pity about the winter use and sub 7 sec 0-60. I would have said MK3 MR2, but they are nippy rather than hot hatch quick and they don't like snow much. Loads of fun and dirt cheap to buy and run though.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

275 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
The recently discontinued Mercedes A-class ain't sexy but it would be head and shoulders above a Micra. Available with a big enough petrol engine to get it moving along the road, whilst light and economical. Used prices look a bit of a bargain.

BBS-LM

3,978 posts

253 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
Clio 172 182

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

246 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
Get an old C1 or 107, whack a turbo or bike engine in it, and leave it looking standard. Have fun.

otolith

68,614 posts

233 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
Small old hot hatches? Might have to compromise on the 0-60 time. What was that company that used to tune and refurbish 205GTIs?

LordHaveMurci

12,336 posts

198 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
BBS-LM said:
Clio 172 182
Beat me to it. I have a 172 Cup & a 996 C2, light, quick(ish), economical & mine has been reliable. Great fun too smile

LordHaveMurci

12,336 posts

198 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
BBS-LM said:
Clio 172 182
Beat me to it. I have a 172 Cup & a 996 C2, light, quick(ish), economical & mine has been reliable. Great fun too smile

5lab

1,906 posts

225 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
mk3 mr2 with the celica 180bhp engine swap?

in fact the celica is no heavyweight, 1200kg which is probably not much different from a clio 182.

924 turbo *might* be reliable smile what about a boxster?

santona1937

871 posts

159 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
mk2 mr2 especially the turbo version. 0-60 sub 7 seconds, japanese reliability, mid engine RWD. top speed about 150. pick a minter up for around 4k

Buff Mchugelarge

3,316 posts

179 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
Interesting this one.

I think the 0-60 and 40+mpg together will be the hardest criteria to find in budget.
Another vote for a Clio from me smile

stupidbutkeen

1,025 posts

184 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
hows about a fiat coupe turbo?

Tickle

6,447 posts

233 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
Toyota Starlet Glanza Turbo things,

Never drove one but seen a few take off, they certainly look quick.

A few all under 4k on here for sale

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/t...

Truckosaurus

13,250 posts

313 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
A diesel BMW 1-series with the boost turned up, running on skinny eco tyres for maximum slidiness.

Or a 130i if you are willing to lose a bit of economy.

rallycross

13,749 posts

266 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
Lupo Gti is surprisingly fun to hustle along B roads but also fine for 2 people on a blast down the motorway, was not convinced until I drove one - then it made sense.

Escy

4,129 posts

178 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
A Civic EK9 Type R should meet all of those criteria

Matt UK

18,084 posts

229 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
An R53 Mini Cooper S will get close.

Fantuzzi

3,297 posts

175 months

Sunday 16th March 2014
quotequote all
stargazer30 said:
Pity about the winter use and sub 7 sec 0-60. I would have said MK3 MR2, but they are nippy rather than hot hatch quick and they don't like snow much. Loads of fun and dirt cheap to buy and run though.
Well most owners seem to find they sit around the 7 mark (evo tested one at 7.2-which I think is good representation of the speed', on crap tires, bad start, and a fat brother on board 7.6 was achieved.

I'm sure if some yoko ado8s or the like were on the car you might get close to 6.9 with a perfect start but it isn't really about that with the mr2,what with only 140bhp/tonne.

But the MR2 is a rather good call, pick a good un up for just under 3k, really good drivers car, great feel, great chassis, I get 45mpg sat at 65 on the motorway, not much room inside though...