Honda Civic 2006-2011
Author
Discussion

Challo

Original Poster:

12,693 posts

184 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
My GF's sister is going to look at Honda's Civics tomorrow and I said I would come along to give her a hand. She is looking at 1.8 Petrol version with these 2 below in particular:

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2014...

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2014...

The issue is I know nothing about them and a quick search on here results in the FN2 Type R version. Anybody own one that can give some guidance?

Challo

Original Poster:

12,693 posts

184 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
Monty Python said:
Thanks I forgot about Honest John.

Calletrece

320 posts

159 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
The only guidance I can offer is that the interior is the best of pretty much any car on the market.

Lovely stuff.

sjg

7,675 posts

294 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
civinfo.com for specifics.

I'd take a 5 door over 3, there's no "memory" on the 3-door front seats so they won't return to the same spot after letting someone in the back. The rear doors are very well hidden anyway.

Rear suspension is a bit harsh, rear visibility is poor so parking sensors are nice to have (or budget for aftermarket).

I really liked mine, interior is great and there was an incredible amount of space inside for the size of car.

jackh707

2,132 posts

185 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
Great cars. 2.2diesel is the one to go for. Interior is huge and comfy, well specced, cavernous boot.

themanwithnoname

1,634 posts

242 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
I can only really comment in relation to the Type-R but I've driven a couple of the non R ones, they are well screwed together, comfortable, efficient and quiet.

A lot of car for your money.

ecsrobin

18,655 posts

194 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
I own a 1.8 TypeS the QE2 has a better turning circle and I hate parking the thing (wish I'd got parking sensors) quite a bad blind spot on it too. But I have fun in it and everyone always comments on the dashboard and interior.

As others have said the 2.2 diesel is the version to get, the front seats not having memory is a pain in the arse and the key not folding annoys me. I also found out this week when the battery in the remote died that the only way to turn the alarm off is with the remote???????

A plus side is it has a very large boot and when the rear seats are folded they go flat, the cigarette charger however is in a stupid place if you want a standalone sat nav connected. I do get around 44mpg plodding about and have got 51mpg when I got bored and wanted to see if Hondas claim was true. It was.

Would I buy another civic? No

Do I regret buying the civic? At the time it fitted the bill for what I needed but now I wish I'd gone for speed instead of good space and MPG so on the edge.

Just a note on the TypeS she's looking at that is a low spec (non GT) one, with no fog lights, dual zone climate control, panoramic roof and probably a couple more additions, so the price seems slightly high to me.

Spitfire2

1,968 posts

215 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
Calletrece said:
The only guidance I can offer is that the interior is the best of pretty much any car on the market.

Lovely stuff.
Really - I thought the interior of the one I had was rubbish. Interesting at first but the piano black was difficult to keep nice and the material used on the doors quickly lost its 'pile'

Spitfire2

1,968 posts

215 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
Clutches on the earlier diesels were a bit of a scandal with loads developing slip symptoms and Honda garages pretending there was nothing wrong and resisting warranty claims

conkerman

3,513 posts

164 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
Tried a couple of these (2.2 Diesel) and each one felt like the rear axle was broken. If the crash bang wallop was removed I would have bought one of rme and the Mrs.

Prince Rupert

430 posts

234 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
I ran one a 2.2 diesel se as a company car for a couple of years. Good cars overall. Interior huge, well specified, comfy, look good, individual and in 2.2 diesel form felt quite quick (more so then the numbers would suggest). However the ride is crashy, the engine noisy and agricultural sounding and interior not all that well put together. Also the bar across the back gets in the way of the view from the rear view mirror (parking not a problem through).

Edit - remembered, also quite low slung at the front so can be easily caught out by speed cushions and humps.

BGarside

1,568 posts

166 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
I've read on a couple of road tests that the 1.8 petrol is short of torque and needs revving hard to access the performance (which is pretty good for a 1.8).

Diesel comments are not relevant here as the OP is asking for comments on the 1.8 petrol.

Challo

Original Poster:

12,693 posts

184 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
Thanks for your comments. On speaking with her this afternoon I think she is aiming more towards a 5door version, and coming from a Aygo she is not fussed on it being the sporty version.

I wasn't sure on the differences on the different specs so will do another look on the autotrader and see what EX models are around to increase the options.

minky monkey

1,566 posts

195 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
We've always had Hondas in the family, and had a later civic as a loan car. Really didn't like it due to the rear visibility. It's probably something you'd get used to. Shame, I really wanted to like it, but couldn't wait to return it to the dealer.

LHRFlightman

2,249 posts

199 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
We own a 1.8 ES with the panoramic sunroof. Interior is lovely, lights up light the bridge of the Starship Enterprise. I can get 50mpg on a motorway run but the engine is low on torque so needs to be reved. Its spins up smoothly so its a reasonably pleasurable experience.

Parkign sensors would be good to have, the rear 3/4 visibility is poor, and the bar across the rear windowm might annoy you. It doesnt bother me though.

The rear windown really needs a wiper, and when you open the tailgate after rain water runs down the channels and you can get wet!

Would i have another? Absolutley.

Legend83

10,572 posts

251 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
Had our Civic 2.2 CDTI SE for 4 years now. It's a reliable work-horse with a spacious and futuristic interior. The ride is very harsh and the engine (although excellent) is tractor-like.

The rain water down the boot lid is annoying! I don't mind the rear windscreen bar though as it tends to help block out bright 4x4 xenons on a dark wet night.

Only issues we have had are an ABS sensor needed replacing and the auto-wipers have started having a mind of their own.

An extremely practical and solid car.

Boring as hell - will be getting a 6 series soon hopefully!

richatnort

3,204 posts

160 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
Op, they seem a bit steep in price! Mines a 57 plate with only 32k on it with everything but fog lights and cruise control and I was going to sell my for 6k.

Challo

Original Poster:

12,693 posts

184 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
richatnort said:
Op, they seem a bit steep in price! Mines a 57 plate with only 32k on it with everything but fog lights and cruise control and I was going to sell my for 6k.
Thanks. I think that Type S is over priced but wasn't sure on the Sport model. Im going to have a look tonight and find some more cars for her to have a look at over the weekend and go from there.

I think they where the initial ones she found and liked but will check again.

richatnort

3,204 posts

160 months

Friday 28th March 2014
quotequote all
Are you just looking down south or nationwide?

I have to agree with everyone else too! It is a great car but don't expect to get more then 35mpg around town and 40s on a motorway trip?