2007 BMW Z4 2.0i Sport vs 2007 Focus ST-2 2.5
2007 BMW Z4 2.0i Sport vs 2007 Focus ST-2 2.5
Author
Discussion

HumanDoing

Original Poster:

540 posts

155 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Hi all,

My circumstances have recently changed so now I will (gleefully) have more cash on the hip and a 10 mile daily commute rather than my current 80 mile daily commute. My priorities have therefore changed from a functional, economical, dependable car to something that's the dogs orbs in terms of fun.

£8.5k buys me a 2007 BMW Z4 2.0i Sport or a 2007 Focus ST-2 2.5. Both around 7 years old, both 60,000 miles on the clock. I doubt I'll put 5,000 miles a year on what I buy and couldn't give a monkeys about fuel or ownership costs (unless one or the other has monstrously higher general repair bills.) The ST is faster but the BMW has more chic and is the BMW ... may I please ask for people's opinion on which to plump for? Or is it too chalk and cheese to compare?

steve_bmw

1,591 posts

204 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Z4 all day long if you don't need 4 seats.
Get a 6 cylinder engine though, sounds beautiful.

Kong

1,503 posts

200 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
HumanDoing said:
My priorities have therefore changed from a functional, economical, dependable car to something that's the dogs orbs in terms of fun.
So you're looking at a Ford focus or a 4 cylinder BMW? At least go for the 3.0i version!

pti

1,856 posts

173 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Definitely the Focus over the 2.0 Z4.

3.0 and you're asking a different question.

MoelyCrio

2,502 posts

211 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
The 2.0 Z4 is pants.
Your budget gets you a higher mileage 3.0, or even a 3.0si with the 265bhp engine. The 6 cyclinder engines are absolutely lovely.

Boobonman

5,700 posts

221 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Very arbitrary age and mileage requirements, loosen up on those and open up a whole world of opportunity.

p1tse

1,412 posts

221 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
steve_bmw said:
Z4 all day long if you don't need 4 seats.
Get a 6 cylinder engine though, sounds beautiful.
Second that

hornetrider

63,161 posts

234 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Boobonman said:
Very arbitrary age and mileage requirements, loosen up on those and open up a whole world of opportunity.
yes

Ecosseven

2,364 posts

246 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
p1tse said:
steve_bmw said:
Z4 all day long if you don't need 4 seats.
Get a 6 cylinder engine though, sounds beautiful.
Second that
Definitely the Z4 although I would try and stretch to the 2.5 if you can.

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
If you can't get a Z4 with 6 cylinders, don't get a Z4!

If 4 cylinders is all you can get within your requirements, well...



£8500 buys a 2006 with 60000 miles.

Boobonman

5,700 posts

221 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Your budget would buy a beautiful M5 of the best flavour.

Axionknight

8,505 posts

164 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
RenOHH said:
If you can't get a Z4 with 6 cylinders, don't get a Z4!

If 4 cylinders is all you can get within your requirements, well...



£8500 buys a 2006 with 60000 miles.
This guy knows.

lamboman100

1,445 posts

150 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Honda S2000 or Nissan 350Z or Renault R26.

jamiehill01

6 posts

175 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
I can vouch as i have had both that i would rather the st any day as its so much more rounded car then the z4. i am also in the stage of selling my 08 st3 for just a little bit over your 8.5k budget. the st3 is much nicer interior then the st2 albeit the only difference is leather seats (heated) etc. They are both great cars but i would have the st over the z4.

BlitzE34

284 posts

179 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
The 2.0 Z4 is a decent driving car but I would avoid as it has the dreaded N46 engine.

tali1

5,286 posts

230 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
2.0 Z4 is just a tad too hairdressy !
biggrin

HumanDoing

Original Poster:

540 posts

155 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
Thanks for your advice guys. I had also thought about the S2000 ... there's one nearby for £7,000, 10 years old 80,000 miles ... I just don't want to get suckered in to paying less for something that's about to conk out and will cause headaches and diddle my wallet, hence the idea of going for something well short of 100,000.

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
HumanDoing said:
Thanks for your advice guys. I had also thought about the S2000 ... there's one nearby for £7,000, 10 years old 80,000 miles ... I just don't want to get suckered in to paying less for something that's about to conk out and will cause headaches and diddle my wallet, hence the idea of going for something well short of 100,000.
80000 is okay as long as it's been serviced annually to the proper schedule. Surprised at that price, that is possibly more than they were 12 months ago. I bought my 2005 with 53000 miles for £7300 in August last year while it was still hot and sunny.

Boobonman

5,700 posts

221 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
HumanDoing said:
Thanks for your advice guys. I had also thought about the S2000 ... there's one nearby for £7,000, 10 years old 80,000 miles ... I just don't want to get suckered in to paying less for something that's about to conk out and will cause headaches and diddle my wallet, hence the idea of going for something well short of 100,000.
Seriously, lose the mileage objections. They are so meaningless I can't even tell you.

Axionknight

8,505 posts

164 months

Wednesday 26th March 2014
quotequote all
HumanDoing said:
Thanks for your advice guys. I had also thought about the S2000 ... there's one nearby for £7,000, 10 years old 80,000 miles ... I just don't want to get suckered in to paying less for something that's about to conk out and will cause headaches and diddle my wallet, hence the idea of going for something well short of 100,000.
It's a Honda.....