Vote on speed limit reductions - M Keynes
Vote on speed limit reductions - M Keynes
Author
Discussion

catso

Original Poster:

16,424 posts

296 months

Wednesday 24th November 2004
quotequote all

rviant

1,284 posts

282 months

Wednesday 24th November 2004
quotequote all
94% say no surprise suprise

simonrockman

7,119 posts

284 months

Wednesday 24th November 2004
quotequote all
Oh no, the green lobby will find it and they are much more organised at tipping this kind of vote that ordinary motorists. They should ask for your postcode before voting and make sure people ar MK residents.

TheLemming

4,319 posts

294 months

Wednesday 24th November 2004
quotequote all
Arrrgh this whole debate is retarded... I live in Leighton Buzzard, but work / socialise / drink / shop in Milton Keynes - so I'm probably there more than I'm at home.

The grid roads are NSL dual carriageways, with a few NSL singles on less heavily used routes.

Once you turn off, or enter a residential or business district, your in a 30 or 40 limit.

It works brilliantly, it was designed that way...

So why the HELL do they want to cut the limits?

Because some drunk idiot staggers out onto a dual carriageway instead of using an underpass? Or a kid with no common sense and the same amount of parental care and education does the same?

Pigeon

18,535 posts

275 months

Wednesday 24th November 2004
quotequote all
simonrockman said:
Oh no, the green lobby will find it and they are much more organised at tipping this kind of vote that ordinary motorists.

They have. I've just voted ("no", of course) and the next page told me "50% Yes, 50% No"... with a link to a "Results" page which showed "49% Yes, 50% No" (huh?)

(IME not that many people exceed 60mph on the duals anyway...)

GreenV8S

31,017 posts

313 months

Wednesday 24th November 2004
quotequote all
Astonishing that nearly 50% say yes. There's no earthly reason for it. If I remember right the last big campaign featured a local granny demanding lower speed limits and more cameras after a drunk joy rider went off the road at some stupid speed. Yeah, that'll help.

simonrockman

7,119 posts

284 months

Thursday 25th November 2004
quotequote all
TheLemming said:
It works brilliantly, it was designed that way...

So why the HELL do they want to cut the limits?

Because some drunk idiot staggers out onto a dual carriageway instead of using an underpass? Or a kid with no common sense and the same amount of parental care and education does the same?



No, it's so that they can put up some cameras and make some money.

TheLemming

4,319 posts

294 months

Thursday 25th November 2004
quotequote all
simonrockman said:

TheLemming said:
It works brilliantly, it was designed that way...

So why the HELL do they want to cut the limits?

Because some drunk idiot staggers out onto a dual carriageway instead of using an underpass? Or a kid with no common sense and the same amount of parental care and education does the same?




No, it's so that they can put up some cameras and make some money.


Sorry Simon, it was more of a rant than a question... :P

I'm fully aware of the politics and doctrine behind these people.

bigtone

1,211 posts

313 months

Friday 26th November 2004
quotequote all
As an interesting follow up to this in their poll archive:

"Should the V7 in Milton Keynes have a 30mph limit applied to it"

Results:

80% No, it's a wide road with no houses built along it, 60mph is the right speed for this road.

19% Yes. all the single carriageways in Milton Keynes should be 30mph. Speed Kills.

turbobloke

117,176 posts

289 months

Sunday 28th November 2004
quotequote all
Seen this?not sure if posted before, interesting read. Consultation, foregone conclusion, spin city?

'King Deadly

196 posts

266 months

Sunday 28th November 2004
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Seen this?not sure if posted before, interesting read. Consultation, foregone conclusion, spin city?


Blanket 20mph speed reduction?

Jeez, you might as well get out and walk. Maybe that's the idea.