Mercedes C63 AMG Edition 507: PH Fleet
Let's put that fuel consumption issue to bed once and for all

Of COURSE it's thirsty. There's a pretty obvious '6.3' badge on the side of it so it's not like they didn't warn you.
What's emerged though is that on a cruise it's consistently thirsty, by which I mean fuel consumption hovers around the low 20s however you drive it. I've driven to Wales and back at a 'steady motorway cruise' with mountain bikes on the roof and got around 21mpg. I do the stop-start 40-mile M25 commute and get 22ish. I've had to crawl along in the slow lane having been caught out by the reserve light coming on seconds after the needle drops below the quarter tank mark and got 24mpg. And on the way to Sunday Service the other day I was at a cruise-controlled 55mph waiting for a mate to catch me up on the M25 for about 10 miles and just scraped 25.
So basically it doesn't make much difference whether you're mincing or mashing the throttle. I'm rather pleased with this discovery. Mainly because it means there's naff all incentive for trying to drive slowly to save fuel. PHer and C63 owner Grant Hibbett would seem to agree, Tweeting "I find there's only 2-3mpg in bumbling along versus, erm, making progress" when I mentioned as much online.
Of course, start properly pressing on and the 507 will slurp down fuel in quarter-tank gulps. But if you're driving it like that you'll have more pressing concerns. Like 'is half a tank enough to do the next 10 miles?' or 'how long before they set up a road block?' Pays your money, etc.
Gripes thus far are few but include seats that don't go low enough, tyre roar that intrudes on otherwise peaceful cruising, the slightly off-set wheel and ... no, that's about it really. Oh, and I did set off one morning only to get a strident warning from the tyre pressure sensor. A lack of change meant I couldn't top it up at any of the air lines I passed, denial and self righteous rage seeing me bumble along the M25 until I found a Sainsbury's with a free to use air line. Mercedes Brentwood replaced the tyre on the press fleet account, the Conti Sport Contact 2 a burly £254 fitted if I'd been paying. So I'm glad I wasn't.
Meanwhile there are many things I love about this car but I've got six months to bore you with them so I'll conclude with this. Is there any other stat about your car even the automotively illiterate can appreciate beyond engine capacity? Most non-car folk couldn't honestly tell you whether 400hp is significantly better than 100 but engine size is so deeply engrained in motoring hierarchy you'll ALWAYS be able to get a response with this single Top Trumps stat.
I love it. I parked up next to a builder the other day and he wandered over and said 'What's that got in it, mate?' I told him. 'Get out of it. 6.2 litres? In that? No, you're having me on...' It never fails to tickle me. In a modern context it IS a truly outrageous number that goes beyond the wow factor of the performance or noise it makes. People look genuinely shocked that a grey Mercedes estate can pack so much heat.
You'll have read about the SLS Final Edition we've just driven; that 'my' family estate car with room for bikes, baby clobber and the rest has fundamentally the same engine under the bonnet is just magnificent. It's a properly special car this one, a sense that's only growing with every mile that passes. Along with a sense of inevitability that at some point hence I will put my own money into one.
FACT SHEET
Car: 2013 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG Edition 507
Run by: Dan
On fleet since: March 2014
Mileage: 9,251
List price new: £68,470 before options (£80,075 as tested, comprising Privacy Glass £330, reversing camera £390, Lighting Package £150, three-zone climate control £590, Keyless Go £665, AMG Performance Media £2,040, Comand Online with six-disc changer £250, DAB £335, Harmon Kardon surround sound £650, phone pre-wiring with roof aerial £290, Designo Magno Platinum paint £3,660, rear axle limited-slip differential £1,745 and 19-inch wheels £510)
Last month at a glance: Lots of miles (some of them sideways) and fuel later grin isn't subsiding
Previous reports:
C63 arrives, Dan hasn't let anyone else have a go since
A little corporate propaganda about the engine for your viewing pleasure...
Photos (MB World): Dave Smith
Ok, so it's not quite the same as a 6.2 litre engine in a family wagon, but the main response i get from people about the Celica is:
"8000rpm in a 1.8?"
Still surprises people that one, especially when I have a beaming grin on my face when i tell them!

Glad to hear you're enjoying the Merc. I've seen a few around lately and the noise alone makes me smile.
I agree the seat could do with going lower, also mine seem to be showing quite a bit of bolster wear only after 3600 miles.
Growing up in the 70s and 80s, the attainable bog standard was 1.6l or 2.0l. I got hugely overexcited in 1980 when my Dad bought a Saab 900 turbo... Apart from 'American Cars' which had mythical 7.0l engines, the exotica had 4.4l flat 12s or 5.2l V12s.
We really do live in a golden age: 6.2l in a little estate car. AND its only got 8 cylinders: imagine how vast they are! I used to be bewildered by the idea of the Porsche 944S with its 3.0l 4 cyl engine but the Merc's pots are even bigger.
Thinking about the cars I've owned, the only two that have/had a really impressive number are:
Honda S2000 - 9,000rpm
Volvo XC90 - in financial terms the biggest single export Sweden has ever produced (not at all PH, I know)
I justify my fuel cost by only using the car on weekends and the odd evening, as I am part of the rat race every day on the Central line.
Either way it's a small price to pay for such an exhilarating car, though the wife disagrees (but she's an Accountant so she would)

Don't ever buy tyres from a Main Dealer - Conti Sport Contact 5's are only £172 fitted per corner from other suppliers (eg F1 Autocentres).
Agree with the MPG findings - simple answer - just enjoy the car and have fun 'cos the end MPG result isn't significant enough to worry about

Worth every penny at the pump though, as each time I turn the key it puts a huge grin on my face and everyone around me - except from my wife when I wake our sleeping baby!!
I do wish the tank was slightly larger, as I really feel the need to keep an eagle eye on the fuel gauge. It's no exaggeration to say that after a serious 'blast' to the next town and back can easily see the needle plunge by a qtr. It's safe to say I'm a regular at the local petrol station!
P
I justify my fuel cost by only using the car on weekends and the odd evening, as I am part of the rat race every day on the Central line.
Either way it's a small price to pay for such an exhilarating car, though the wife disagrees (but she's an Accountant so she would)

http://www.honestjg.com/2013/12/c63-amg-ppp-first-...
http://www.honestjg.com/2013/01/c63-amg-second-imp...

No? Just me then!
Besides, if the bikes are on and off frequently it's either a two-person job to lift the assembled bars/carriers off assembled (assuming you have somewhere big enough to store them all made up), or you have to dismantle the whole lot then measure and refit the next time you're using them - PITA.
If it's going to be less than a week until I'm using mine again I'll probably just leave them on.
Anyway, C63s of wherever variety are simply epic. The 2024 PH hero article is probably already written.
Compared to a hum-drum C220 CDI estate (currently averaging about 38MPG over 24,000 miles according to OBC), the extra cost in fuel to run a C63 507 at ~12k miles p.a. is only about £125 a month.
Tyres on the AMG-trimmed cooking models are almost as expensive too, so not much saving there.
Small price to pay to avoid a grotty 4-cyl diesel I would say!
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






