RE: Mercedes C63 AMG Edition 507: PH Fleet
RE: Mercedes C63 AMG Edition 507: PH Fleet
Tuesday 29th April 2014

Mercedes C63 AMG Edition 507: PH Fleet

Let's put that fuel consumption issue to bed once and for all



A month and over 2,000 miles in I think I'm qualified to settle a point of conversation that inevitably occurs whenever the C63 is discussed. And settle it, I hope, definitively so we don't have to talk about it again and can concentrate on fun stuff like drifting around Mercedes-Benz World's skid pan.

Hold the phone - turns out it's a bit thirsty
Hold the phone - turns out it's a bit thirsty
Of COURSE it's thirsty. There's a pretty obvious '6.3' badge on the side of it so it's not like they didn't warn you.

What's emerged though is that on a cruise it's consistently thirsty, by which I mean fuel consumption hovers around the low 20s however you drive it. I've driven to Wales and back at a 'steady motorway cruise' with mountain bikes on the roof and got around 21mpg. I do the stop-start 40-mile M25 commute and get 22ish. I've had to crawl along in the slow lane having been caught out by the reserve light coming on seconds after the needle drops below the quarter tank mark and got 24mpg. And on the way to Sunday Service the other day I was at a cruise-controlled 55mph waiting for a mate to catch me up on the M25 for about 10 miles and just scraped 25.

So basically it doesn't make much difference whether you're mincing or mashing the throttle. I'm rather pleased with this discovery. Mainly because it means there's naff all incentive for trying to drive slowly to save fuel. PHer and C63 owner Grant Hibbett would seem to agree, Tweeting "I find there's only 2-3mpg in bumbling along versus, erm, making progress" when I mentioned as much online.

Skidpan gentle on tyres, commute less so
Skidpan gentle on tyres, commute less so
Of course, start properly pressing on and the 507 will slurp down fuel in quarter-tank gulps. But if you're driving it like that you'll have more pressing concerns. Like 'is half a tank enough to do the next 10 miles?' or 'how long before they set up a road block?' Pays your money, etc.

Gripes thus far are few but include seats that don't go low enough, tyre roar that intrudes on otherwise peaceful cruising, the slightly off-set wheel and ... no, that's about it really. Oh, and I did set off one morning only to get a strident warning from the tyre pressure sensor. A lack of change meant I couldn't top it up at any of the air lines I passed, denial and self righteous rage seeing me bumble along the M25 until I found a Sainsbury's with a free to use air line. Mercedes Brentwood replaced the tyre on the press fleet account, the Conti Sport Contact 2 a burly £254 fitted if I'd been paying. So I'm glad I wasn't.

Gatecrashing the AMG lounge at Sunday Service
Gatecrashing the AMG lounge at Sunday Service
Meanwhile there are many things I love about this car but I've got six months to bore you with them so I'll conclude with this. Is there any other stat about your car even the automotively illiterate can appreciate beyond engine capacity? Most non-car folk couldn't honestly tell you whether 400hp is significantly better than 100 but engine size is so deeply engrained in motoring hierarchy you'll ALWAYS be able to get a response with this single Top Trumps stat.

I love it. I parked up next to a builder the other day and he wandered over and said 'What's that got in it, mate?' I told him. 'Get out of it. 6.2 litres? In that? No, you're having me on...' It never fails to tickle me. In a modern context it IS a truly outrageous number that goes beyond the wow factor of the performance or noise it makes. People look genuinely shocked that a grey Mercedes estate can pack so much heat.

You'll have read about the SLS Final Edition we've just driven; that 'my' family estate car with room for bikes, baby clobber and the rest has fundamentally the same engine under the bonnet is just magnificent. It's a properly special car this one, a sense that's only growing with every mile that passes. Along with a sense of inevitability that at some point hence I will put my own money into one.


