1st gen tech - is it ever good enough?
Discussion
I was thinking about this reading the ABS thread.
1st gen ABS (single/dual channel) was pretty s
t. Gave me a few brown trouser moments.
1st gen double clutch autos / automated manuals have a pretty bad rep in auto mode around town.
Early (Lucas) EFI.
Traction control.
Electric PAS.
Drive by wire throttles.
All of these have improved significantly with later generations, but were they "good enough" when first released?
Was any major new technology?
1st gen ABS (single/dual channel) was pretty s
t. Gave me a few brown trouser moments.1st gen double clutch autos / automated manuals have a pretty bad rep in auto mode around town.
Early (Lucas) EFI.
Traction control.
Electric PAS.
Drive by wire throttles.
All of these have improved significantly with later generations, but were they "good enough" when first released?
Was any major new technology?
I think EFI was pretty good from day one, if you ignore the Lucas issue, which I believe came down to a badly designed fuel pump only.
I don't expect perfection from day one, of course not, but some technologies are seriously underdone when launched.
Electric windows as mentioned above were ok, also electric mirrors, wipers, washers. Loads of useful minor stuff - I don't really know where I'm going with this...
I don't expect perfection from day one, of course not, but some technologies are seriously underdone when launched.
Electric windows as mentioned above were ok, also electric mirrors, wipers, washers. Loads of useful minor stuff - I don't really know where I'm going with this...
1st gen. could be better, if it was more thoroughly engineered to prevent embarassing issues for manufacturers, as opposed to cost-reduced later on when such things become routine fitments?
Also, such things may originally have been premium-priced luxury options rather than being seen as basic requirements fitted to all cars, so there may have been more cash available to spend designing / building such technology originally. E.g: Look at the cost of specifying aircon or ABS on a 1980s Mercedes.
My father has a first-generation Flymo which is still working after some 40-odd years. The newer stuff appears to be cheap carp in comparison.
Compare also the quality of construction of early radios, TVs, etc...
Also, such things may originally have been premium-priced luxury options rather than being seen as basic requirements fitted to all cars, so there may have been more cash available to spend designing / building such technology originally. E.g: Look at the cost of specifying aircon or ABS on a 1980s Mercedes.
My father has a first-generation Flymo which is still working after some 40-odd years. The newer stuff appears to be cheap carp in comparison.
Compare also the quality of construction of early radios, TVs, etc...
McWigglebum4th said:
I would say Mk1 insight
100Mpg and weighs zilch
Still not bettered
Mk1 Citroen AX Diesel. 100mpg, weighs less and has more seats. Also it was first.100Mpg and weighs zilch
Still not bettered
Admittedly it does that without resorting to any clever new technology, but that doesn't make the Insight "better", just much more expensive to manufacture.
Although as a "1st gen" hybrid it works very well and is certainly good enough.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


