Front Numberplates
Author
Discussion

cuda

Original Poster:

470 posts

269 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Running without one on my car - what is the law now and what can the plod do if they stop you?

Garlick

40,601 posts

269 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
I heard that having a scuffed one in the boot was the way forward 'it just fell off, would you believe it' etc

Have you removed it for aesthetics?

Jim AK

4,029 posts

153 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Fixed penalty (£60?) & producer thing to prove you got it fixed. IIRC

Steffan

10,362 posts

257 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
There have been many topics on this on PH. It is illegal but if you are happy to break the law that is your choice. The police do stop drivers ans issue offence documentation. Up to each driver not good in my view. The danger of "it fell off I've got it in the boot " made up story is that you are then in danger of breaking the more serious laws of obstruction etc etc and may well end up in real trouble. It would not be difficult to prove the lie is you get stopped three or four times and the police have been known to do this. I like a quiet life within the context of owning many cars some of which are on the very edge on the road so I personally avoid this additional risk.

jayemm89

4,464 posts

159 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Yes, as others have said, unless you happen to have a car where it is either very difficult or impractical to fit one on the front, don't really see the risk.

Of all things to get fined for, numberplates seems a silly one.

Personally when I see a car without a front number plate, I tend to assume it is one of the american forces members, lots around me and they tend to not put plates on.

eybic

9,212 posts

203 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
A lot of the ANPR cameras spy you from the front now so I would guess they'll be quite hot on it.

Steffan

10,362 posts

257 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
eybic said:
A lot of the ANPR cameras spy you from the front now so I would guess they'll be quite hot on it.
Given the volume of traffic on the road it seems entirely reasonable to me to require statutory forms of identification to enable identification of the car and therefore the driver. If you miss off one plate why not miss off both? You presumably could argue that both fell off.

The real problem here is that in a crowded country with many millions of cars and drivers on the road identification is critical to justice in the event of an accident. That is the reason for front and rear plates in the proscribed formats and I cannot see how this cannot be other than entirely sensible. Individuals can try to suggest that they are above such things but not in the eyes of the law. I would suggest that this is perfectly reasonable on the grounds of safety and administration of justice alone.

Krikkit

27,938 posts

210 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Steffan said:
eybic said:
A lot of the ANPR cameras spy you from the front now so I would guess they'll be quite hot on it.
Given the volume of traffic on the road it seems entirely reasonable to me to require statutory forms of identification to enable identification of the car and therefore the driver. If you miss off one plate why not miss off both? You presumably could argue that both fell off.
Agree there. Stick-on (technically still an offence, but get a reflective one and they're reasonable imo), square or tiny ones with custom brackets aren't hard to fix somewhere.

Vipers

33,501 posts

257 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
I have always found it odd that bikes do not need a front plate, I am well aware of the reason, but if they don't need one, why do cars need one?




smile

Garlick

40,601 posts

269 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
If you have a modern supercar you seem to be automatically exempt

cuda

Original Poster:

470 posts

269 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Interesting thoughts - thanks guys. Not quite a supercar Garlick, but think looks better wihtout it...


Krikkit

27,938 posts

210 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Not sure on that, it's a bit black to my eyes!

vtecyo

2,122 posts

158 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Stop being a scene queen and put it on.

anonymous-user

83 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Caterham plate was ripped off by a speed bump so I kept in the passenger side. Forgot to take the screws out though and after a beer run plonked the bag down and psssssssssssssst beer everywhere biggrin Took the NSX plate off as well, it was a hideous thing and ruined the front of the car. Luckily I never had any grief, whether this was the attitude of everyone towards these particular cars or not I don't know? I can imagine they will tighten up on this though as there are so many cameras etc

jmflare

413 posts

170 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
I've ran without one on my car for ages and had no issues, don't think the police are that bothered. I've put it back on now though as i decided it looks better with one.

carreauchompeur

18,318 posts

233 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Not sure on that, it's a bit black to my eyes!
Less of the casual racism here please.

Zod

35,295 posts

287 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
I have a 3/4 size one. I was stopped once, told the Officer that a full sized one impeded airflow, he agreed and sent me on my way.