Why did my Clio 172 tyre pull off the rim?
Why did my Clio 172 tyre pull off the rim?
Author
Discussion

zed4

Original Poster:

7,248 posts

251 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
Hi,

Last night I had a small incident in the Clio 172 Cup. I spun it on a country lane and managed to scrape the bumper and smash a headlight. Luckily all cheap to replace, no one hurt and no major damage done. The big PITA was the tyre pulled off the rim and the spare had a puncture!!

Now, I have just bought the car last week and I’ve not got round to checking the tyre pressures yet (or the spare in the boot - stupid I know), so I don’t know if the pressures were low or not. But one thing I did notice is that the tyres look a bit stretched. Are 195 width tyres the correct size for the Clio 172? They look a bit too narrow and stretched to me.

I’m wondering if the reason the car suddenly let go and spun was due to the tyre coming off the rim mid corner, or whether the tyre coming off was due to the spin, after traction was lost. I have plenty of experience driving my TVR and the VX220 Turbo, and whilst I’m not a professional driver, I was surprised with the ease the Clio suddenly let go and spin so quickly mid corner without warning.

Any thoughts?

Cheers,

Dan

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

218 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
I would have thought if the tyre pressure was very low then it would be fairly simple for the tyre to break contact with the wheel - especially if you were "pressing on". I suppose rapid deflation of the tyre could then lead to you losing control and ultimately the car spinning - especially if you've steered the "wrong" way or braked. I've heard it's rear tyres blowing out that cause more cars to spin but I don't know if that's true.

HonestIago

1,719 posts

215 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
The standard tyre size on the 182 is 205/45/R16. Unless your 172 is running 15s then maybe the tyre size is wrong?

zed4

Original Poster:

7,248 posts

251 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
Sorry, have Googled now and have found that the standard tyre size is 195 wide, so it seems they were the correct size. They still don’t look wide enough to me though.

BritishRacinGrin

26,493 posts

189 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
The tyre pressure would've had to have been very low i.e. well below 10psi low. More likely the tyre caught on something when you were spinning.

AlexIT

1,687 posts

167 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
Yes 195 is the correct tyre width.

It is difficult to say if the deflated tyre was cause or consequence of the accident.
Speaking from experience (ouch!) when I touched -in what to me seemed very lightly- a small kerb, the tyre went immediately off the rim.

It might also be that your tyre was also low on pressure, making such things easier to happen, but I wouldn't see it as the root cause.


zed4

Original Poster:

7,248 posts

251 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
I admit, I probably just ran out of talent and it’s a car I’m not too familiar with. The Clio does seem very light on the back end. I just have this wonder whether the tyre coming off the rim is the cause or the by product of the spin! I was travelling quickly, but within the speed limit. It was a very long corner, so I guess the back end (on cold tyres) just gave up gripping.

Edit: There were skid marks on the road, but it was dark so I couldn't see them very well. I wonder if they could shine some light on what exactly happened.

Atterz

67 posts

173 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
As said above with regards to low tyre pressures, a spin can quite easily cause the forces needed to remove the bead from the rim at speed.

Another lesson to learn with a front driver, short wheelbased hatch is to not lift mid corner, this, as you said makes the back rather light and has resulted in a fair old share of FWD Hot Hatches going to car Heaven backwards through a hedge.

zed4

Original Poster:

7,248 posts

251 months

Tuesday 13th May 2014
quotequote all
Atterz said:
As said above with regards to low tyre pressures, a spin can quite easily cause the forces needed to remove the bead from the rim at speed.

Another lesson to learn with a front driver, short wheelbased hatch is to not lift mid corner, this, as you said makes the back rather light and has resulted in a fair old share of FWD Hot Hatches going to car Heaven backwards through a hedge.
hehe

Luckily it wasn't the tidiest 172 about, it's just a little less tidy now! I've found the parts for very little money on eBay, so should have it mostly sorted for less than £200.

zed4

Original Poster:

7,248 posts

251 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Update, I've found a screw in the offending tyre today. I reckon that's a good contributing factor! It was probably low on pressure.

HonestIago

1,719 posts

215 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
zed4 said:
Sorry, have Googled now and have found that the standard tyre size is 195 wide, so it seems they were the correct size. They still don’t look wide enough to me though.
Apologies...I assumed the 172/182 have the same size wheels as my Trophy, which takes 205/45/R16 rubber.

matt1269

598 posts

203 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
The 172's have 195 tyres and the 182's have 205.

Stedman

7,459 posts

221 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
172 cups are very light on the rear end. IIRC they have something silly like 5% rear braking bias?

lockup

383 posts

271 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Atterz said:
Another lesson to learn with a front driver, short wheelbased hatch is how much to lift mid corner
EFA

The Vambo

7,714 posts

170 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
zed4 said:
The Clio does seem very light on the back end.
Rear dampers are knackered, unless you changed them this morning and if you did, they will be knackered again tomorrow.