FACT SHEET
Car:
2013 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG Edition 507
Run by: Dan
On fleet since: March 2014
Mileage: 9,251
List price new: £68,470 before options (£80,075 as tested, comprising Privacy Glass £330, reversing camera £390, Lighting Package £150, three-zone climate control £590, Keyless Go £665, AMG Performance Media £2,040, Comand Online with six-disc changer £250, DAB £335, Harmon Kardon surround sound £650, phone pre-wiring with roof aerial £290, Designo Magno Platinum paint £3,660, rear axle limited-slip differential £1,745 and 19-inch wheels £510)
Last month at a glance: Lots of miles (some of them sideways) and fuel later grin isn't subsiding

Previous reports:
C63 arrives, Dan hasn't let anyone else have a go since


A little corporate propaganda about the engine for your viewing pleasure...

Photos (MB World): Dave Smith

 

   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

 

 

Author
Discussion

BristolLee

Original Poster:

42 posts

157 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
"Is there any other stat about your car even the automotively illiterate can appreciate beyond engine capacity?"

Ok, so it's not quite the same as a 6.2 litre engine in a family wagon, but the main response i get from people about the Celica is:

"8000rpm in a 1.8?"

Still surprises people that one, especially when I have a beaming grin on my face when i tell them! biggrin

Glad to hear you're enjoying the Merc. I've seen a few around lately and the noise alone makes me smile.

wildman0609

885 posts

205 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
have to agree with all of that, motorway mpg always seems to be the same no matter what. You can set cruise control for 65mph for 150 miles to save a bit of fuel then in the twisty roads near home have some fun and use a third of a tank. They are an absolutely ridiculous car, with nothing else out there that even comes close.

I agree the seat could do with going lower, also mine seem to be showing quite a bit of bolster wear only after 3600 miles.

Mr SFJ

4,089 posts

151 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
I see a stunning red saloon C63 most days leaving work and the noise is incredible!

Davey S2

13,394 posts

283 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
Lovely cars but I just couldn't justify the fuel costs for a commute car.

I got rid of my Cayman S as it was costing me over £100 a week in petrol just to sit at 80 on the motorway.

They do make an epic noise though.

Nick Young

254 posts

279 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
Can't imagine that a few MPG either way should be of much significance to anyone that can blow 80 grand on a car that will be worth half of that in 12 months time, get on with the drifting! smile

TWPC

904 posts

190 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
You're absolutely right, 6.2 litres is an extraordinary number and it really bears stopping and thinking about.

Growing up in the 70s and 80s, the attainable bog standard was 1.6l or 2.0l. I got hugely overexcited in 1980 when my Dad bought a Saab 900 turbo... Apart from 'American Cars' which had mythical 7.0l engines, the exotica had 4.4l flat 12s or 5.2l V12s.

We really do live in a golden age: 6.2l in a little estate car. AND its only got 8 cylinders: imagine how vast they are! I used to be bewildered by the idea of the Porsche 944S with its 3.0l 4 cyl engine but the Merc's pots are even bigger.

Thinking about the cars I've owned, the only two that have/had a really impressive number are:
Honda S2000 - 9,000rpm
Volvo XC90 - in financial terms the biggest single export Sweden has ever produced (not at all PH, I know)

KMB

263 posts

252 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
I think the rev limiter let you go to 9300rpm in the S2000 (third flash after 9000rpm)... Unless this was just a myth.

It certainly flashed 3 times before rev cut, not that I used to check this or anything biggrin

GranCab

2,914 posts

175 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
I have emailed the AMG video to Porsche ...

Decibel

95 posts

185 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
I always thought that an RS4 would be my wagon of choice but I really want one of these. Unfortunately being forced to buy a house this year....

MagicMike

234 posts

149 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
I learnt the hard way not to play fuel light bingo with my C63 when I first got it. When people look at the 6.3 AMG badge you seem them pointing, little realising it's only a 6.2!

I justify my fuel cost by only using the car on weekends and the odd evening, as I am part of the rat race every day on the Central line.

Either way it's a small price to pay for such an exhilarating car, though the wife disagrees (but she's an Accountant so she would) biggrin


AudiWurst

4,755 posts

256 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
Why leave that ugly roof rack on, when it's not being used?

moffat

1,020 posts

254 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
I easily get 27mpg from cold to stop going from Nottingham to Heathrow at 70-75mph.

