Getting a house back from an ex?
Getting a house back from an ex?
Author
Discussion

BigsimonY

Original Poster:

634 posts

156 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
Ok so im asking this on behalf of my work pal. I don't think i will have all the info, but i will tell what i know. So Jeff and his new girlfriend{never married} are together 4 months and she falls pregnant. Soon after his great uncle dies leaving him a house. They move into it. 12 months later the relationship ends. Jeff says she can live in house as she has his child. he gets a flat and they live there life's. Fast forward 18 years, the son is now in the army and overseas. Jeff drops the bomb shell to ex he now wants to sell the house. She responds its her home and he is not selling it. Now Jeff tells me the all the paper work is in his name as is the ownership to the house, i presume he is talking about the deeds. But she is adamant he cant sell it and he gifted her the house all those years ago. Now he flatly denies there was ever a conversion where he even made out she was ever going to become the owner of the house. He says it was always made clear she would have that home while she was looking after his child. Now the child is 18 and in the army and overseas he want the money that's in the house for him. He offered to sell it to her and a 20k discount of the market value but that was rejected. Now if the deeds are in his name and lots of paperwork to show its always has been his house. Can she claim ownership of it and stop him from selling it?

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

188 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
She is very unlikely to be able to claim ownership but she can claim an 'interest' in it, so she may be able to obstruct the sale or if not be entitled to a share of the sale proceeds.

I assume no rent was ever paid and she maintained it.

NoOffenceTaken

8 posts

153 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
BigsimonY said:
Ok so im asking this on behalf of my work pal. I don't think i will have all the info, but i will tell what i know. So Jeff and his new girlfriend{never married} are together 4 months and she falls pregnant. Soon after his great uncle dies leaving him a house. They move into it. 12 months later the relationship ends. Jeff says she can live in house as she has his child. he gets a flat and they live there life's. Fast forward 18 years, the son is now in the army and overseas. Jeff drops the bomb shell to ex he now wants to sell the house. She responds its her home and he is not selling it. Now Jeff tells me the all the paper work is in his name as is the ownership to the house, i presume he is talking about the deeds. But she is adamant he cant sell it and he gifted her the house all those years ago. Now he flatly denies there was ever a conversion where he even made out she was ever going to become the owner of the house. He says it was always made clear she would have that home while she was looking after his child. Now the child is 18 and in the army and overseas he want the money that's in the house for him. He offered to sell it to her and a 20k discount of the market value but that was rejected. Now if the deeds are in his name and lots of paperwork to show its always has been his house. Can she claim ownership of it and stop him from selling it?
Two words (three if its not shortened).......You're F*cked

BigsimonY

Original Poster:

634 posts

156 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
no no rent was paid. The council tax was paid, she paid it but the bill was in his name.

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

188 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
He needs to seek legal advice.

If he paid no child maintenance he could argue rent was waived in lieu, but if she is adamant a Judge will have to decide.

Fozziebear

1,840 posts

171 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
Solicitor, a good one, then wait. I have a feeling she can get half the proceeds of the sale.

BigsimonY

Original Poster:

634 posts

156 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
The law needs to have long hard look at its self. This seems very unfair...

Edited by BigsimonY on Saturday 3rd May 14:19

Siscar

6,315 posts

160 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
Well it proves the need to document what you do when you do it.

Red Devil

13,534 posts

239 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
BigsimonY said:
The law needs to have long hard clock at its self. This seems very unfair...
That all depends on what time it is. wink

Siscar said:
Well it proves the need to document what you do when you do it.
Oh yes. Amazing how many people fail to do so in such matters as this and live to regret it.


Edited by Red Devil on Saturday 3rd May 12:22

BE57 TOY

2,628 posts

178 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
As she has paid upkeep I'm fairly sure it's half hers now, unfortunately. Bloody women.

aw51 121565

4,773 posts

264 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
On the bright side, half of the house is worth a damn sight more than the whole house was worth two decades ago (glass half full and all that wink ).

Sorry for the OP, and yes the law can be very unfair/harsh at times smile . Doing stuff on an 'unwritten basis' can lead to problems, I ended up homeless once due to a similar issue.

Having said this, whose name(s) is(are) on the property (if this sentence is in the proper terms?) at the Land Registry as the tenant(s)?

Jasandjules

72,683 posts

260 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
You need to sit down with a lawyer and go through this in great detail.

I expect she will have an equitable and beneficial interest in the property - the amount of it however could vary greatly depending on the details. Thus you need advice from someone who is up to date on their property law.

jas xjr

11,309 posts

270 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
aw51 121565 said:
On the bright side, half of the house is worth a damn sight more than the whole house was worth two decades ago (glass half full and all that wink ).

Sorry for the OP, and yes the law can be very unfair/harsh at times smile . Doing stuff on an 'unwritten basis' can lead to problems, I ended up homeless once due to a similar issue.

Having said this, whose name(s) is(are) on the property (if this sentence is in the proper terms?) at the Land Registry as the tenant(s)?
as far as i know , the land registry would not record the tenants details

supersport

4,646 posts

258 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
The house is in his name and they were never married, so she has no entitlement. She was entitled to money for the child but you could argue that she got that in free tent

When there is no marriage the other partner is entitled to jack. Still needs an actual lawyer to get it sorted though.

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

188 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
supersport said:
The house is in his name and they were never married, so she has no entitlement. She was entitled to money for the child but you could argue that she got that in free tent

When there is no marriage the other partner is entitled to jack. Still needs an actual lawyer to get it sorted though.
You are wrong.

Land and property trust law is complicated.

They shared the house as a family home.
They had a child while residing together in the home.
The owner moved out leaving the mother and child in occupation.
The mother has paid for 100% of the maintenance of the house for 18 years.
There is no formal rental agreement with or rent paid to the owner.

I can assure you that she is entitled to something if she decides to fight for it.

robinessex

12,044 posts

212 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
If you agree half each, you'll end up with er, half each. If it gets all legal, he'll most likley end up with 50%. Minus a bloody great legal bill. Go figure.

98elise

32,851 posts

192 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
supersport said:
The house is in his name and they were never married, so she has no entitlement. She was entitled to money for the child but you could argue that she got that in free tent

When there is no marriage the other partner is entitled to jack. Still needs an actual lawyer to get it sorted though.
You are wrong.

Land and property trust law is complicated.

They shared the house as a family home.
They had a child while residing together in the home.
The owner moved out leaving the mother and child in occupation.
The mother has paid for 100% of the maintenance of the house for 18 years.
There is no formal rental agreement with or rent paid to the owner.

I can assure you that she is entitled to something if she decides to fight for it.
Agreed. In principal she owns nothing as they are unmarried, but the fact she has maintained it for 2 decades means she has some ownership. In effect she has been contributing to the cost of the house.

Rollcage

11,345 posts

223 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
98elise said:
Agreed. In principal she owns nothing as they are unmarried, but the fact she has maintained it for 2 decades means she has some ownership. In effect she has been contributing to the cost of the house.
It's not mentioned anywhere that she has been contributing to the maintenance?

Siscar

6,315 posts

160 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
Rollcage said:
98elise said:
Agreed. In principal she owns nothing as they are unmarried, but the fact she has maintained it for 2 decades means she has some ownership. In effect she has been contributing to the cost of the house.
It's not mentioned anywhere that she has been contributing to the maintenance?
The implication is that she's been paying all of it, there implication is that he hasn't been paying anything other than the initial provision of the house.

Rollcage

11,345 posts

223 months

Saturday 3rd May 2014
quotequote all
There's no implication at all - only assumptions at the moment!

If she has been contributing, then she'll certainly be entitled to something.