Dull I know, but doing that means I can get there and back on 1 tank biggrin

Edited to add that my average has been 18.3mpg over 13000 miles and normally I don't hold back!

rgw2012

606 posts

172 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
Mercedes Brentwood replaced the tyre on the press fleet account, the Conti Sport Contact 2 a burly £254 fitted if I'd been paying. So I'm glad I wasn't.

Don't ever buy tyres from a Main Dealer - Conti Sport Contact 5's are only £172 fitted per corner from other suppliers (eg F1 Autocentres).

Agree with the MPG findings - simple answer - just enjoy the car and have fun 'cos the end MPG result isn't significant enough to worry about smile

Pittsy98

26 posts

181 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
I love my 507, and I'm glad it's not just me getting low 20 MPG on a 'steady' run. More alarmingly, I have covered just over 7k miles since I picked her up, and have an average MPG over those miles of just 17!!
Worth every penny at the pump though, as each time I turn the key it puts a huge grin on my face and everyone around me - except from my wife when I wake our sleeping baby!!
I do wish the tank was slightly larger, as I really feel the need to keep an eagle eye on the fuel gauge. It's no exaggeration to say that after a serious 'blast' to the next town and back can easily see the needle plunge by a qtr. It's safe to say I'm a regular at the local petrol station!

paulmon

2,209 posts

270 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
AudiWurst said:
Why leave that ugly roof rack on, when it's not being used?
Swap the thule jobbies for Whispbars. I have them on my E Class wagon and they look miles better and I have no problems fitting the Thule 591's to it. Would love one of these or an E63 when my current lease expires.

P

f328nvl

507 posts

247 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
MagicMike said:
I learnt the hard way not to play fuel light bingo with my C63 when I first got it. When people look at the 6.3 AMG badge you seem them pointing, little realising it's only a 6.2!

I justify my fuel cost by only using the car on weekends and the odd evening, as I am part of the rat race every day on the Central line.

Either way it's a small price to pay for such an exhilarating car, though the wife disagrees (but she's an Accountant so she would) biggrin
I am an accountant and mine only has 487BHP. Wait until it starts to rattle.

http://www.honestjg.com/2013/12/c63-amg-ppp-first-...

http://www.honestjg.com/2013/01/c63-amg-second-imp...

Edited by f328nvl on Tuesday 29th April 14:39

SturdyHSV

10,443 posts

196 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
Pittsy98 said:

So much evil.

cloud9

loudlashadjuster

6,420 posts

213 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
AudiWurst said:
Why leave that ugly roof rack on, when it's not being used?
I think it still looks great. Most estates look just as good if not better with (decent) bars & carriers on. Squatter, seems to enhance the stance somehow, as well as pointing out what a go-anywhere sporty ironman the driver is wink

No? Just me then!

Besides, if the bikes are on and off frequently it's either a two-person job to lift the assembled bars/carriers off assembled (assuming you have somewhere big enough to store them all made up), or you have to dismantle the whole lot then measure and refit the next time you're using them - PITA.

If it's going to be less than a week until I'm using mine again I'll probably just leave them on.

Anyway, C63s of wherever variety are simply epic. The 2024 PH hero article is probably already written.

Stu R

21,638 posts

244 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
If you want to feel better about the consumption, try the ML63 AMG. Low 20's is the stuff of dreams.

loudlashadjuster

6,420 posts

213 months

Tuesday 29th April 2014
quotequote all
On the fuel issue, it's not as bad a it sounds.

Compared to a hum-drum C220 CDI estate (currently averaging about 38MPG over 24,000 miles according to OBC), the extra cost in fuel to run a C63 507 at ~12k miles p.a. is only about £125 a month.

Tyres on the AMG-trimmed cooking models are almost as expensive too, so not much saving there.

Small price to pay to avoid a grotty 4-cyl diesel I would say!